Started By
Message

re: Fox Rules Analyst says officials are told to use the TV footage if any discrepancies

Posted on 9/7/26 at 11:54 am to
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
14154 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 11:54 am to
Need to have a fan or set of fans from WMH sur to force discovery and see if any money changed hands to make this go away.

In all honesty, Michigan sucks and if they make the playoffs as 10-2 team when they should be 9-3 with a loss to a MAC save for the conspiracy, then the CFP talking about integrity is hilarious.

Posted by WonPercent
BATON ROUGE
Member since Aug 2023
1434 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 11:54 am to

[ Do you really how much money WVU makes to go to these P5 schools just to take it up the keister? ]

Woah, woah, woah. Careful with your team names. WVU might be shite, but we're not a rent a win. Yet.
This post was edited on 9/7/26 at 12:00 pm
Posted by Dadren
Jawja
Member since Dec 2023
3556 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

WMU and the MAC accepted the explanation

WMU has to move on. They have 11 games to play and as a football program, they can’t afford to stay stuck on a game in the past.

But the aggrieved party here isn’t just WMU, it’s the integrity of the game itself.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
62217 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Now, time is kept on the field by a neutral official appointed by the Big Ten.


Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
21871 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Now, time is kept on the field by a neutral official appointed by the Big Ten.


And yet they put out that release with the mysterious clock no one can see and didn’t mention a neutral official or time on the field
Posted by DirtyE
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2008
2612 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

Purely hypothetical, but does ANYONE here believe that if the player had batted the ball back into the field of play and a Michigan receiver caught it, the officials and replay booth would have come to the same conclusion? They would have called it a Michigan TD and ran off the field.


No they wouldn’t have; however bad you think this call was, if that had happened instead it would be 10 times worse and completely indefensible.
Posted by morganwadefan
TN
Member since May 2023
1824 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 6:34 pm to
The NFL does this. If in doubt, go with the click that millions of people are seeing.
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
34956 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 7:13 pm to
Michigan is 0-1
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
43511 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 7:16 pm to
Wasn’t that analyst an NFL ref? Are the rules the same?

I’m just so happy we’ve allowed these lengthy instant replays improve our game so much. I just love these increased stoppages and clear as mud decisions made.
Posted by Demonbengal
Ruston
Member since May 2015
6250 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:33 pm to
It’s simple really. If the MAC starts getting way more matchups with the BIG10 for more money per game than it will be obvious what happened.
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
8813 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 9:07 pm to
Who called the replay? Everyone was either walking off or celebrating. Why not just jog off the field and go drink?
Refs are crooked as politicians
Posted by 62zip
One Particular Harbor
Member since Aug 2005
7016 posts
Posted on 9/7/26 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

Purely hypothetical, but does ANYONE here believe that if the player had batted the ball back into the field of play and a Michigan receiver caught it, the officials and replay booth would have come to the same conclusion? They would have called it a Michigan TD and ran off the field.



They would have concluded it was an incomplete pass.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram