- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The last time a dominant team lost in a Super Regional and failed to make the CWS
Posted on 6/12/22 at 6:46 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 6:46 pm
56-7 headed into the SR.
Last time a team like that lost?
Last time a team like that lost?
Posted on 6/12/22 at 6:48 pm to Jugular Joe
quote:
56-7 headed into the SR.
TAMU 1989 was better.
That has happened a bunch. Who says they were “dominant”. Again, they didn’t play any tough series on the road and avoided Arky, TAMU and LSU - NINE frickING GAMES OF 30 had they played them. They would have taken more losses.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 6:48 pm to Jugular Joe
Arkansas last year. They lost to NC State who then had Vandy pull some shenanigans to knock NC St from CWS
This post was edited on 6/12/22 at 6:50 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 6:49 pm to Jugular Joe
Vandy when they went 26-3 in the sec
Posted on 6/12/22 at 6:55 pm to josh336
South Carolina went 25-5 in 2000 and lost to ULL and their frosted tips
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:01 pm to The Boat
Indeed. 56-10 overall.
At least ULL did us a solid and went on to knock Clemson out of the CWS.

At least ULL did us a solid and went on to knock Clemson out of the CWS.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:17 pm to Tiger1988
quote:
TAMU 1989 was better.
Remember when Skip moved Big Ben from the mound to left field in case A&M started to rally. Those old 6 team regionals were the best.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:21 pm to lsutigerdan
Question about the 6 team regionals… what was the most possible games you could play in one?
Would they be feasible nowadays?
Would they be feasible nowadays?
This post was edited on 6/12/22 at 7:23 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:25 pm to lsutigerdan
FSU has had a few
1990 57-15
2002 60-14
2003 54-13-1
1990 57-15
2002 60-14
2003 54-13-1
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:27 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
Would they be feasible nowadays?
The math doesn't work Was eight 6 team regionals, now there's 64 teams.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:33 pm to chalmetteowl
They played 3 games every day the first 3 days in the old 6-team regionals. I don’t remember, but somewhere along the way, they probably played 4 in one day if a game or two or more got rained out or delayed.
If the field ever expanded to 96, you’d get 6-team regionals back. No thanks.
If the field ever expanded to 96, you’d get 6-team regionals back. No thanks.
This post was edited on 6/12/22 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:34 pm to saintsfan22
They would be feasible. Just the if games would get weird
You have if 5 teams or if 3 teams remain games
Plus you get loser of 1-6 playing winner of 3/4
You have if 5 teams or if 3 teams remain games
Plus you get loser of 1-6 playing winner of 3/4
This post was edited on 6/12/22 at 7:36 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:37 pm to josh336
quote:
Vandy when they went 26-3 in the sec
Florida 2014 is possibly worse. While they didn't break records, they won the SEC at 21-9, was the #2 National Seed, and went 0-2 in the Regional.
That year was weird, though. Only 2 of the 8 national seeds made it to the CWS.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:38 pm to sms151t
The if necessary game was usually the first game of Sunday unless the 3-4 loser beat the 1-6 winner on day 2. If the loser champ won that game, the if necessary game followed immediately after that. That’s how LSU beat A&M twice in College Station in ‘89.
Remember, in the old 6-team format, the regional started on a Thursday. They played 9 games in 3 days (3 every day) to get to Sunday
ETA: sms had it correct below. Edited my post to include that.
Remember, in the old 6-team format, the regional started on a Thursday. They played 9 games in 3 days (3 every day) to get to Sunday
ETA: sms had it correct below. Edited my post to include that.
This post was edited on 6/12/22 at 7:43 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 7:41 pm to Domeskeller
Yes the loser of 1-6 played winner of 3/4 game 1 on day 2 which then made the 3rd game possible. But there were times you ever knew the schedule. I liked that format. We played MVC in regional formats as well. We were used to it. I think they went back to it in a form after 5/8 6/7 playin games now
This post was edited on 6/12/22 at 7:43 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 8:03 pm to Jugular Joe
quote:
The last time a dominant team lost in a Super
The falcons lost after having a 28-3 lead in the SUPER bowl
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:20 pm to Tiger1988
quote:
TAMU 1989 was better. That has happened a bunch. Who says they were “dominant”. Again, they didn’t play any tough series on the road and avoided Arky, TAMU and LSU - NINE frickING GAMES OF 30 had they played them. They would have taken more losses.
I have no problem with people piling on Tennessee because of how everything unfolded but to act like we weren’t that good is just ridiculous. I know you think we would have gone 0-9 against LSU, A&M, and Arkansas but it’s just not true. We beat LSU in Hoover and were waiting for A&M and Arky in Hoover but they didn’t last. We won the SEC by 6 games. That’s not a fluke.
Sucks we didn’t finish it off in the NCAA tournament but up until this weekend it’s one of the better seasons in recent memory. Someone can argue there’s better but we were in the discussion. We led the nation in ERA by a large margin and pitched great this weekend outside of 5 innings out of 27. It is what it is but don’t act like we were slaw.
This post was edited on 6/12/22 at 10:21 pm
Posted on 6/12/22 at 10:35 pm to OvertheDwayneBowe
quote:
That year was weird, though. Only 2 of the 8 national seeds made it to the CWS.
Looking like only 2 will this year, Stanford and Texas A&M. Four 2+seed regional teams are already in the CWS.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 11:51 pm to Tiger1988
Man we got some stupid phucking LSU fans.
Jesus.
They weren't dominant?
How is 56-7 not dominant?
Jesus.
They weren't dominant?
How is 56-7 not dominant?
Popular
Back to top

6








