- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MLB Offseason Thread: Hosmer to the Padres, Twins get a starter
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:25 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:25 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
Nice move for Rockies
1
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:29 am to tduecen
Bummed the Cubs didnt re-sign Davis. He was money.
Great move for the Rockies though
Great move for the Rockies though
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:33 am to BCMCubs
Davis is very risky to me but kudos to the Rockies for having a clear plan for this offseason and their ownership willing to spend to execute it
Will be interesting to see where Holland goes now as I think most people assumed he was going back to Colorado
Will be interesting to see where Holland goes now as I think most people assumed he was going back to Colorado
This post was edited on 12/29/17 at 10:35 am
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:38 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
Rockies are my side team since Ive lived in CO. Last season and this one coming has been the most Ive gotten excited about them in a while.
Like you said it seems there is a clear plan going forward, and the Monfort’s are putting down some dough to make it happen
Like you said it seems there is a clear plan going forward, and the Monfort’s are putting down some dough to make it happen
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:38 am to BCMCubs
Cubs saving that money for Harper next year. Make it happen, Theo.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:44 am to AlexTheGreat
Ya Davis was too hittable at times last year. Velo Down Glad cubs passed
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:46 am to BCMCubs
It makes sense, they have a young but promising rotation that is cheap right now. Spend to stack up the bullpen behind it, and I think they could use a cheaper backend vet that could eat innings, someone like Jason Vargas, Jaime Garcia or Hellickson
They have the system to go get a starter at the deadline if it comes to that
They have the system to go get a starter at the deadline if it comes to that
Posted on 12/29/17 at 1:53 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
Posted on 12/29/17 at 4:21 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
I was hoping the STL would sign Davis. I didn’t expect him to get that much though.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 4:22 pm to CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
We want Holland, still frontrunners for him.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 4:27 pm to UltimateHog
Holland was horrible after the break. I wonder why there is seemingly no interest in Moustakas?
Posted on 12/29/17 at 4:29 pm to CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
And an all star before the break, most relate his 2nd half to coming back from TJ surgery and not having the stamina built back up for the full season and don't consider it an issue going forward. CO probably should have used him less early on to save him for later in the year.
We'll either sign him or trade for Colome.
We'll either sign him or trade for Colome.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 4:35 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
Cubs saving that money for Harper next year. Make it happen, Theo.
Stanton to NY, was only way this was possible, but i'm hearing Dodgers will make a big play for him, and have the $$$$ coming off the books to offer him $ that the Cubs could only dream of offering.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 4:35 pm to UltimateHog
I’d be OK signing Reed. I wonder what the trade for Colome would be? I doubt Rays would want Grichuk.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 4:36 pm to SeeeeK
Mets, Cubs, Dodgers, Nationals, Braves plenty of teams will be throwing money at Harper including the Yankees
Posted on 12/29/17 at 4:49 pm to SeeeeK
The Cubs are about to get a multi-billion dollar TV deal. Money comparable to the Dodgers will be there.
It'll all just depend on where he wants to get paid 400+ million.
It'll all just depend on where he wants to get paid 400+ million.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 4:57 pm to JetsetNuggs
I miss the days when I could watch every Scrubs/White Sox game on WGN or Braves game on TBS.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 5:18 pm to JetsetNuggs
I do wonder with these contracts going up and up and up, how much it'll factor in for LA taxes.
How much would he lose over other places just for taxes on a $400m deal?
As a Raiders fan I've read quite a bit about that factor in the NFL with them going from Oakland to tax free Vegas already popping up in long term talks with players.
How much would he lose over other places just for taxes on a $400m deal?
As a Raiders fan I've read quite a bit about that factor in the NFL with them going from Oakland to tax free Vegas already popping up in long term talks with players.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 5:24 pm to UltimateHog
quote:depends. He would lose a little under 20 million with the cubs and would lose a little over 53 million with the dodgers
How much would he lose over other places just for taxes on a $400m deal?
This post was edited on 12/29/17 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 12/29/17 at 6:18 pm to JetsetNuggs
Dodgers tv deal is a disaster for TWC, do you really think with cable going to crap, that someone will give the cubs hundreds of millions a year for a decade plus?
Page 69 of 108
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News