
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Indiana football
Posted on 9/23/26 at 11:59 am
Posted on 9/23/26 at 11:59 am
Two of their guys were granted an injunction for a 5th year. Will it get the same negative press Kiffin and LSU received? I bet you it won't
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:03 pm to Crusaders6767
Did either player sign with an NFL team?
the answer is no. Both had major injuries last year and never signed with an NFL team. Huge difference that what LSU tried to do .
the answer is no. Both had major injuries last year and never signed with an NFL team. Huge difference that what LSU tried to do .
This post was edited on 9/23/26 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:12 pm to Crusaders6767
I bet you would have beat Ole Miss if you had been able to play those guys.


This post was edited on 9/23/26 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:17 pm to everytrueson
they continue to defy the NCAA
Indiana should forfeit any games they play in
Indiana should forfeit any games they play in
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:18 pm to Crusaders6767
Big10 commissioner is pro Big10. Sankey isn’t pro SEC. Big difference
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:30 pm to 03 West CoChamps
The two at LSU didn't either. Nor played a down in preseason
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:31 pm to everytrueson
quote:I think Wright would have made a contribution after green went out tbh
I bet you would have beat Ole Miss if you had been able to play those guys.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:33 pm to Crusaders6767
quote:
The two at LSU didn't either. Nor played a down in preseason
Yes they did. Wright got a decent signing bonuses.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:40 pm to Crusaders6767
This is just cope for ole Miss beating yalls arse.
If only a backup TE would’ve been allowed to play! Btw Levitt is extremely Mid, Chambliss humiliated him.
If only a backup TE would’ve been allowed to play! Btw Levitt is extremely Mid, Chambliss humiliated him.
This post was edited on 9/23/26 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:41 pm to Crusaders6767
Geez, you guys know it's not the same. Why are you trying to justify Kiffin's slime.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:43 pm to td01241
quote:chambliss has humiliated everyone in his path including stockton
If only a backup TE would’ve been allowed to play! Btw Levitt is extremely Mid, Chambliss humiliated him.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:44 pm to The Egg
Meh
Stockton outplayed him once and Chambliss outplayed him once. They’re tied.
Stockton outplayed him once and Chambliss outplayed him once. They’re tied.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:58 pm to td01241
quote:
This is just cope for ole Miss beating yalls arse.
This has nothing to do with Ole Miss. Any logical person can see that LSU and Lane Kiffin got ripped in all media and the SEC threatened to kick them out if they followed a court ruling granting players eligibility.
Meanwhile all across the country players are breaking NCAA and conference rules because a “local judge” gave them a favorable ruling. If you want to include Ole Miss, let me know how Trinidad Chambliss is eligible.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 12:59 pm to Choupique19
I don’t think Chambliss should be eligible and if it were up to me he would’ve been forced to enter the draft last season.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:18 pm to td01241
quote:
I don’t think Chambliss should be eligible and if it were up to me he would’ve been forced to enter the draft last season.
And yet I haven't heard any screams from the media that Pete Golding is ruining college football and no one is leaking "inside info" to Ross Dellenger to say that SEC school presidents are ready to vote Ole Miss out.
It's all a crock to drum up clicks on tweets and views on tv debate shows.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:20 pm to everytrueson
quote:I'm not the biggest LSU fan, more of a by proxy that cheers for them and uses it as a tool in networking. That said, if players with TRO's weren't allowed to play, then LSU wins that game walking away. The difference in that game was the 6th yr QB who was told he was ineligible earlier this year.
I bet you would have beat Ole Miss if you had been able to play those guys.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:22 pm to Choupique19
Not even the same thing
They signed with NFL teams and asked to be released to come back.
The other players never signed
They signed with NFL teams and asked to be released to come back.
The other players never signed
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:29 pm to SeeeeK
quote:It feels like it should be an easy black & white. Did the NCAA rule the player ineligible for something that has had players ruled ineligible for as long as we can remember? Did they have to go to specific judges that are boosters or alumni of their program to get an injunction saying the NCAA enforcing their rules isn't fair?
Not even the same thing
When you look at those, then these are all the same.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:34 pm to Crusaders6767
One of the guys signed with Philly and had a 5 figure signing bonus. The other 1 signed a contract after rookie camp to be part of the 90 man training camp roster.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 1:51 pm to SeeeeK
quote:
Not even the same thing
They signed with NFL teams and asked to be released to come back.
The other players never signed
So because players weren't good enough to make it to August camp with the NFL they should be allowed to play with no pushback, while players with the same amount of college years that made it to training camp, but didn't make the NFL regular season rosters they should not be allowed to play because LSU are the outlaws of college athletics?
All of the players on both sides in the above scenario have a court ruling allowing them to play.

Popular
Back to top

5











