- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Denver Broncos have hired GB Packers OC Nathaniel Hackett as HC…
Posted on 1/27/22 at 8:33 am to tigerbait3488
Posted on 1/27/22 at 8:33 am to tigerbait3488
quote:
What a dogshit hire.
Not if Rodgers and Adams follow him.
Would be the best new hire in the NFL if that happens.
0
Posted on 1/27/22 at 10:05 am to TTsTowel
His first step should be getting GB's QB coach, Luke Getsy, as his OC.
Posted on 1/27/22 at 10:07 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
They are loaded at WR already
1) If you can get Adams, you make the room
2) Broncos would have to give up something besides picks, I would think, to land Rodgers
Posted on 1/27/22 at 10:10 am to lsutigers1992
quote:
Yep. Son of Paul Hackett
NFL: Nepotism Football League
This is why we need a Rooney Rule, but maybe it should be modified to a quota of applicants whose daddies weren't NFL coaches.
How about let a private business hire who in the hell they want? If it is a bad hire they are only hurting themselves. What do you do for a living? Do you want someone coming and telling you who you can and cannot hire? I certainly don't and won't allow it to happen. I will hire the best qualified that also fits in best with my company.
Posted on 1/27/22 at 10:34 am to TTsTowel
Does Denver have enough cap space for both Adams and Rodgers? I don't see any team being able to acquire both of them and make it work financially.
Posted on 1/27/22 at 10:36 am to Northshore Saint
quote:
Does Denver have enough cap space for both Adams and Rodgers?
yes, they are in very decent position regarding cap space.
Posted on 1/27/22 at 11:36 am to lsutigers1992
quote:
Yep. Son of Paul Hackett
Posted on 1/27/22 at 11:50 am to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Denver loves getting the last years out of a QB, but I guess it worked last time.
It’s the only time I remember them doing that
Posted on 1/27/22 at 12:16 pm to TTsTowel
Didn’t this guy have some of the league’s worst offenses in Buffalo and Jacksonville?
Posted on 1/27/22 at 12:32 pm to Boring
I think Jacksonville had a top 5 offense the year they went to the AFCCG.
I haven’t researched, but I did read on Twitter.
I haven’t researched, but I did read on Twitter.
Posted on 1/27/22 at 12:34 pm to kciDAtaE
quote:John Elway’s last 2 years, 1998 and 1999, Denver went to and won the Super Bowl (32 and 33). Granted, he spent his entire career in Denver after they traded for him.
It’s the only time I remember them doing that
And, of course, Peyton Manning in 2013 and 2015…winning a Super Bowl and losing a Super Bowl.
We’ll see if Denver lands Aaron Rodgers.
Posted on 1/27/22 at 12:53 pm to TTsTowel
The question will be what Denver has to give up to get Rodgers.
Posted on 1/27/22 at 1:14 pm to bcoop199
If Rodgers goes anywhere it will be Denver.
First of all, Green Bay wont trade him to an NFC team.
Second of all, Green Bay will take a $25 million cap hit if they trade or cut him before June 1st. Most likely Denver hired Hackett simply because they know Rodgers will not want to learn a new offense in such a short period of time and because he already knows Hackett's offense.
Finally, Denver has been prioritizing setting themselves up to get Rodgers for more than a year. No doubt in my mind they worked back channels with Rodgers agent to find out that he would sign off on Hackett being his head coach.
As far as compensation, Rodgers is 39 and is on a one year deal. No way Green Bay gets much more than a 1st rounder and couple 2nd or 3rds because Denver may only have him for one year. Denver has the 9th pick in the 1 st round plus their 2nd and 3rd as well as the Rams 2nd and 3rd. They also have $45 million in cap pace.
Not sure why people think Rodgers and Adams are a package deal. Green Bay can just franchise tag Adams so he is probably stuck there.
First of all, Green Bay wont trade him to an NFC team.
Second of all, Green Bay will take a $25 million cap hit if they trade or cut him before June 1st. Most likely Denver hired Hackett simply because they know Rodgers will not want to learn a new offense in such a short period of time and because he already knows Hackett's offense.
Finally, Denver has been prioritizing setting themselves up to get Rodgers for more than a year. No doubt in my mind they worked back channels with Rodgers agent to find out that he would sign off on Hackett being his head coach.
As far as compensation, Rodgers is 39 and is on a one year deal. No way Green Bay gets much more than a 1st rounder and couple 2nd or 3rds because Denver may only have him for one year. Denver has the 9th pick in the 1 st round plus their 2nd and 3rd as well as the Rams 2nd and 3rd. They also have $45 million in cap pace.
Not sure why people think Rodgers and Adams are a package deal. Green Bay can just franchise tag Adams so he is probably stuck there.
This post was edited on 1/27/22 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 1/27/22 at 1:22 pm to TTsTowel
Yeah. I took that as going to sign someone at end of career
Posted on 1/27/22 at 1:41 pm to BayouCatFan
quote:
because he already knows Hackett's offense.
It wasn't Hackett's offense, it was Shanahan's offense that Lafleur implemented in GB. Hackett may have been the OC, but the offensive scheme came from Lafleur.
Posted on 1/27/22 at 2:20 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Denver loves getting the last years out of a QB, but I guess it worked last time.
They won a ton of games for sure. But Manning doesn't sniff that last SB ring without a historically great defense his last year. Not sure AR is getting exactly that :/
Posted on 1/27/22 at 2:23 pm to BayouCatFan
quote:
econd of all, Green Bay will take a $25 million cap hit if they trade or cut him before June 1st.
The trade will "happen" but won't be official until 6/1
Posted on 1/27/22 at 2:27 pm to denvertiger
quote:Denver’s 2015 defense was one of the best of all time, it wasn’t just elite. Of course it’s doubtful Denver is able to replicate that in 2022.
They won a ton of games for sure. But Manning doesn't sniff that last SB ring without a historically great defense his last year. Not sure AR is getting exactly that :/
That being said, Denver’s defense was still really, really good in 2021. Top 5. A lot of that had to do with Vic Fangio. It also would’ve been much better if Denver didn’t have the injury bug they had.
Posted on 1/27/22 at 2:32 pm to BayouCatFan
quote:
First of all, Green Bay wont trade him to an NFC team.
He's already 38 and it's clear he's not going to try to play into his mid 40s like Brady, they shouldn't worry about him being in the same conference for a couple years.
This post was edited on 1/27/22 at 3:08 pm
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News