Started By
Message

re: Goodell defends Redskins name

Posted on 6/13/13 at 5:20 am to
Posted by Dalosaqy
I can't quite re
Member since Dec 2007
12300 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 5:20 am to
quote:

what about the Cleveland Indians? that has to be racist right?
Wrong. Indian describes a Native American. Redskin is a disparaging and offensive slur.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 5:28 am to
quote:

The NCAA made ULM drop Indians as their mascot


That was a mistake by the NCAA.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 5:32 am to
It's racist because people used to get paid by the government to kill and bring in their scalps.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45218 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 5:34 am to
quote:

Other Native Americans are offended by it, and that to me is good enough reason to change it. It's not right to tell them to "Suck it Up" or "Stop being so Sensitive" when it is clearly understandable why they are offended by it.



Exactly.

And we've been hearing about it more often in recent years because people are feeling more empowered to talk about it than they were back in the good old days, when newspapers would write racist slurs in articles and headlines to describe minorities and when domestic violence was nothing more than a punch line in a popular tv show (pun intended).

This post was edited on 6/13/13 at 5:37 am
Posted by LSUCanFAN
In the past
Member since Jan 2009
28071 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 5:57 am to
I HATE ROGER, him defending the name makes me want them to change it to Capitals :doublebird:
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
26964 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 7:48 am to
They could change the name to Braves, Indians, Warriors and not be racist. Or change it to Savages and be racist. The "Damn Injuns"?
Posted by bigasstiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2006
1125 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 7:50 am to
quote:

Wrong. Indian describes a Native American. Redskin is a disparaging and offensive slur

Call them the Whiteskins. I don't care. F@ck all you PC homos.
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:35 am to
quote:

Wrong. Indian describes a Native American.
so it'd be ok to have a team called the Minnesota Caucasians or the New Orleans African Americans? me thinks people would get upset
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
33384 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:41 am to
As a registered native american I love it.


frick congress.
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:43 am to
quote:

As a registered native american
stop lying you dirty Mexican
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
33384 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:44 am to
The seminole tribe coming out and voicing support for the name didnt hurt.
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
33384 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:44 am to
Si :(
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
33384 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Other Native Americans are offended by it, and that to me is good enough reason to change it. It's not right to tell them to "Suck it Up" or "Stop being so Sensitive" when it is clearly understandable why they are offended by it. 
so lau should drop the live mike the tiger because a few animal rights folks are offended by him?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125395 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:55 am to
redskins stackkeeddddd

pc pussiess frickedddddddddddddddddd
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61441 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:56 am to
quote:

it's like people actively search out a reason to be offended. Political correctness IOOC


I don't think this is PC out of control though. Attacking names like Braves and Seminoles is PC out of control, but this is an ethnic slur and the only reason people like it as the name is it's very well established. There's no way Redskins would be adopted as the name today if this were a new franchise, but names like Braves and Seminoles would still be popular among fans.
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:57 am to
Didn't care either way before.

Goodell coming out in defense of it has changed my mind.

CHANGE THE NAME
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 8:58 am to
This entire PC campaign of complaining about the 'Redskins' name shows how much of a country of pussies we have become.
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19265 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 9:05 am to
The Redskins are not located in D.C. so that city has no power to make Synder do anything, let alone move the team. And he has consistently been clear: he will NEVER change the name. I am a dyed in the wool Irishman, and my family, going back to those fresh off the boats in N.Y., had a hell of a lot more to worry about & struggle over than being called a Mick and/or mocked by all the typical sterotypes of Irishmen. Point being, American Natives have a lot more to worry about than a name of a pro football team in my very Irish opinion.
Posted by The7Sins
Truth or Consequences, New Mexico
Member since Nov 2012
1178 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:39 am to
Then the NCAA are idiots. I am not from Louisiana so I do not keep up with ULM obviously.
Posted by The7Sins
Truth or Consequences, New Mexico
Member since Nov 2012
1178 posts
Posted on 6/13/13 at 10:41 am to
I agree the logo should be changed for Cleveland. But the name should stay as Indians is not a racist term.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram