Started By
Message

Should basketball coaches be able to decline free throws?

Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:05 am
Posted by CubsFanBudMan
Member since Jul 2008
5065 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:05 am
Would it improve the end of basketball games if coaches were allowed to decline free throws, and inbound the ball instead? The rule would have to be fine tuned to decide when that option is available. Maybe only for non-shooting fouls in the last minute or two of the game.
Posted by WildcatMike
Lexington, KY
Member since Dec 2005
41531 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:05 am to
Sure, can we eliminate the DH from MLB?
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17438 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:06 am to
NO.

The game is about putting the ball in the hoop.

Learn to do it.
Posted by Rhino5
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2014
28898 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:08 am to
Eliminate a free shot. Brilliant.
Posted by WildcatMike
Lexington, KY
Member since Dec 2005
41531 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:09 am to
Well said Mr Perfect.
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40780 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:10 am to
How about we just hold players accountable and make them practice shooting free throws?

But I will play along. If you are going to give a coach the choice, and he chooses not to shoot the ft's on a non shooting foul, they turn the ball over to the other team. They don't get possession of the ball. If its a shooting foul, then they get possession if they choose not to shoot.
This post was edited on 1/27/16 at 10:11 am
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:11 am to
No.
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
11312 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:13 am to
Teams should have a designated ft shooter. Nothing worse than watching some 50%er clang it off the goal.
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40780 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Nothing worse than watching some 50%er clang it off the goal.


Then the coach should take them off the floor when the hack a player shite starts.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:15 am to
I don't see why not. If you're fouled, you shouldn't be forced to take the shot when you think retaining possession is more advantageous.
Posted by CubsFanBudMan
Member since Jul 2008
5065 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Eliminate a free shot. Brilliant.


It would be a strategy decision. If a foul is committed before the inbound, the team that is fouled may want to run time off the clock, and risk the inbound play again. It would also give the other team a chance for a steal on the inbound.

If a team is down by 3 with under 10 seconds and has the ball, a lot of coaches will try to foul before a 3 pointer is attempted. This would give the losing team another chance to tie the game.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:21 am to
quote:

NO.

The game is about putting the ball in the hoop.



By that same argument, the game isn't about fouling either...
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Would it improve the end of basketball games if coaches were allowed to decline free throws, and inbound the ball instead? The rule would have to be fine tuned to decide when that option is available. Maybe only for non-shooting fouls in the last minute or two of the game.


While I understand the "he should just make his free throws" argument, I would support anything that ends Hack-a-Shaq. No one can deny that it makes the game unwatchable.
Posted by fightingtiger2335
heh?
Member since Aug 2007
61157 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:24 am to
quote:

By that same argument, the game isn't about fouling either...


Huh? Yes it is..its why after so many fouls you get penalized and your opponent gets free uncontested shot to achieve games objective which is to put ball in basket. Fouling is very much part of game
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:25 am to
Game objective is to win the game. Ever consider the possibility that retaining possession would be more advantageous than shooting a free throw?

Why not give the coach an option?
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40780 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:27 am to
quote:

By that same argument, the game isn't about fouling either...


It is. Why else do teams foul at the end of the game to attempt to catch up? I mean what is the real difference between fouling the guy with the ball on purpose vs fouling another player who doesn't have the ball? It's all intentional. It's not like its something that just happens like common fouls.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:27 am to
quote:



By that same argument, the game isn't about fouling either...


Yes it is. Especially in a strategic sense.

Ever heard of the concept of a "foul to give" at the end of a quarter?

Teams foul to prevent fast break opportunities all the time as well.
This post was edited on 1/27/16 at 10:29 am
Posted by fightingtiger2335
heh?
Member since Aug 2007
61157 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Game objective is to win the game.


Ugh if thats your argument then i cant discuss it. Its a game of skill...you have to put it in the basket more than the other team...without the objective of putting it in the basket teams mine as well go for touchdowns and drop kicks. ...what a lazy statement....every sport has an objective..yes winning i what u want to do but that isny the objective of the game itself...wanting to win and shooting a puck in a soccet net wont get you anywhere
Posted by CubsFanBudMan
Member since Jul 2008
5065 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Yes it is..its why after so many fouls you get penalized and your opponent gets free uncontested shot to achieve games objective which is to put ball in basket.


And what is the opponent would prefer to have possession of the ball instead of those free uncontested shots? Shouldn't the victim's desires be considered?
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40780 posts
Posted on 1/27/16 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Why not give the coach an option?


Because Free throws, just like any shot are a chance to score. Possession is absolute and gives an unfair advantage to the team gaining possession of the ball.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram