- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So.. about that Longhorn Network, hows that doing again?
Posted on 8/22/12 at 9:47 am to ProjectP2294
Posted on 8/22/12 at 9:47 am to ProjectP2294
What I remember Danielson for the most is his "analysis" of opponents in 2006 when taking the 4th quarter to get UF into the title game (I'm not denying they didn't belong). He went through and just said SEC Team 1 is better than Big X Team 1 on down the list...then 3 of those matchups happened and the Big X won 2 of them...of course the only one people remember the SEC won 
Posted on 8/22/12 at 9:52 am to Buckeye06
How exactly is the LHN screwing UT's fans? Curious, not a flame.
Posted on 8/22/12 at 9:56 am to Tigerbait337
quote:
but no one can break down a game like Gary, pair that with his calling ability and that's why I think he is among the best right, and has been for a good while.
Jesse Palmer >>>> Gary. Yeah, I said it.
Posted on 8/22/12 at 9:59 am to Keltic Tiger
quote:
How exactly is the LHN screwing UT's fans? Curious, not a flame.
Because they all acting like they were doing UT fans a public service by giving them their own network. Then ESPN went to the local TX providers and tried to rape them by charging ridiculous carry rates and/or demanded them to pick up a bunch of other ESPN networks they didn't want in order to get LHN.
I mean, come on. All those providers in Texas aren't deliberately trying to screw UT fans. They just refused to be played by the cable networks.
The NFL Network did the same thing. They gave themselves Thursday Night games, tripled their rates, and expected every cable provider to bend over and take it on their terms.
Personally, I'd rather have CBS College Sports, BTN and the Mountain West channel over yet another ESPN channel we don't need here on Cox.
Posted on 8/22/12 at 10:04 am to lsutigers1992
Also, some UT games are not available to a lot of fans in Texas because they don't have access to the LHN. In the end, it's always the fans who have to bend over and take it.
I live in Dallas, and I don't get LHN.
I live in Dallas, and I don't get LHN.
Posted on 8/22/12 at 10:07 am to lsutigers1992
quote:
Then ESPN went to the local TX providers and tried to rape them by charging ridiculous carry rates and/or demanded them to pick up a bunch of other ESPN networks they didn't want in order to get LHN.
Did you ever read the inside espn book? Strong arming television providers is what they do...their monetary exploits are 90% of the book and they act like they are doing everyone a favor.
Posted on 8/22/12 at 10:12 am to TigerStripes06
That's what I hate about all these fights over carrying networks, like Viacom and DirecTV, AMC and Dish, etc. etc. etc..
"Contact your cable provider and tell them that you want......."
They don't tell you the whole story. The cable network is often at fault or at least carry at least as much of the responsibility.
To use the Viacom example, they should tell the viewers to "Contact your cable provider and tell them you want your rates to go up 3 or 4 dollars a month just so that we can have a dozen more channels on your cable system that you're not even going to watch anyway."
"Contact your cable provider and tell them that you want......."
They don't tell you the whole story. The cable network is often at fault or at least carry at least as much of the responsibility.
To use the Viacom example, they should tell the viewers to "Contact your cable provider and tell them you want your rates to go up 3 or 4 dollars a month just so that we can have a dozen more channels on your cable system that you're not even going to watch anyway."
Posted on 8/22/12 at 10:12 am to Keltic Tiger
quote:
How exactly is the LHN screwing UT's fans?
Here's the deal - for football, a couple games each year (early non-con), which have previously been on something like Fox Sports SW or pay-per-view if not picked up by any cable provider are now on the LHN. So if you don't get it, you can't watch it (there are bars in Austin, Dallas, Houston, San Antonio that have it). For basketball, same deal but it's about 8-10 games I think. For baseball, whereas all home games not televised were previously streamed online (on a crappy feed with maybe 2 camera angles), these are all on the LHN. So for these and other sports, games that were previously free online or on a cable channel are no longer available.
This main issue is this - ESPN has demanded a price per subscriber that is relatively high (generally, ESPN subscriber prices are incredibly high compared to other cable channels) AND that the network be carried on a basic package as opposed to a premium package. Providers don't want to pay it and currently ESPN won't let them pick it up and charge a premium for it (that may change soon).
Posted on 8/22/12 at 10:22 am to OrangeBlood
Here are the issues:
1. The NCAA putting a stop to the LHN's plan to televise high school games (more specifically, games which feature longhorn recruits). That would have been almost half of the channel's appeal. ESPN was not powerful enough to get the NCAA to back down and lost a significant amount of face here.
2. Like was said earlier, there simply isn't national appeal for a network dedicated to one school 24/7.
3. ESPN's refusal to take a deal like the Big 10 and PAC 12 networks...basic package in those conferences' states, premium package everywhere else. They wanted it forced on the BASIC cable package.
4. ESPN strongly underestimated the backlash from item #3. The number of customers "demanding" the LHN was outnumbered almost 6 to 1 by the number of customers threatening to cancel their service if the channel was added to their lineup.
5. Texas' actual fan base. The majority of Texas fans are bandwagon at best...or illegal Mexicans. There simply aren't enough fans of the school who care about anything besides football...certainly not enough to merit a 24/7 sports network for all other sports.
This year is making things that much worse when you take in the fact that Texas A&M's first three games are NATIONALLY TELEVISED while the only reason Texas' THIRD game is televised on anything other than the longhorn network is because they're playing an SEC opponent. A&M is guaranteed to have more games available to everyone than Texas is...even if the SCSU game and SHSU game are only available on a PPV basis.
Time Warner's acceptance of the PAC 12 network was a proverbial slap in the face to ESPN and the Longhorn Network.
1. The NCAA putting a stop to the LHN's plan to televise high school games (more specifically, games which feature longhorn recruits). That would have been almost half of the channel's appeal. ESPN was not powerful enough to get the NCAA to back down and lost a significant amount of face here.
2. Like was said earlier, there simply isn't national appeal for a network dedicated to one school 24/7.
3. ESPN's refusal to take a deal like the Big 10 and PAC 12 networks...basic package in those conferences' states, premium package everywhere else. They wanted it forced on the BASIC cable package.
4. ESPN strongly underestimated the backlash from item #3. The number of customers "demanding" the LHN was outnumbered almost 6 to 1 by the number of customers threatening to cancel their service if the channel was added to their lineup.
5. Texas' actual fan base. The majority of Texas fans are bandwagon at best...or illegal Mexicans. There simply aren't enough fans of the school who care about anything besides football...certainly not enough to merit a 24/7 sports network for all other sports.
This year is making things that much worse when you take in the fact that Texas A&M's first three games are NATIONALLY TELEVISED while the only reason Texas' THIRD game is televised on anything other than the longhorn network is because they're playing an SEC opponent. A&M is guaranteed to have more games available to everyone than Texas is...even if the SCSU game and SHSU game are only available on a PPV basis.
Time Warner's acceptance of the PAC 12 network was a proverbial slap in the face to ESPN and the Longhorn Network.
This post was edited on 8/22/12 at 10:26 am
Posted on 8/22/12 at 10:56 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
The majority of Texas fans are bandwagon at best
This for sure, but they buy a lot of t-shirts.
Posted on 8/22/12 at 11:29 am to LSUFanNTX
quote:
This for sure, but they buy a lot of t-shirts.
T-shirt fans stop caring once "their team" starts losing.
Posted on 8/22/12 at 11:46 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
5. Texas' actual fan base. The majority of Texas fans are bandwagon at best...or illegal Mexicans. There simply aren't enough fans of the school who care about anything besides football...certainly not enough to merit a 24/7 sports network for all other sports.
I don't see how they ever thought this was a good idea. No one outside of Central Texas gives two shits about the Longhorns. I've personally seen far more A&M fans in Houston than Longhorn fans.
Plus, they straight up suck. The glory days are over. Vince is long gone. Colt is busy holding clipboards as the 3rd string QB. There are no superstars or nationally known players on that roster in site.
And outside of the football program there is very little interest in UT sports outside of central Texas much less nationally.
So they just come off looking like the stingy douchey older brother bullying their smaller siblings.
Meanwhile A&M has come out smelling like roses being in the SEC and getting far more national coverage now.
Posted on 8/22/12 at 11:59 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Time Warner's acceptance of the PAC 12 network was a proverbial slap in the face to ESPN and the Longhorn Network.
I've been watching this channel and its actually pretty good. I like it better than the Big 10 Network for sure.
Only issue is here in Dallas Time Warner put it all the way up at 808 right next to the porn channels.
I don't really see it as much of a slap in the face when you look at what each channel offers though. The Pac12Net has much more content than the LHN. They already have 8 football games scheduled for the first 3 weeks of the year.
Posted on 8/22/12 at 3:20 pm to Dr RC
I agree,once you've read the book Inside ESPN, you'll really understand that it is all bout money, money & more money. ESPN initially had to pay providers to put its programs on and once they made that change, it's all been downhill for the network as far as practically printing its own money. All those millons of dollars they are paying conferences to cover their games comes predominately from the subscribers; the ad money brings in a lot smaller amount in comparison.
Posted on 8/22/12 at 3:52 pm to Keltic Tiger
Just read that the LHN isn't the only thing screwing over Longhorn fans outside the state of Texas:
Recently, Comcast announced that their Comcast SportsNet channel will no longer carry any FSN programming.
That means that anyone who has Comcast won't be able to see a single Fox Sports Net College Football game (Big 12, PAC 12, OR CUSA).
Recently, Comcast announced that their Comcast SportsNet channel will no longer carry any FSN programming.
That means that anyone who has Comcast won't be able to see a single Fox Sports Net College Football game (Big 12, PAC 12, OR CUSA).
Posted on 8/22/12 at 4:17 pm to Baloo
quote:
The fact they don't even have full penetration in Texas is just sad, though.
Limp dicks.
Posted on 8/22/12 at 5:01 pm to DayBowBow
I think its hilarious that aTm is making out better while the LHN can't even get traction. The worm has turned.
Posted on 8/22/12 at 6:07 pm to Suck Out West
quote:
I think its hilarious that aTm is making out better while the LHN can't even get traction. The worm has turned.
It's even more hilarious that the thing which was supposed to cement Texas' status as the dominant power in college football has not only made them a national joke, but finally convinced the "powers that be" at A&M to wake up and do something to set us apart from them.
No matter how we perform on the field, we GUARANTEED that we will never have a year like 2009, in which we only had the following games televised:
Game 4: Arkansas (ESPN2)
Game 5: Oklahoma State (FSN National)
Game 6: at Kansas State (Fox College Sports - Central)
Game 9: at Colorado (Fox College Sports - Central)
Game 10: at Oklahoma (FSN National)
Game 12: Texas (ESPN)
Bowl Game: vs. Georgia (ESPN2)
We were the only Big 12 team NOT televised on ABC that year and the least televised team in all of FBS Football. (in fact there were FCS schools who had more games televised that season)
Posted on 8/22/12 at 6:12 pm to Tigerbait337
Texas has always considered itself more than what it really is.
It's not "A Whole Other Country". A lot of morons there just think it is.
It's not "A Whole Other Country". A lot of morons there just think it is.
Popular
Back to top


1






