0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you really believe the SEC would kick LSU out? MSB edition
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The standard would already exist. Until another school formed the relationship with the players, they wouldn't be under the same scrutiny. I think at this point they couldn't enroll anywhere else, so the only threat is LSU.
Then the sec needs to apply the same punishment or threat to other schools rostering players with TROs where the ncaa ruled them ineligible.
Like the mini camp rejects and players that get a medical redshirt for tonsillitis when the previous school didn’t even support that assumption
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I don’t believe that’s what will happen either, but that’s irrelevant to my question.
Nobody who is seriously discussing this thinks LSU is actually at a risk of expulsion right now.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:15 pm to Scruffy
quote:Do you think they should?
I legitimately think they will be expelled.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:16 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Pretty sure the current one was against the NCAA and, after the SEC commented on the ruling, a judge added them to the lawsuit, correct?
It was the players
quote:
The drama started early Thursday. Late in the week, attorneys for the 51 plaintiff athletes added the SEC as a co-defendant with the NCAA. The SEC had come out with an updated dictate on previously existing rules regarding athletes who leave college to go to the pros. It stated that, as those athletes are not eligible to play because they went to the NFL, NBA, etc., any school that took them back and allowed them to play would face a litany of punishments. Among the list of punishments was a suspension for half the season for the head coach and significant financial fines for the school.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:17 pm to Scruffy
quote:
I legitimately think they will be expelled.
Not for this.
If we keep it up, I think it's on the table for the future, though.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:17 pm to DBG
quote:
Ethan Johnson is one of the 33 players on the TRO, signed by south carolina, announced by South Carolina on august 22
Also listed on South Carolinas roster
Also, Mark Mitchell basically did the same thing.
quote:
s "Attorneys amended their complaint in the Kentucky eligibility lawsuit against the NCAA, requesting a judge hold the NCAA in contempt of court for allowing the SEC to issue a new policy that impacts the eligibility of 13 athletes..."
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:18 pm to icecreamsnowball
quote:Based off of some emotional concept of “amateur sports”? No.
Do you think they should?
But I don’t really care anymore.
College sports died for me when the transfers and NIL aspects went out of control.
I have very little emotional tie to LSU at this point.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:19 pm to DBG
quote:
Also, Mark Mitchell basically did the same thing.
Ehtan Johnson works. Mitchell doesn't.
And if the SEC is granted its enforcement authority back, I'm sure USCE will be punished.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
But Sankey doesn’t have personal beef with Shane Beamer, so “SEC is voting to kick South Carolina out” isn’t on every headline
That’s the crux of all this. That and the fact the players wanted to transfer to another sec school, and not return to their original.
That’s the crux of all this. That and the fact the players wanted to transfer to another sec school, and not return to their original.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 8:22 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:21 pm to DBG
quote:
personal beef
c'mon
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:hahaha
If we keep it up
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
They cited Kiffins halftime comment. A USA Today reporter mentioned the lawyers cold gumbo comment. They want an apology.
We both know this moved past the case at hand a long time ago.
We both know this moved past the case at hand a long time ago.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:23 pm to icecreamsnowball
quote:
hahaha
Trying to find every loophole and focus on the greyest of grey areas in the rules is going to catch up with us. If that's how we continue to operate, and we run to state court judges to thwart the SEC, what do you think they will do?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:What the hell are you even talking about?
Trying to find every loophole and focus on the greyest of grey areas in the rules is going to catch up with us.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:26 pm to DBG
quote:
They cited Kiffins halftime comment. A USA Today reporter mentioned the lawyers cold gumbo comment. They want an apology.
We both know this moved past the case at hand a long time ago.
We turned this into a circus because we let ego and emotions run things. I'm not arguing any differently. South Carolina isn't doing any of this. You're arguing against yourself at this point.
And I said if the SEC gets its authority back, USCE will face punishment. If they are found to have coordinated Johnson joining the suit, it will be more severe.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:27 pm to icecreamsnowball
quote:
What the hell are you even talking about?
For example, recruiting 2 guys who had signed professional NFL contracts who clearly were not eligible by SEC or NCAA standards, and then claiming but-for the NCAA's non-retroactive rule, they would have never signed those contracts.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:what do you mean “claiming?”That’s exactly what happened. That’s kind of a huge deal. They were wrong for excluding that class of players. No one disagrees with this.
and then claiming but-for the NCAA's non-retroactive rule, they would have never signed those contracts.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:34 pm to icecreamsnowball
I think when somebody says something that you should believe them. The SEC has repeatedly said they are ready and willing to kick LSU out of the conference if they don't fall in line. Believe them and be done with this.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:36 pm to SoDakHawk
LSU just filled its roster so no “pro players”
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:37 pm to SoDakHawk
Page 17 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News