Started By
Message

re: The New-Look CFP Has New Dates: 2024 Playoff to Start in December Against NFL Games-update

Posted on 4/29/23 at 12:20 pm to
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
84382 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

In practice, any regular season top 5 matchup like Alabama-LSU, UGA-AU, Ohio State-Michigan won’t eliminate either team anymore.

That means those games on campus won’t be as important as the 3 rounds of neutral site playoff games.

The only punishment for Alabama losing to UT and LSU is they have to play a first round home game against Tulane? That dramatically reduces the significance of Alabama@UT and Alabama@LSU.

Whether you like this new format or not, way more regular games are going to matter as a result of it. That's not debatable.
Posted by TomRollTideRitter
Member since Aug 2016
12986 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

Whether you like this new format or not, way more regular games are going to matter as a result of it. That's not debatable.


it’s absolutely debatable. Going from 2 to 4 reduced the number of important regular season games because everyone decided the playoff was all that mattered after it was invented.

Just making a 12-team playoff may not matter any more than making a major bowl does currently.

If a late season game between #10 and #14 just decides who gets their arse kicked in the first round, that game won’t matter any more than it does now.

If the format gives us more TCU-Michigan playoff games, then it will be a positive. If it gives us more Alabama-Kansas State like playoff games, then it will be a negative.

I’m not opposed to a change in # of teams, but I am opposed to ending the season with 4 straight neutral site games if you win your conference and the NC. That’s ridiculous.
This post was edited on 4/29/23 at 8:51 pm
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23282 posts
Posted on 4/29/23 at 9:51 pm to
It should create more parity as other teams can now get to the elimination round without a perfect record.

I do think you just gave several teams basically an auto-bid like OSU, ND, and Bama.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
55787 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 11:33 am to




quote:

Notable: Those three CFP first-round Saturday games will go up against the NFL. Semifinals are on Thursday/Friday to avoid the NFL’s wild card weekend.

@ChrisVannini and I explain why the CFP made these choices:

quote:

Also, we’ve written about this for two years straight (lol) but, yes, the Rose Bowl will have its regular time slot on New Year’s Day as a quarterfinal.

Much of this was announced last week, but the actual bowl assignments and dates for semifinals are newly confirmed.

LINK
This post was edited on 5/2/23 at 11:42 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
103947 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 1:16 pm to
A quarterfinal game on a weds at a neutral site will have absolutely piss poor attendance. It will be laughably bad
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
16464 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 1:21 pm to
That is a lot of football. Given the conference championship will look more like an elimination game with no divisions, that's 5 rounds of football.
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
24135 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Hell, if you are Ohio State or Michigan I would think you would LOVE the chance to force a team from the south to have to play in freezing temps (with the possibility of snow). As it stands now with the season ending in late November it really hasn't gotten terribly cold in places like Baton Rouge, Tuscaloosa, Clemson, Athens, etc. So having to play a game in 20 degree temps with snow would be a WHOLE different ball game!



OSU's AD has already said they would likely not play a "home" game in Columbus if possible. I think he mentioned Indy as a possible site for an OSU home game if they had one.

OSU is a southern speed/power team who just happens to reside in the midwest. I would hate not having a game in the Shoe for the playoffs, but also understand OSU would rather have a track meet over almost any other team in the country with their skill positions
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
62056 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 1:35 pm to
I just think the timing is weird as students will likely have just gone home for the holidays when those games are played.
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
16464 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

OSU's AD has already said they would likely not play a "home" game in Columbus if possible. I think he mentioned Indy as a possible site for an OSU home game if they had one.

OSU is a southern speed/power team who just happens to reside in the midwest. I would hate not having a game in the Shoe for the playoffs, but also understand OSU would rather have a track meet over almost any other team in the country with their skill positions




Even the Buckeyes don't want to play in the snow. I like to call it the Michigan effect.
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
24135 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 1:41 pm to
Oh the timing and all of it is dumb but you want to have more playoff games you have to figure it out.

My solution was always 4 16 team conferences with 4 team semis/finals in each conference then the winner of each conference plays in a 4 team playoff. It's really a 16 team playoff and you stay regional for the first couple of games.
Posted by T
Member since Jan 2004
9889 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 1:51 pm to
Fans aren’t going to travel across the country 3 weeks in a row. Get rid of the faux bowl games and make it like the NFL playoffs. No Saturday games is just stupid.
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
27663 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

Fans aren’t going to travel across the country 3 weeks in a row.


Agreed.

quote:

Get rid of the faux bowl games and make it like the NFL playoffs.


Disagree.

quote:

No Saturday games is just stupid.



Agree x 1,000,000,000
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59922 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 2:01 pm to
If they keep the Conference Championship Games (which they will) this whole setup is stupid and unfair. Using last year UGA and Michigan get a “bye” because they won the CCG that tOSU and Bama did not have to play. So they still play the same amount of games as the teams that advance to the round of 8
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96490 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Using last year UGA and Michigan get a “bye” because they won the CCG that tOSU and Bama did not have to play. So they still play the same amount of games as the teams that advance to the round of 8


say what?
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
17934 posts
Posted on 5/2/23 at 10:10 pm to
When does the NFL start playing Saturday games? If the NCAA started the regular season a week earlier, wouldn't that make it easier to play on Saturdays without going up against the NFL?
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
57353 posts
Posted on 5/3/23 at 8:37 am to
quote:

If they keep the Conference Championship Games (which they will)


I really wish they wouldn’t.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram