- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Manchin and Tuberville unveil bill making sweeping changes to college sports
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:46 am to nicholastiger
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:46 am to nicholastiger
quote:
As far as healthcare goes, why should schools have to bear that cost after playing days are over?
Maybe if they have some sort of injury while playing and again that is a big maybe.
Something that I always thought was kind of crappy was when a player committed to a school and suffered a career ending injury in High School they no longer had the scholarship offer. Maybe they should receive a scholarship that doesn't count towards the active roster but instead of playing they can serve as a trainer or in some other capacity in the Athlectic Department. It doesn't happen that often so it shouldn't be that big of a burden for the school.
0
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:48 am to TrueTigerTale
quote:
The NCAA would also have oversight over NIL activities and the authority to investigate them.
So when the dust settles from realignment, the 24 team SEC will exit from the NCAA & do whatever they want!
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:51 am to JimTiger72
quote:
So when the dust settles from realignment, the 24 team SEC will exit from the NCAA & do whatever they want!
The 24 team SEC will will be making the highest revenue of any institutions, if passed even more high-school players will flocking to the SEC because of the amount of revenue involved in paying their out of pocket expenses after graduation. The rich still get richer.
This post was edited on 7/26/23 at 9:55 am
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:56 am to TrueTigerTale
I believe changes are needed, but this sounds terrible. 3 years before you can transfer? No way this passes. Capping NIL deals seems unlawful to me.
If there was some way to cut out the school collectives and make the deals strictly between the businesses and the athletes, I'd be all for it. 2 years before a student athlete can transfer seems reasonable.
If there was some way to cut out the school collectives and make the deals strictly between the businesses and the athletes, I'd be all for it. 2 years before a student athlete can transfer seems reasonable.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 9:58 am to TrueTigerTale
Another reason for term limits.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:55 am to JimTiger72
quote:
So when the dust settles from realignment, the 24 team SEC will exit from the NCAA & do whatever they want!
then they can join the new NCAAA(because some entity has to set the rules) and we start this all over again! brilliant!
like i said in the MSB version of this thread, states are literally passing laws prohibiting the NCAA from investigating schools in their state.
a set of national rules has to come from somewhere and the NCAA cant do it legally, so...
also where does it say they are capping NIL deals? admittedly only skimmed the article but didnt catch it anywhere.
This post was edited on 7/26/23 at 10:56 am
Posted on 7/26/23 at 10:56 am to nitwit
quote:
Setting all politics aside, Tuberville is a classless, ignorant, POS.
DITTO, a bad former CFB HC now trying to play US Senator...
Posted on 7/26/23 at 11:00 am to tiger81
quote:
3 years works, a commitment should mean something. Baseball makes you stay three years.
College student can transfer to another school without any repercussions, outside of maybe a few classes not carrying over, why does it have to be different just because a student wants to play sports?
Also, say a player commits to play a sport under a specific coach at a specific university, that coach leaves for a variety of reasons, why should the player be "stuck" at the school if the coach/school couldn't keep their commitment to player?
Posted on 7/26/23 at 11:04 am to ProjectP2294
they have to sit out a year b4 being able to play. After 3 years and they decide to transfer, they are able to play immediately
Posted on 7/26/23 at 11:07 am to Tiger2tiger97
Even if it passes, this bill has no chance of surviving legal challenges.
Pandora’s box has been opened and it will never be closed again.
I generally abhor fatalism, but sometimes it’s the truth.
Pandora’s box has been opened and it will never be closed again.
I generally abhor fatalism, but sometimes it’s the truth.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 11:22 am to TrueTigerTale
Rejecting the insane NIL deals is key and clutch move. Pass this today.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 11:25 am to TrueTigerTale
quote:
transfers will have to attend college 3 years before transferring
This just benefits the big schools.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 11:33 am to TrueTigerTale
This bill was not needed and shouldn’t even be touched by Congress.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 11:35 am to nola tiger lsu
quote:
Rejecting the insane NIL deals is key and clutch move. Pass this today.
this is such a stupid take
you havent even read the bill
but this has wide ranging effects on other things.
essentially the government in telling you, no matter the industry you work in, we can limit your income based on your name, image and likeness.
it is 100% non capitalistic, 100% an over reach and 100% will be over turned in the supreme court again!!!
Posted on 7/26/23 at 11:35 am to TrueTigerTale
Make it "if" you have an NIL deal you are required to stay 2 years at that school.
AND....close the portal as it is. You can transfer but sit out a year.
That stops this illegal tampering.
AND....close the portal as it is. You can transfer but sit out a year.
That stops this illegal tampering.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 11:38 am to lsudirtbag
quote:
Make it "if" you have an NIL deal you are required to stay 2 years at that school.
Wouldn’t that mean that NIL is an enticement to attend, which is currently illegal?
This post was edited on 7/26/23 at 11:39 am
Posted on 7/26/23 at 11:56 am to jrobic4
quote:
You have guys announcing Xfers before they complete 12 hours of college
2 guys i knew left school A for school B after a week of football practice. they knew they would never play.
they seemed to believe they could do it as classes were just starting.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 12:16 pm to lsu777
quote:
essentially the government in telling you, no matter the industry you work in, we can limit your income based on your name, image and likeness.
Ok
Posted on 7/26/23 at 12:19 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
Do you really think the NCAA can prohibit NIL deals, that will be another lawsuit.
The only thing they may be able to rein in is the collectives.
That is exactly what they are trying to accomplish. Regulate greed, not stop it. The collective is now RECRUITING players to schools based on revenue. If schools get the hell sanctioned out of them for such greed it will be a deterrent.
Posted on 7/26/23 at 12:35 pm to Jack Daniel
I don't think they are trying to cap the amount of $$$ of NIL deals. More so make sure they are legit. A lot of these "NIL" deals are really just pay for play deals.
NIL should be for players who have actually played in some games IMO. They are giving more NIL deals to recruits then players. The recruits are nobodies and have no name image likeness dollars yet (unless big influencers on social media). NIL was meant for guys that had planned and were making their football teams more profitable by being good.
NIL should be for players who have actually played in some games IMO. They are giving more NIL deals to recruits then players. The recruits are nobodies and have no name image likeness dollars yet (unless big influencers on social media). NIL was meant for guys that had planned and were making their football teams more profitable by being good.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News