- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NFL needs to change interference penalty
Posted on 12/16/12 at 10:59 pm to yankeelover
Posted on 12/16/12 at 10:59 pm to yankeelover
Because at every other level of football you see DBs committing pi downfield.......
This post was edited on 12/16/12 at 10:59 pm
0
Posted on 12/16/12 at 10:59 pm to jdg91878
quote:
What about not letting a pretty boy QB spike the ball in disgust. That should have been unsportsmanlike on Brady. Fuking bullshite special treatment.
Lol u so mad
Posted on 12/16/12 at 11:09 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
What about not letting a pretty boy QB spike the ball in disgust. That should have been unsportsmanlike on Brady. Fuking bull shite special treatment.
Posted on 12/16/12 at 11:09 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
Lol u so mad
He cried about it in another thread also, he's not a Tom Brady fan
Posted on 12/17/12 at 12:08 am to jdg91878
You think Brady is a pretty boy?
To each his own.
To each his own.
Posted on 12/17/12 at 12:16 am to yankeelover
No. I wish College would change to this rule.
It is a stupid penalty with it only being a 15 yard penalty. Defensive backs are taught if they get beat deep it is better to interfere and get a 15 yard penalty then it is to give up a big gain or get beat for a touchdown.
It is a stupid penalty with it only being a 15 yard penalty. Defensive backs are taught if they get beat deep it is better to interfere and get a 15 yard penalty then it is to give up a big gain or get beat for a touchdown.
Posted on 12/17/12 at 12:20 am to Icansee4miles
quote:
Brady apparently can do and say whatever the frick he wants without fear of any action being taken. Just like the rest of their organization.
Posted on 12/17/12 at 12:23 am to yankeelover
The NFL will make a rule that decreases scoring??
Never...
Never...
Posted on 12/17/12 at 12:25 am to Icansee4miles
quote:
Brady apparently can do and say whatever the frick he wants without fear of any action being taken. Just like the rest of their organization.
Aint nuttin but a G thang
Posted on 12/17/12 at 12:26 am to yankeelover
Why not differentiate between flagrant and non-flagrant?
NF (sorry) -- 10 yds
F -- spot of infraction
NF (sorry) -- 10 yds
F -- spot of infraction
Posted on 12/17/12 at 12:45 am to Kafka
quote:
Why not differentiate between flagrant and non-flagrant?
NF (sorry) -- 15 yds
F -- spot of infraction
I have always wanted this, but keep non-flagrant at 15 yards and an automatic first down. Of course, then it becomes of a judgment call. Should flagrancy be challenged?
Posted on 12/17/12 at 7:17 am to Vicks Kennel Club
IMHo the way the officials call it is the problem. dont even think about letting a big name receiver get up and call for the flag cause you know the official will throw it.
Posted on 12/17/12 at 7:33 am to yankeelover
quote:
Yes. Although that would hurt all those 80 yard throws we see every week.
...that's not the point. The defense should not benefit by committing a penalty, that is what the spot foul helps to ensure.
Posted on 12/17/12 at 7:51 am to brgfather129
quote:
...that's not the point. The defense should not benefit by committing a penalty, that is what the spot foul helps to ensure.
I get what you're saying, but what is fair about a 50+yard penalty on a pass that is arguable catchable and the contact is incidental? The offense shouldn't be rewards just for chucking it deep and praying their guy trips and gets the call.
Posted on 12/17/12 at 7:55 am to chief420
quote:
I get what you're saying, but what is fair about a 50+yard penalty on a pass that is arguable catchable and the contact is incidental? The offense shouldn't be rewards just for chucking it deep and praying their guy trips and gets the call.
Then that is a bad call, and you shouldn't change the rules because the officiating is poor. The officiating needs to improve.
Posted on 12/17/12 at 7:56 am to kc8876
quote:
Play was dead, couldn't call a delay of game
When would a player spike the ball in live play?
:jagsfan:
Posted on 12/17/12 at 8:45 am to Kafka
quote:
Why not differentiate between flagrant and non-flagrant?
NF (sorry) -- 10 yds
F -- spot of infraction
I've long been a fan of this. You would definitely end up with a much higher percentage of non-flagrant.
Posted on 12/17/12 at 9:09 am to Melvin
Did not read the entire thread so sorry if I'm repeating. I hear the "they'll just tackle receivers" argument when this comes up but college has the rule and you never see this done in college. What you see ALOT in the pros is bullshite PI calls that gives a team a ridiculous amount of yards. And by the way 15 and an automatic first is a stiff penalty.
Posted on 12/17/12 at 9:13 am to Algerian
quote:
Did not read the entire thread so sorry if I'm repeating. I hear the "they'll just tackle receivers" argument when this comes up but college has the rule and you never see this done in college.
I actually see what I would deem as "flagrant" PI's in college football a good bit.
Posted on 12/17/12 at 9:14 am to yankeelover
Lots of rustled jimmies in this thread
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News