
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Good luck to the players in their labor fight. Vladimir Guerrero Jr helps set the table.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:16 am
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:16 am
Classy Vladdy Jr with his 14 year, $500MM contract has this to say about his poor performance this year.
"I want people to understand one thing. The money they gave me wasn't for what I'm going to do. It was for what I already did," Guerrero told Batista. "They didn't pay me because I'm going to hit 40 [home runs] every year. They paid me for what I already accomplished. People are confused about that, but I think the same way they do. “
"I want people to understand one thing. The money they gave me wasn't for what I'm going to do. It was for what I already did," Guerrero told Batista. "They didn't pay me because I'm going to hit 40 [home runs] every year. They paid me for what I already accomplished. People are confused about that, but I think the same way they do. “
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 10:17 am
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:18 am to DiamondDog
Grew up rich and has 0 concept of how the world works
And not as good as his dad
And not as good as his dad
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:20 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
I really don’t mind the big contracts, but you got to hear this as an owner…and think twice about ever doing that again.
But maybe not. MLB seems to live in fantasy land with Monopoly money.
But maybe not. MLB seems to live in fantasy land with Monopoly money.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:22 am to DiamondDog
Is he lying, though?
I understand that it’s not something you say out loud, but contracts are generally given to veterans based on past performance.
I understand that it’s not something you say out loud, but contracts are generally given to veterans based on past performance.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:25 am to High C
He’s only 27 though, he is just entering his prime
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:26 am to High C
quote:
I understand that it’s not something you say out loud, but contracts are generally given to veterans based on past performance.
Uh, you think the Dodgers gave Shohei $700mm because of what he did in the past for the Angels, with no expectation of him continuing that?
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 10:27 am
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:27 am to High C
He had what…two elite seasons. Unless since they’re Canadian seasons they’re worth less. Who knows. I leave it up to you good people to decide.
But this guy is cooked. He will be dead payroll if this is his attitude. He has no further motivation apparently. Good luck Toronto.
But this guy is cooked. He will be dead payroll if this is his attitude. He has no further motivation apparently. Good luck Toronto.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:32 am to High C
quote:
Is he lying, though?
I understand that it’s not something you say out loud, but contracts are generally given to veterans based on past performance.
GMs of every sport completely disagree with that
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:35 am to DiamondDog
quote:
But this guy is cooked. He will be dead payroll if this is his attitude. He has no further motivation apparently. Good luck Toronto.
I don’t disagree with this, and I think it’s happening with more players than just Vlad. I think that in 2026 there are a lot of players who simply don’t enjoy playing baseball. That shouldn’t affect their effort or motivation because they are supposed to be professionals, but come on.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:36 am to High C
quote:
Is he lying, though?
If he were 34, he would probably be right.
But he is 27. His argument is not valid.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:38 am to High C
Bro I would try to sneak away from this thread if I were you. You have an all-time bad take in it already.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:41 am to High C
He’s half right. It is based on what you did before. But you f**king A better believe there’s an expectation that you are going to maintain that level.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:42 am to InkStainedWretch
would not be shocked if they miss a season
if both sides dig their heels in, it's gonna get ugly
if both sides dig their heels in, it's gonna get ugly
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:43 am to DiamondDog
Saw the other day Vladdy is rocking a sub .700 OPS


Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:44 am to DBG
Well he’s only hit 9 homers this year (only 1 came at home) so his words are speaking pretty loudly. He's been abysmal for someone thats gettting paid a contract like that.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:44 am to High C
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 10:46 am
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:47 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
Bro I would try to sneak away from this thread if I were you. You have an all-time bad take in it already.
I get it. My statement was too generalized without taking his age into consideration enough. I’ll take the L on that part.
I do stand behind the idea that many players have received big contracts and become “satisfied”. Vlad isn’t the first, but he shouldn’t have said it out loud.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:18 am to High C
quote:
I understand that it’s not something you say out loud, but contracts are generally given to veterans based on past performance.
This is 100% wrong.
Obviously, past performance is probably the best predictor of future performance. But, beyond that, there's no truth to that statement.
Frankly, it's dumb.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:27 am to moneyg
This is straight from google. Like I already said, my mistake was making it too general without accounting for Vlad’s age. Sure, teams expect high levels of performance to continue, but…
quote:
Why Performance Drops After Big Deals
Aging Curves:
Teams typically pay for past performance during peak years, meaning a natural physical decline coincides with the start of the new deal.

Popular
Back to top

4










