- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:11 pm to DelU249
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:11 pm to DelU249
IMO opinion it was absolutely a catch, easily. After the catch where he still had complete control. He fell to ground reaching out for the end zone. If anything you call that a fumble, but I just don't see how that is not ruled a catch
1
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:12 pm to DelU249
Yes, it was a catch.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:12 pm to LordoftheManor
It's a catch in every sense of the word.
The rule is dumb and takes away common sense
The rule is dumb and takes away common sense
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:12 pm to Masterag
quote:
If the ground can't cause a fumble then it shouldn't be able to cause an incompletion either. This is fricking stupid.
Pretty much.
Same thing with a player maintaining possession after a TD catch, but a runner being allowed to fumble a split second after the ball crossed the goalline. Makes no sense.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:12 pm to DallasTiger
Wtf are these people that are saying yes seeing?
Clearly no.
Clearly no.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:13 pm to shel311
Lance Moore
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:13 pm to TexasTiger08
quote:
Was it a catch by the NFL rule? No.
Was it a catch by anybody's standards that has common sense? Yeah.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:13 pm to DelU249
quote:
ETA: as I've seen it called for years and as I understand the rules
It wasn't
Good call by refs
I think it was a catch. It wasn't a case of going to the ground while in the process of making the catch. It was a case of catching the ball and making an additional football move to attempt to stretch the ball past the goal line.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:14 pm to DelU249
yes.....
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:14 pm to DelU249
Nope
Good call.
Can't wait to see the Lombardi pass through Texas so that cowgirl fans can go look at it in their local Walmart and know their shame.
Good call.
Can't wait to see the Lombardi pass through Texas so that cowgirl fans can go look at it in their local Walmart and know their shame.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:14 pm to DelU249
I think it was a catch. I think you can't overturn it. But, frick Dallas.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:15 pm to DelU249
No catch.Bryant didn't get control til after the ball bounced off the ground.jmho
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:15 pm to DelU249
yes
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:15 pm to DelU249
Yes
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:15 pm to DelU249
yes
absolutely
absolutely
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:16 pm to QJenk
I know the rule and hate the rule.
this play didn't apply to that rule imo. The act of diving and extending the ball as he landed, other arm and leg down mind you, is the second act of the catch. Total miss by the entire crew.
the ball was also tipped by the defender as dez went up, therefore his second grab of the pass could also be seen as a second "move". Not to mention the at least two if not three steps.
again total blown call. Doesn't mean Dallas would have won in the end though
this play didn't apply to that rule imo. The act of diving and extending the ball as he landed, other arm and leg down mind you, is the second act of the catch. Total miss by the entire crew.
the ball was also tipped by the defender as dez went up, therefore his second grab of the pass could also be seen as a second "move". Not to mention the at least two if not three steps.
again total blown call. Doesn't mean Dallas would have won in the end though
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:16 pm to tidalmouse
I don't know, but the rule is fricking idiotic. Ruined a great game. By any reasonable standard it was a catch, and a great one.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:17 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:Catch, 3 steps, dive.
Wtf are these people that are saying yes seeing?
At what point is it a catch, 4 steps? 6 steps?
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:17 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:Obviously not a rule book.
Wtf are these people that are saying yes seeing?
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:17 pm to DelU249
Yes.
Page 6 of 47
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News