Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 1/11/15 at 11:47 pm to
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53893 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 11:47 pm to
I carefully considered the explanation provided by the high-ranking official, I think he's a VP, and I conclude that it was incomplete.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9784 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 12:28 am to
After changing direction by jumping up and inside of Shields to get ball and after getting 2nd foot to touch ground he had changed direction trying to go back outside of Shields while also turning body from facing opposite sideline to angled more towards pylon on side he was on. Also while 2nd foot is beginning to push it gets cut and tangled up by Shields trailing leg left up in air and Dez does not get much of a push and starts going down angled facing pylon with right shoulder much closer to goal line than left, but he then still gets a push from left foot which was 3rd foot down after catch to push closer to goal line and past Shields. With this push and right hand landing he also starts to rotate left shoulder forward while holding left hand with ball out in front of shoulder both of which were pushing ball more towards goal line than angle they were in before left foot landed to give final push. During this his right forearm went down. After right forearm hits ground his left hand and shoulder continue rotating even more square to goal line and closer to goal line when left hand hits ground and slides and ball pushes up.

How can momentum of catch where he went from being outside and even with Shields (maybe a little ahead) to getting below and inside him with jump for catch (Shields did jump towards inside after Dez but landed with just a leg more inside than Dez) take Dez back angling to pylon and to the outside of Shields and then past Shields?
This post was edited on 1/12/15 at 12:33 am
Posted by lsutiger2011
Georgia
Member since Jan 2009
1510 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 12:33 am to
No
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 2:39 am to
I watched the catch before even seeing the main argument is whether or not he extended and my first instinct was he didn't. His elbow is bent and barely outstretched.

If he fully extended or at least had a.more obtuse angle, I could see it, but his angle is too acute to give him the benefit of that doubt.

That said, I thought evidence had to be clear and indisputable to overturn..... not sure it was. No one can look into his mind and see for sure what he was intending.
This post was edited on 1/12/15 at 2:40 am
Posted by pivey14
In Your Head
Member since Mar 2012
15446 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 2:43 am to
By rule, no.

It's a shitty rule and should've been a catch.
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18390 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 3:20 am to
quote:



No, he definitely lunges for the endzone bud. Otherwise he would tuck it away into his body, but it's pretty clear he's reaching for the goal line if you've ever watched football in your life.

The question, is a lunge considered a football move?


Reaching for a first down or diving are bothe considered football moves unless you are Dez. Some radio guy said only Dez can catch the ball on the 5 yard line and get to the 6 inch line whilst spinning 110 degrees and going from vertical to completely horizontal without making a football move.
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18390 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 3:28 am to
quote:

I don't think a football move was ever made. He didn't gain full possession until right before he went down. A lunge like that isn't a football move. A football move has to involve your feet.

Bryant should have worried more about securing the ball than reaching it towards the endzone.


You obviously do not know the rule, it clearly states reaching for a first down marker and diving to get out of bounds as examples. In this scenario, there is a possibility that two of the criteria were met on that play.
Posted by Dalosaqy
I can't quite re
Member since Dec 2007
13292 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 4:05 am to
Officials were unanimous: no.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 5:37 am to


quote:

Moores stretch made it a catch.


No, regaining control of the ball on the ground made it a catch.

quote:

If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact with an opponent), he must maintain control of the ball after he touches the ground, whether in the field of play or the end zone.


Lance Moore lost control of the ball when he went to the ground as you can see by the movement. If the ball was knocked away at that point or hit the ground, it would have been incomplete, but:

quote:

If he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control, the pass is incomplete. If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground, the pass is complete.


He regained control of the ball after going to the ground, making it a catch. Both hands on the ball, no movement, after contact with the ground. These really aren't similar plays.



As soon as he regains control, the play is over given that he is the enddzone.

As much as Roger wants the plays to be similar, they aren't.

quote:

But Lance clearly didn't possess the ball through the ground



Which is exactly what I said in the previous post. He lost control and regained it while on the ground, making it a TD according to that stupid rule.
This post was edited on 1/12/15 at 5:45 am
Posted by BillyBobfan24_7
R.I.P. SGT Nelson
Member since May 2004
18390 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:21 am to
quote:

Bwahaha...u mad


You are a Saints fan trolling a Cowboys loss because that's all you have had to root for for the last several weeks. You are the very definition of "u mad."
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85492 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:28 am to
it wasn't a catch

I thought it was kinda obvious
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126653 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:36 am to
No
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
154722 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:41 am to
quote:

Dez can catch the ball on the 5 yard line and get to the 6 inch line whilst spinning 110 degrees and going from vertical to completely horizontal without making a football move
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216257 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:44 am to
quote:

I thought it was kinda obvious


It was obvious...It was a catch.......
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
103619 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:52 am to
quote:

it wasn't a catch

I thought it was kinda obvious



This. Although my Cowboys fan friend I was watching with didn't agree.
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:52 am to
Yall are still arguing about this obvious incomplete pass??
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17360 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:54 am to
We will probably go another ten pages as it has now been interjected that Bryant may have been stretching for the sideline.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112666 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:54 am to
quote:

I truly have no idea how one could arrive at that conclusion. It requires you to believe it was easier for Bryant to do what he did than to simply tuck the ball away
If it's the same play but Dez catches the ball around, say, the 30 yard line, I'm not saying it would be unprecedented, but that fall he made would be pretty unnatural IMO. You typically see some variatoin of the tuck with 2 hands or maybe 1 hand but the player will try to fall a little on his side to ease the fall a bit. Dez didn't do that.

That's why I don't see how anyone can definitively say it was not a stretch for the goalline.
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:58 am to
If he had held the ball out like Lance Moore did in the super bowl then I would agree it is a football move, to me it looked like he was just going to the ground with the ball
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112666 posts
Posted on 1/12/15 at 7:58 am to
quote:

We will probably go another ten pages as it has now been interjected that Bryant may have been stretching for the sideline
You mean the goalline?

Also that was mentioned long ago, it's not new to this thread.
Jump to page
Page First 29 30 31 32 33 ... 47
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 31 of 47Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram