- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tech/ULM football series
Posted on 9/8/09 at 12:09 pm to T1
Posted on 9/8/09 at 12:09 pm to T1
quote:I can't believe that Tech fans actually think they have a program that is too good to do a straight home/home with ULM. To think that is fricking stupid.
I can't believe this thread is still going.
Signed,
Utah (Utah State)
Texas El-Paso (New Mexico State)
Memphis (Arkansas State)
Cincinnati (Miami-OH)
South Florida (Central Florida)
Rutgers (Navy)
West Virginia (East Carolina)
ps - If avoiding your two most traditional rivals is part of what puts you "in the right direction," your program is a steamy worthless pile of dog shite.
This post was edited on 9/8/09 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 9/8/09 at 2:20 pm to truthbetold
He is bitter. ULM just cannot get it together for any year they were in D1-A.
That much losing does that to a person.
That much losing does that to a person.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:41 pm to truthbetold
quote:Of course I'm bitter. ULM/Tech is the best non-LSU game in Louisiana to me, and Tech pussed out of the series when I was 10, so I never got to really enjoy it.
You seem bitter.
So they pussed out of the series to "go in the right direction." What has it gotten them? A trip to Boise and a trip to Shreveport.
Way to fricking go, pussies.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:46 pm to xiv
Just get a PS3 or XBox... Then you can play the game every night!
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:47 pm to xiv
quote:
Tech pussed out of the series when I was 10, so I never got to really enjoy it.
They played our senior year at Tech.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 6:49 pm to JJ27
quote:I was there. And I was already pissed that it was only a four-year contract. Of all the games I've ever been at Aillet, that's the only one that had any energy at all. I guess Tech is frightened of actually being entertaining.
They played our senior year at Tech.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 8:41 pm to xiv
xiv, do you remember when the NLU teams of Pat Collins beat Tech six out of eight in the '80s..........including two shutouts in Ruston?
Pat, of course, was a longtime Tech assistant who switched over to the dark side.
Pat, of course, was a longtime Tech assistant who switched over to the dark side.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 9:04 pm to xiv
quote:
I was there. And I was already pissed that it was only a four-year contract. Of all the games I've ever been at Aillet, that's the only one that had any energy at all. I guess Tech is frightened of actually being entertaining.
Is this the 1997 game you're talking about? I was there too. That was a great game. Too bad the three games that followed weren't as competitive. Those last three games is where this "superiority complex" is coming from.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 9:44 pm to Lakebound
quote:Shhhhhh! Don't let CUSA find this out!!!
xiv, do you remember when the NLU teams of Pat Collins beat Tech six out of eight in the '80s..........including two shutouts in Ruston?
Posted on 9/8/09 at 9:56 pm to LSULM FAN
quote:Why didn't NLU cancel the series in 1988 and replace Tech with Marshall?
Is this the 1997 game you're talking about? I was there too. That was a great game. Too bad the three games that followed weren't as competitive. Those last three games is where this "superiority complex" is coming from.
(Because we're not elitist snobby pussy-arse bastards.)
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:15 pm to xiv
quote:
xiv
Your post earlier about Utah/Utah St. says it all. Why do they continue to play every year when Utah is by far the better program and has dominated the series much more than Tech has dominated ULM? Yet they continue to play. There must be some interest in the yearly matchup. What a concept!!!
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:16 pm to LSULM FAN
In a lot of these cases, its the state legislatures that mandate that the teams play. This is the case in West Virginia (WVU/Marshall) and Utah (BYU/Utah/USU round robin). Could also be the case in Colorado, but I'm not sure.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:17 pm to LSULM FAN
quote:
Utah/Utah St. says it all. Why do they continue to play every year when Utah is by far the better program
Because they both hate the Mormans and need a common cause to unite them.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:17 pm to truthbetold
Could either team beat Grambling or McNeese this year?
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:18 pm to LSULM FAN
quote:Yep, I guess Utah just doesn't want to go in the right direction like Tech does.
Your post earlier about Utah/Utah St. says it all. Why do they continue to play every year when Utah is by far the better program and has dominated the series much more than Tech has dominated ULM? Yet they continue to play. There must be some interest in the yearly matchup. What a concept!!!
Also, Cincinnati will play the Miami Red Hawks in Oxford, Ohio, this year. Why? BECAUSE THEY PLAY EVERY YEAR, PERIOD.
Cincinnati will probably be in the Orange or Sugar Bowl this year, too.
But I guess Cincy just doesn't want to go in the right direction.
Hey, Tech. Over here.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:20 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
quote:
Could either team beat Grambling or McNeese this year?
Either team could put Kige at quarterback and beat Grambling. SWAC football is the worst of the worst.
LA College would give Grambling a game.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 10:24 pm to truthbetold
quote:Doubt it. The Buffaloes haven't played in Fort Collins in about 15 years. They either play a home game in Boulder or a neutral-site game at Mile High. Either way, that's a rivalry that stretches back to the 1890's; not playing that one would be a crime.
Could also be the case in Colorado, but I'm not sure.
Posted on 9/8/09 at 11:43 pm to NYTETYME
I'm an LSU grad...and I tend to agree that Tech is fearful of ULM. Tech thinks they will beat LSU everytime they play them....only to get trounced.
Monroe-Ruston aren't exactly booming economies..and the 30 mile rivalry was also a big boost for the economies. Isn't like playing ULM would ruin Tech's chances at a BCS bowl. Let's face it, both teams suck compared to the flagship institution in the state, and will never really amount to crap. The rivalry is good for the local economy...good for the fans, and it is just stupid that they don't play the game.
Monroe-Ruston aren't exactly booming economies..and the 30 mile rivalry was also a big boost for the economies. Isn't like playing ULM would ruin Tech's chances at a BCS bowl. Let's face it, both teams suck compared to the flagship institution in the state, and will never really amount to crap. The rivalry is good for the local economy...good for the fans, and it is just stupid that they don't play the game.
Popular
Back to top


1


