re: Cristiano Ronaldo accuser spells out rape claims and the events that followed in detail

He clearly knew she didn’t want to participate in the sex yet still made the conscious decision to stick his dick in her a-hole. That’s rape in all civilized countries.

quote:

---

I just understand what seems to have happened.

---

Me too, he raped her according to his own words

quote:

---

the way he talked of the incident makes me think he truly felt bad about doing that to her

---

Maybe. Or maybe that's just the thing you say when you get caught but you don't actually feel bad. Who knows.

quote:

---

It’s not like he roams the streets and brutalizes women in dark alleys. If you think there’s no difference between that and this, that’s your opinion.

---

Maybe there are varying degrees of rape, I don't know. But I'd hardly think that means I can "understand" what happened here and how he just accidentally raped a chick.

And he's also denied her rape allegations as well. And he can regret a sexual encounter without it being rape.

quote:

---

Yea, I asked the same questions earlier in this thread, but a couple of posters seem to think it's legit...not that that makes it so, just pointing out.

---

This is the most glaring, but this is one of the few things that makes me a least skeptical of the reporting.

It’s a communication between two lawyers in a law firm representing him, and an additional “colleague.” Things that are odd or unclear:

1. Is a colleague another lawyer in the firm whose communication may be privileged?

2. Why not identify either colleague or the sender, especially the sender since that seems important?

3. How did they get this communication, especially if it’s privileged, bringing it back to the nameless people in that email?

3. Was it an attached document actually written by Ronaldo, or was it written by someone else, possibly the other lawyer?

4. Given the questionable release of it, the lack of information about the other parties in the exchange, the questionable practice of sending information like that in writing, and still have it easily available to access nearly 10 years later, due the authenticate it?

I know it’s a well-respected outlet, but given the importance of that document and the seriousness of its claims, it seems like subpar journalism to not do everything to make it as unquestionable as possible.

I also find it inexcusable for them to not try to reach out to LVPD to get a comment about the serious claim that why officer discouraged her from moving forward. And the identification of the officer who completed the interview is probably accessible, and if it’s not, they make no mention of even trying to obtain. They just quote her description of him and that’s it, even though the had no problem reaching out to get the original police report.

And what about the rape kit. Did they even try to see if one was done, or what the results were, whether they can release it or not? Again they just quote her about nurse being empathetic, and fail to follow-up on that.

And why mock Ronaldo for not following through on his lawsuit? Maybe that’s a cultural difference, but it seems unprofessional given the seriousness of the story. On top of the lack of due diligence to even verify basic information and instead takes the accusers story as fact, it just seems like the article was trying to tell a version that made him look as guilty and as bad as possible, rather than seeking the truth, even if it ends up being completely true.

I'm sure he's bi but I think he prefers men. But rape is about power and that's why rich and famous people do it and often get away with it. I just hope the truth comes out and whichever part is lying faces due punishment.