- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge grants TTU QB Sorsby's injunction against the NCAA, eligible to play 10 gms in 2026
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:01 pm to Swagga
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:01 pm to Swagga
quote:
This is significantly more egregious than anything Kiffin, Golding, or anyone else has done. This needs to be the case that pushes the pendulum back the other direction. Embarrassing for Texas tech.
It’s not much different than the Chambliss ruling.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:03 pm to witty alias
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:05 pm to boosiebadazz
yeah I don't believe Dan on that one, sorry
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:07 pm to Underwood
The coach is obviously being sarcastic, I find it easily believable.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:09 pm to The Pirate King
Sorsby is such a piece of shite
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:18 pm to witty alias
quote:
It’s not much different than the Chambliss ruling.
It’s different in ways that count. Chambliss had to do with a difference in interpretation. And the judge said the NCAA couldn’t go after Ole Miss until after he’s had his day in court.
Sorsby admitted to breaking a clearly stated rule. The judge said the NCAA can’t prevent Sorsby from playing which is kind of true. It’s up to the member school to follow the NCAA’s ruling or face consequences.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:31 pm to WestSideTiger
Until the universities decide to give the NCAA(or a collective governing body/commissioner) some balls nothing will change. And as long as the University presidents are stacking fat rolls of cash nobody gives a shite.
Everyone can see its a joke yet nobody is moving.
Everyone can see its a joke yet nobody is moving.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:34 pm to witty alias
quote:
It’s not much different than the Chambliss ruling.
Yes it is. They went the same route to circumvent the rules, but the rules are vastly different in terms of severity/impact to the game.
One kid got an extra year of eligibility he shouldn't have, the other gambled on his own team in a game.
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:04 pm to The Pirate King
Hang our damn 2013 title banner back up
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:18 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Conferences could fix it
How? Its not even that I disagree but if conferences come up with rules and those rules arent followed and then theres a lawsuit that sides with a player how's it any different than the NCAA rn?
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:21 pm to jiffyjohnson
I don’t have time to read through 11 pages, but why only 10 games?
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:21 pm to CR4090
quote:
Also Sorsby is a POS. If he had any integrity he would accept his punishment and move on.
this may very well be true (probably is), but he has 5 million reasons not to accept his punishment and move on
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:31 pm to gsvar2004
The 2 game suspension is what TT and Sorsby came up with voluntarily
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:34 pm to gsvar2004
quote:
I don’t have time to read through 11 pages, but why only 10 games?
From what I am reading, the judge ruled he must sit out 2 games.
He is also eligible to play in the playoffs if they make it.
ETA: Ok turns out, Sorsby and his legal team floated that idea initially (2 game suspension), which was rejected. Once they appealed and the injunction was granted, the judge made it part of the deal that he must sit out the first 2 games of the 2026 season.
This post was edited on 6/8/26 at 4:37 pm
Back to top

3








