Started By
Message

NFL owners to vote on sky judge, onside kick alternative May 28

Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:10 am
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:10 am
LINK

quote:

The competition committee sent a report to teams last month, in which it stated support for further analysis of on-field officials being assisted by officiating personnel who would have access to a video feed. The officiating department is working with on-field officials to figure out how video feeds could assist them. So, even if owners do not pass either of the new proposals outright next week, it is likely a version of some kind of addition to the officiating crew could be tested in the preseason for possible further implementation.


Not really sure what to think of the sky judge. Seems like it could potentially lengthen games if used very liberally.

quote:

The other intriguing proposal involves providing an alternative to the onside kick, which has largely faded out of the game since changes were made prior to the 2018 season that prohibited kickoff teams from getting a running start. That change was made for safety reasons, but it also made it nearly impossible to successfully execute an onside kick. In the last two seasons, just 10.4 percent of onside kicks were recovered.

There is now some momentum for a proposal from the Philadelphia Eagles -- which has in the past been sniffed at by some as too gimmicky -- which would allow the team that is trailing in the game a way to maintain possession after scoring by successfully converting a fourth-and-15 play from its own 25-yard line. That could be done a maximum of twice per game.
This post was edited on 5/26/20 at 11:51 am
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
102973 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:12 am to
Ban any form of onside kick. So stupid and gimmicky way to have undeserving teams win.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115468 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:13 am to
quote:

NFL owners to vote on sky judge


Definitely want, as long as its not Al fricking Riveron

quote:

onside kick alternative May 28



Don't love
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164042 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:14 am to
quote:

There is now some momentum for a proposal from the Philadelphia Eagles -- which has in the past been sniffed at by some as too gimmicky -- which would allow the team that is trailing in the game a way to maintain possession after scoring by successfully converting a fourth-and-15 play from its own 25-yard line. That could be done a maximum of twice per game.

Would be the gayest thing ever. Whoever proposed that needs to be shot.
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
35701 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:18 am to
F that 4th and 15 proposal. Sounds like something the XFL would do.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164042 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:19 am to
The shark would officially be jumped.
Posted by 225Tyga
Member since Oct 2013
15779 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:19 am to
Love the onside kick alternative option. I'll vote for it.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:20 am to
quote:

The shark would officially be jumped.


It hasn’t already?
Posted by Diseasefreeforall
Member since Oct 2012
5488 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:24 am to
Why not just limit the amount of players the receiving team can have within 30 yards of the line where the ball was kicked off to even the chance between kicking and receiving teams?


Also, anyone else remember when the Hula Bowl used to have the losing team receive the kickoff after it scored?
This post was edited on 5/26/20 at 11:25 am
Posted by jlnoles79
Member since Jan 2014
12798 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Ban any form of onside kick. So stupid and gimmicky way to have undeserving teams win.


This is ridiculous
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34850 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:31 am to
quote:

nearly impossible to successfully execute an onside kick


quote:

In the last two seasons, just 10.4 percent of onside kicks were recovered.


quote:

nearly impossible


quote:

10.4 percent



sigh
This post was edited on 5/26/20 at 11:32 am
Posted by Sponge
Member since Nov 2018
3749 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:37 am to
Seriously

10-15% is probably where it should be


Or you could play the Saints and your % automatically goes way up
Posted by AHM21
Member since Feb 2008
24474 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Ban any form of onside kick. So stupid and gimmicky way to have undeserving teams win.



It's one of the most exciting plays in football, even if the success rate is extremely low.
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:38 am to
frick the NFL, it's refs, it's judges, and it's review process
Posted by GeauxTigersGo
Member since Dec 2009
1812 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:41 am to
quote:

10.4 percent


I think the Falcons accounted for 90% of that number in their game vs the saints.
Posted by Sauce Castieaux
Asheville, NC.
Member since Nov 2015
5017 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:46 am to
quote:

I think the Falcons accounted for 90% of that number in their game vs the saints.


Was not just the Falcon game. Think the Bears recoverd back to back as well vs Saints
Posted by Starchild
Member since May 2010
13550 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:52 am to
I’m always for any help to fix the terrible officiating in the league. Not a fan of the onside kick alternative though. 10% seems like a solid number for them to be around.

This also appears to be as good a time as any to remind of tGOAT onside kick and one of the ballsiest calls in Super Bowl history

Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34850 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 11:56 am to
The thing I really hate about the 4th and 15 proposal is that it gives more ability to a possibly incompetent officiating crew to change a game.

There are far too many ticky-tack penalties that result in an automatic first down for me to sign off on this.

You could basically give a team a free possession with one illegal hands to the face.
Posted by PeteRose
Hall of Fame
Member since Aug 2014
16831 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

thing I really hate about the 4th and 15 proposal is that it gives more ability to a possibly incompetent officiating crew to change a game.


Honest cold truth: Owners just care about ratings and revenue. What fans hate or don’t hate is secondary.
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19232 posts
Posted on 5/26/20 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

an any form of onside kick. So stupid and gimmicky way to have undeserving teams win.


The game is 1/3rd offense, 1/3rd defense, 1/3rd special teams.

If they can't perform on special teams they deserve to lose.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram