Started By
Message

re: Is lonzo ball a less explosive Michael Carter Williams?

Posted on 11/20/17 at 4:32 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112441 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

But bro, he's always shooting poorly.
I posted this the other day. Westbrook's 1st season, in which I think he was 1 year older than Lonzo, he was 33% from the field in his first however many games. At that time, in the same amount of games, Ball was at 31%.

Not that big of a difference, and it doesn't signify something he can't ever recover from.

I'm not saying it's nothing to worry about at this very moment, it's a concern. But it doesn't mean he can't ever be a viable NBA shooter. I will say, he'll have to improve before season's end, or then it will absolutely be very worrisome and questions about whether he'll ever shoot well enough will be legit IMO.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
86695 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 4:35 pm to
Is this the same thing as, "Peyton threw more INTs than (insert shite QB) in his rookie year?"
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285226 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Not that big of a difference, and it doesn't signify something he can't ever recover from.




but then you look at Jason kidd and realize he was a poor shooter his rookie year, and that lasted throughout his career.


Westbrook has elite athleticism.

Westbrook>Kidd>Ball on the athleticism front
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 4:54 pm to
ZO's 8th in the Association in assists, pretty good defender as well, all know Jason Kidd sucked dick from a shooting standpoint his first 17 games, turned out OK as a surefire HOFer #Facts
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Not any. But I don't think Lakers fans and top brass want the Lakers to be just any team. This kid is supposed to turn this organization into a champion. Now clearly that's a tall task for anyone, so I wouldn't judge him on that.


Yeah I don't recall that being the expectation of the relevant basketball brass for the immediate future relative to the Lakers since they're basically a fledgling team with all those young guys gaining valuable exposure and experience, plus they'll have space and assets to flip for some high-profile FAs next summer. It's evident ZO's made a positive impact on the Lakers due to his work ethic, pass-first mentality and solid defensive play and the Lakers have been competitive in basically all their games thus far. Overachieving according to me, could be an encouraging season proceeding forward.
Posted by jackwoods4
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 5:08 pm to
Lonzo doesn't even have to turn this team into a champion. Him, Ingram and Kuzma just have to develop well and show they're good. If those three guys develop well over the next couple seasons, the Lakers will be a viable destination for players in free agency and trades.

You've got three guys who all look like they could form part of a big three in the coming years. You add a guy like Boogie (if the Pels experiment fails), PG (if he actually wants to go to LA) or Klay (decides he wants to be more of a focal point), the Lakers are suddenly a really solid team.

They just need those three young guys to continue to do what they're doing and to add one player to be a 4-5 seed in a few seasons.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
86695 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 5:12 pm to
I agree with you that his style is better for this young team as it's going to help THEM grow faster. Almost like a washed up pass first vet PG might do for a young team. I don't mean that as negatively as it sounded.

I just look around the league and Lonzo's pass first mentality doesn't get my juices flowing at all. You know what is pass first? The offensive schemes of most of the really good teams.

Know what else is pretty damn pass happy? Many of the stars around the league who also frick you up by putting the ball through the net.

That's what the league does now. One reason I'm down on Lonzo is I don't think his final form is what you want in 2017 and beyond when looking for a guy to take you to a championship.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285226 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 5:12 pm to
well yea Kidd was really good, albeit overrated. He was never a cornerstone player.
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

well yea Kidd was really good, albeit overrated. He was never a cornerstone player.


Phoenix Suns and New Jersey Nets would beg to differ, the whole narrative with Dallas his first stint there as the "Three Js" was simply weird with how everything deteriorated, though to give him credit his rookie season they achieved the largest record improvement in the league considering how atrocious that team was prior EVEN WITH Jim Jackson and Jamal Mashburn.
This post was edited on 11/20/17 at 5:32 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285226 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

LOL you must've forgotten how atrocious the Dallas Mavericks were before they drafted Kidd with that lottery pick, EVEN WITH Jim Jackson and Jamal Mashburn.




Kidd never won shite with that team. won 36 & 26 games, then got traded in the middle of season 3
Posted by Skyler97
Member since Mar 2014
4482 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 5:24 pm to
Lonzo with the 15th worst PER for a PG in the NBA. Between powerhouse players mario chalmers and tim frazier
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112441 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

but then you look at Jason kidd and realize he was a poor shooter his rookie year, and that lasted throughout his career.

Point for Lonzo.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285226 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:06 pm to
quote:


Phoenix Suns and New Jersey Nets would beg to differ, t



first of all, nice edit after i brought to your attention that you were wrong

secondly, ln no way am i bashing Kidd as a player. But that is what he was. Poor shooter, average athletically. That relegated him to always being the Robin instead of Batman. Westbrook, he's a Batman player who can carry a team. Kidd's best attribute was making his teammates better, which is why the good teams he played on, he was surrounded by good players.

and lets just put it out there, the Kidd-led Nets won the weakest stretch of eastern conference basketball of my lifetime.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
86695 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

Point for Lonzo.
At his peak, Kidd was a 41-44% shooter from the field. Lonzo can barely beat that from the free throw line.
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

first of all, nice edit after i brought to your attention that you were wrong


I jumped the gun on that one though the Mavs' record his rookie season was the largest record turnaround in the Association that season, things shouldn't have transpired as they did to produce that trade but it was what it was.

quote:

That relegated him to always being the Robin instead of Batman.


Couldn't disagree more with that statement but that's your opinion

quote:

the Kidd-led Nets won the weakest stretch of eastern conference basketball of my lifetime.


Yeah, I'm not gonna use that to diminish what Kidd accomplished with a team like the Nets bc people like trashing the East I guess since MJ retired the 2nd time and Shaq left Orlando and quite frankly I'm sick of that bulljive, what happened happened.

Posted by sugar71
NOLA
Member since Jun 2012
9967 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Kidd never won shite with that team. won 36 & 26 games, then got traded in the middle of season 3



Tough crowd here huh? That was a 13 win Mavericks team that improved to 36 wins & a few games out of the playoffs. Kidd wasn't traded because he was ineffective ,but because he didn't get along well with the other 2 young players ( Jackson & Mashburn) nor his Coach.


You also left off how Dallas slipped back to pre- Kidd historic bad when they swapped him for Michael Finley Dropped to 24 , 20 & 19 win seasons without Kidd.
You know who improved immediately? Phoenix Suns with Kidd.




Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112441 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

At his peak, Kidd was a 41-44% shooter from the field. Lonzo can barely beat that from the free throw line.

Lonzo Ball is shooting 31.3% from the field. Jason Kidd shot 32.3%(and 13.2% from 3 LOL) during his 1st 17 games when he was I believe 2 years older than Lonzo.

Too bad we didn't have message boards in 1994 so I could bump your JKidd is a bum post 25 years later when he makes the HOF!!!
This post was edited on 11/20/17 at 6:29 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285226 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

Tough crowd here huh? That was a 13 win Mavericks team that improved to 36 wins & a few games out of the playoffs.



poster edited his post which then didn't match my response fwiw


Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
86695 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:32 pm to
Was Kidd labeled a special talent and transcendent talent who would IMMEDIATELY become the face of the Lakers and basically be their savior?

Because he fell way below that in his career.

That type of hype needs to be met with rings as the best player on a team. Did Kidd ever do that? If not, I'd laugh at your bump.
Posted by theducks
Where The Blazers Play
Member since Aug 2013
14116 posts
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:34 pm to
If you want a good laugh at PTE’s takes here’s one where he’s downplaying Antonio Brown’s ability to play WR because he’s small

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram