- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kenny Atkinson: Cavs 'analytically' winning series vs. Knicks
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:18 am
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:18 am
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:33 am to SPEEDY
A James Harden led team will always look good analytically
Posted on 5/25/26 at 11:59 am to SPEEDY
The quote is terrible, but in context he’s defending why he has hope his team can win game 4.
Posted on 5/25/26 at 2:52 pm to SPEEDY
I’m all about analytics… I love data.
But the thing about the playoffs is that the better teams find ways to win games even when we have a difficult time explaining why based on the data.
The data might chalk it up to luck. But really, the best teams find a way to rise to the occasion and make their own luck whereas the pretenders fold.
But the thing about the playoffs is that the better teams find ways to win games even when we have a difficult time explaining why based on the data.
The data might chalk it up to luck. But really, the best teams find a way to rise to the occasion and make their own luck whereas the pretenders fold.
Posted on 5/25/26 at 3:42 pm to SPEEDY
Analytics ain’t the final score, Kenny.
Posted on 5/25/26 at 3:56 pm to SPEEDY
Atkinson is boom’s alter ego!
Posted on 5/25/26 at 4:01 pm to PrimeTime Money
The thing you have to remember about analytics is there is zero accounting for downside scenarios factored into them. I also have no problem with the more specific types of information they can provide but when it becomes a philosophical dogma you get these silly comments from an Atkins or a Cashman in baseball where they can’t seem to differentiate between wining and losing the game. Analytics are just a tool like any other set of statistics.
This post was edited on 5/25/26 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 5/25/26 at 4:39 pm to SPEEDY
Even if it’s true (I don’t know if it is), it’s big loser energy to mention it while down 3-0
Posted on 5/25/26 at 5:04 pm to Madking
quote:The problem I have with how coaches use analytics is that analytics are about long-term trends.
The thing you have to remember about analytics is there is zero accounting for downside scenarios factored into them. I also have no problem with the more specific types of information they can provide but when it becomes a philosophical dogma you get these silly comments from an Atkins or a Cashman in baseball where they can’t seem to differentiate between wining and losing the game. Analytics are just a tool like any other set of statistics.
The probability changes when you are dealing with a specific opponent in a small number of games. It’s like they look at a chart based on numbers accumulated over a season and use that to make decisions. That’s stupid and not how the data should be used.
Analytics should be used as a general tool to figure out the best way to play. But when it comes down to the small sample size of the playoffs, it comes down to players making plays and hitting shots and getting stops. It becomes less about playing the numbers and more about the human beings on the floor making the plays to put the numbers in their favor.
Posted on 5/25/26 at 5:07 pm to PrimeTime Money
Agree, I’d also add that a large portion of the data set is based on eras that played so differently you could argue the data is corrupted or useless.
This post was edited on 5/25/26 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 5/25/26 at 5:33 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
Is Kenny Atkinson Boom?
I’m pretty sure he wasn’t employed by the Rockets when Harden was
But question… if we asked this question to Mike Brown and he was looking at the same numbers Atkinson was, and he said “well we should be down 2-1 in this series but we’re not”, how would NY fans react?
This post was edited on 5/25/26 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 5/25/26 at 5:44 pm to SPEEDY
Darryl Morey approves this message.
Posted on 5/25/26 at 6:44 pm to SPEEDY
In this case, analytics is being used, as it often is, as an excuse for the reason a decision or series of decisions are made. This is so the actual coach, who is supposed to have his finger on the pulse of his team and the game flow, has an out for making a decision based purely on data, and not the situational moment when things go south.
That quote that "Analytically we won 2 out of the 3 games" is clearly the most ridiculous thing I may have ever heard from a coach during a playoff series who's team is on the verge of being swept. He deserves to be fired for that embarrassing video.
That quote that "Analytically we won 2 out of the 3 games" is clearly the most ridiculous thing I may have ever heard from a coach during a playoff series who's team is on the verge of being swept. He deserves to be fired for that embarrassing video.
Posted on 5/25/26 at 6:54 pm to Da #1 Stunna
quote:
That quote that "Analytically we won 2 out of the 3 games" is clearly the most ridiculous thing I may have ever heard from a coach during a playoff series who's team is on the verge of being swept. He deserves to be fired for that embarrassing video.
During the regular season no one would bat an eye…
Posted on 5/25/26 at 7:46 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
difficult time explaining why based on the data.
Yes if we ignore the most important data point… the score
Posted on 5/25/26 at 7:47 pm to SPEEDY
Analytics definitely won’t save him tonight
Popular
Back to top


14








