Does L.A. ever end up regretting giving up Jared Goff ?

We were talking about this today and a buddy of mine made a good point.

I had taken the position that absolutely not, L.A. got a S.B. out of it and that was why they did, so mission accomplished.

However, if the Lions go win it this year, and win 1 or 2 more, which obviously is a huge ask, but is there any point in which L.A. says to themselves that they fricked up and should have stayed with their guy ?

I know Goff has grown and developed more than when he was in LA, but I think he has shown that he might have been as equally effective as Stafford was during their SB year and was still on his first deal.

After this season, the future of the Rams is definitely in question, mainly because of the number of win now moves they made leading up to their run.

They could have had the same or better success, and sustained it for a lot longer had they stuck with Goff.

I know it's all speculation, but it was a good conversation at the bar, and I thought I'd get the MSB's opinion.