Started By
Message

re: Is Erik Spoelstra a top 5 coach?

Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:24 pm to
Posted by Gatorbait2008
Member since Aug 2015
22953 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:24 pm to
Id put Pop as clear number one. No a and b there. His resume is just absurd.
Posted by hiltacular
NYC
Member since Jan 2011
19691 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:34 pm to
Brad Stevens Top 5 Coach??? Only on Tigerdroppings

You guys continue to impress, dude has won literally nothing in a shite conference.

Spo is a god compared to him.
This post was edited on 5/13/16 at 11:35 pm
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160105 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:37 pm to
Such an Atlanta sports fan thing to say
Posted by cornhat
Member since Feb 2011
3393 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

Kerr is in the discussion, BUT why does he have to be #1?

I want to know the answer to this too.

Why is Kerr so highly thought of? And why is Luke Walton considered to be a good coach with such a brief career?
Posted by hiltacular
NYC
Member since Jan 2011
19691 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:39 pm to
what a life you live sir
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36490 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:40 pm to
I agree. Stevens is good and we will certainly see, but top 5 already? FOH

vogel over bud? Meh

Bud will get penalized for not doing enough somehow while the same people will simultaneously say that the Hawks never have a chance at winning shite with their roster. Classic.
This post was edited on 5/13/16 at 11:42 pm
Posted by theducks
Where The Blazers Play
Member since Aug 2013
13746 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:41 pm to
I'm not discussing GOAT, I think we're going to see a lot Kerr over the next decade or two.
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:42 pm to
quote:

vogel over bud? Meh



Do elaborate please
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:43 pm to
quote:


Why is Kerr so highly thought of?


Seriously?

quote:

And why is Luke Walton considered to be a good coach with such a brief career?


I don't think I have even seen anyone mention him
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160105 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:44 pm to
So y'all are mad that people think Stevens is great because he hasn't won anything and mad because people say that Bud isn't great because he hasn't won anything?
Posted by hiltacular
NYC
Member since Jan 2011
19691 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:45 pm to
I didn't say shite about Bud numbnuts. I think it is asinine to say Stevens is a better coach than Spo which is the topic at hand. You are the one that threw in some retarded ATL sports fan reference.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59709 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 11:57 pm to
If you coach for 2 years and win two titles by default you should be #1. You can play the what if game referring to talent but at the end of the day you gotta go off of results. Does he get credit for curry going from an all star to back to back MVP? What about greens progress? It's not all coaching a lot is natural development but you've got to give him credit for installing a system that maximizes the talent of his roster.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35243 posts
Posted on 5/14/16 at 12:20 am to
quote:

I think it is asinine to say Stevens is a better coach than Spo which is the topic at hand.
Most people are putting both Spo and Stevens in the top 5 since the "topic at hand" is top 5.

Regardless, Stevens is widely considered a great coach, between his time at Butler AND the improvements he's made at Boston. Mocking people who put him in the top 5 is a pretty ignorant reaction to a reasonable evaluation.
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 5/14/16 at 12:40 am to
quote:

Plus, he's been successful far longer than those 3. It's silly to put them ahead of Spoelstra.

Spoelstra isn't without his faults, but he's been successful for a long time. And that shouldn't be overlooked.


I try and look at it comparatively. If I give Spoelstra the current Blazers or Celtics squad, I don't see how he would do as well as either of them have. Thats sort of the dividing line for me.

He is a good coach, I don't think he is top 5 though.
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 5/14/16 at 12:43 am to
quote:

If you coach for 2 years and win two titles by default you should be #1. You can play the what if game referring to talent but at the end of the day you gotta go off of results. Does he get credit for curry going from an all star to back to back MVP? What about greens progress? It's not all coaching a lot is natural development but you've got to give him credit for installing a system that maximizes the talent of his roster.


Results do matter but other context is important. If we value results too much we come away arguing David Blatt is a top 5 coach for reaching the finals his first season and taking a 33 win team to 53 wins. Better then any guys who haven't made the finals.
This post was edited on 5/14/16 at 12:51 am
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 5/14/16 at 12:48 am to
quote:

If I give Spoelstra the current Blazers or Celtics squad, I don't see how he would do as well as either of them have.


Both squads are better than what he trotted out there tonight. He's only missed the playoffs once as Miami's coach, which was last season where they lost Bosh and Wade for majority of the season.

I mean look at the team he took to the postseason in his first season: LINK
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 5/14/16 at 12:48 am to
quote:

By this logic David Blatt is one of the greatest coaches of all time for getting to the Finals his first year.

By this logic Blatt is a superior coach to Thibs, Stevens, Bud and Stotts. Which is ridiculous.


So we throw out what Phil did because of massive talent advantage?
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35243 posts
Posted on 5/14/16 at 12:59 am to
quote:

Thats sort of the dividing line for me.
But it's a dividing line based on pure speculation without any objective facts to back it up. Say you want about the talent of Miami with the big three, but Spo's adjustment of the offense was a big reason they were so successful AND was ahead of the trend that teams like the Warriors and Cavs have emulated.
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 5/14/16 at 1:03 am to
quote:


Both squads are better than what he trotted out there tonight. He's only missed the playoffs once as Miami's coach, which was last season where they lost Bosh and Wade for majority of the season.

I mean look at the team he took to the postseason in his first season: LINK


Bullshite. The Celtics squad is not better then what Miami has had under Spoelstra, practically ever.

And it is hard to miss the playoffs as any coach when your entire career has had a top 5 player at their peak until Lebron left in a subpar conference.
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 5/14/16 at 1:07 am to
quote:

The Celtics squad is not better then what Miami has had under Spoelstra, practically ever.



quote:

@MarcJSpearsESPN
Heat in a deciding game to make it to the Eastern Conference Finals with 2 rookies, an undrafted 2nd year player, no Whiteside, Bosh. Salute


first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram