- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How bad would an NBA team from 1994 crush a team from 1964?
Posted on 8/10/24 at 9:25 am
Posted on 8/10/24 at 9:25 am
I would say at least by 40 right? It would be a bloodbath. Would be cool to see the difference
MJ, Charles, Shaq would absolutely roll. Me and my dad were talking about it because we were both 7 years old respectfully at those years and just getting on to really watch sports
MJ, Charles, Shaq would absolutely roll. Me and my dad were talking about it because we were both 7 years old respectfully at those years and just getting on to really watch sports
This post was edited on 8/10/24 at 9:38 am
19
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:13 am to lsupride87
They wouldnt
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:23 am to SportsGuyNOLA
You really think the team from 64 could hang with them?
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:31 am to lsupride87
Depends on the rules. If they played by 1964 rules, the 1994 team would be severely hamstrung (walking, traveling, carrying, etc.).
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:34 am to lsupride87
Wilt would still go for 45/20
This post was edited on 8/10/24 at 10:35 am
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:41 am to lsupride87
Messrs. Russell and Chamberlain might have something to say about that …
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:45 am to TX Tiger
Yeah, modern rules would be tough, 1964 rules would be interesting.
You have to look at such things in context. Aaron Judge would be still be great but take him back to 1905 and he’d struggle to hit 15 home runs playing in fields with 500-foot outfield fences and hitting a misshapen, tobacco-stained mush ball that’s been used for nine innings.
You have to look at such things in context. Aaron Judge would be still be great but take him back to 1905 and he’d struggle to hit 15 home runs playing in fields with 500-foot outfield fences and hitting a misshapen, tobacco-stained mush ball that’s been used for nine innings.
Posted on 8/10/24 at 10:53 am to InkStainedWretch
West, Oscar, Elgin.
Posted on 8/10/24 at 11:11 am to FightinTigersDammit
The truly great ones could do it in any era.
Posted on 8/10/24 at 11:15 am to FightinTigersDammit
And starters back on those days rarely came out of games. Wilt averaged 48.5 minutes a game in the 61-62 season.
If you play a 10 game set with a game every other night on 1964 rules and standards then the 64 team wins at least 7 bare minimum. Probably 8 or 9 and 3-4 of those wins are by double digits or more.
If you do it under 2024, it’s closer but will all depend on how many practices the 64 guys get and can get accustomed to the 3 and the softy rules of today. I’d say split series there.
ETA: I see this emotional nutsack of an OP changed it from 2024 to 1994. You aren’t slick.
If you play a 10 game set with a game every other night on 1964 rules and standards then the 64 team wins at least 7 bare minimum. Probably 8 or 9 and 3-4 of those wins are by double digits or more.
If you do it under 2024, it’s closer but will all depend on how many practices the 64 guys get and can get accustomed to the 3 and the softy rules of today. I’d say split series there.
ETA: I see this emotional nutsack of an OP changed it from 2024 to 1994. You aren’t slick.
This post was edited on 8/10/24 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 8/10/24 at 11:34 am to Dairy Sanders
Wilt v a team with young Shaq and prime David Robinson and Patrick Ewing.
He’s not going 45/20.
He’s not going 45/20.
Posted on 8/10/24 at 11:38 am to extremetigerfanatic
What about this
Forgot all star teams
The 1994 pacers that went 47-35 vs the 1964 Hawks that went 45-35
Pacers by 30 plus
Forgot all star teams
The 1994 pacers that went 47-35 vs the 1964 Hawks that went 45-35
Pacers by 30 plus
This post was edited on 8/10/24 at 11:39 am
Posted on 8/10/24 at 11:45 am to lsupride87
Wilt would eat Shaq alive. Forward is where the real weakness would be for 64.
Of course there is MJ.
Of course there is MJ.
Posted on 8/10/24 at 11:45 am to prplhze2000
quote:Goodness
Wilt would eat Shaq alive.
Posted on 8/10/24 at 11:54 am to prplhze2000
I hope you are not serious…. I think you meant to say that Shaq would eat Wilt alive.
Posted on 8/10/24 at 11:55 am to lsupride87
I'd say there were definitely guys in 64 that could play today and still be stars.
Oscar Robertson, Wilt, Elgin Baylor, Jerry West are examples of players that especially with today's advances in training and all that comes with that would I think would all be very good players today. It's the depth and supporting players where 94 players would have the advantage.
Oscar Robertson, Wilt, Elgin Baylor, Jerry West are examples of players that especially with today's advances in training and all that comes with that would I think would all be very good players today. It's the depth and supporting players where 94 players would have the advantage.
This post was edited on 8/10/24 at 11:56 am
Posted on 8/10/24 at 12:26 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Pacers by 30 plus
50 plus
Posted on 8/10/24 at 12:35 pm to InkStainedWretch
quote:he’d also be facing arms that couldn’t play 5A baseball today
he’d struggle to hit 15 home runs playing in fields with 500-foot outfield fences and hitting a misshapen, tobacco-stained mush ball that’s been used for nine innings.
Posted on 8/10/24 at 12:38 pm to lsupride87
No one sees what you're doing here. I see you.
Posted on 8/10/24 at 12:40 pm to lsupride87
So a NBA team from 2054 would crush a team from today?
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News