- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: College Football Week 1/Futures Bet Thread
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:57 pm to LSUAlum2001
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:57 pm to LSUAlum2001
quote:
College Football Week 1/Futures Bet Thread
btw.
I like to party
Posted on 8/16/16 at 9:00 pm to dgtiger3
quote:
I'm probably in the minority but I still think maybe 10% of the "touts" are honest guy...lol
I am really skeptical on all touts... used to work at ESPN Radio in Las Vegas, where touts would pay for airtime and then host a show or be a guest on a show. These appearances were nothing more than paid advertisements to lure people to their tout sites, disguised as them being experts on handicapping hosting a legit show. RJ Bell, Vegas Dave, Vegas Runner, Pregame, they are all frauds.
There is only one pick selling entity that I think is actually somewhat legit, and that is Right Angle Sports. That's it, no one else would I trust.
Touts are affiliated with sportsbooks and get a cut of the money that is lost to the books, so they have a vested interest in not giving their clients winning picks.
In the end, I stand by the notion if you really had an edge, you'd guard the secrets to that edge at all costs, for no amount of money would you sell the picks since you have a license to print money.
Posted on 8/16/16 at 9:05 pm to goldennugget
One more note about the Clemson vs Auburn game... It's an 8pm Central kick at Jordan-Hare. Tough opening game situation for a heavily favored Clemson with big expectations.
Posted on 8/16/16 at 9:23 pm to goldennugget
quote:
goldennugget
Fair enough, I know all of those guys you mentioned have been exposed, a lot of them in that big article that came out a few months ago.
Personally I've had a very tough time tailing anyone over the years as well. Have gotten comfortable trusting a few of the quality posters on here over the years on a few sides.
Posted on 8/16/16 at 9:34 pm to dgtiger3
quote:
Fair enough, I know all of those guys you mentioned have been exposed, a lot of them in that big article that came out a few months ago.
Yeah that Deadspin article made me hard as a rock. It's about time someone called them out. I can't stand Colin Cowherd and ESPN and the NYT lending credibility to these scam artists.
quote:
Personally I've had a very tough time tailing anyone over the years as well. Have gotten comfortable trusting a few of the quality posters on here over the years on a few sides.
Agree 100%. The best people to tail are just run of the mill people who give out their plays because they enjoy it and just want to help others and share their insights, not because they are putting chum in the water for their eventual tout path if they hit a hot streak.
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:02 pm to goldennugget
quote:
RJ Bell, Vegas Dave, Vegas Runner, Pregame, they are all frauds.
Not a fraud. Is he even a tout? He and I used to exchange picks a couple years ago up at Westgate but I haven't seen him since the World Series KC bet last year. The guy literally lives the life everyone on the OT claims to live.
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:05 pm to dgtiger3
quote:
Definitely a lot of truth to what you posted, but SDV seems like a savvy poster and I remember him talking this guy up a little bit last fall, I think he has been pretty solid for a couple of seasons.
I'm probably in the minority but I still think maybe 10% of the "touts" are honest guy...lol
SDV is the man. His 1 play bombs are sick
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:20 pm to goldennugget
I came up with some mathematical based system in 2007 and it was always bouncing between 56% and 61% year to year ATS.
I'm going back to the original formula because my dumbass thought I could improve on that % and I tweaked it to where it was all over the place. Great one week, in the shitter the next.
6-4 every week? Yes, please!
I'm going back to the original formula because my dumbass thought I could improve on that % and I tweaked it to where it was all over the place. Great one week, in the shitter the next.
6-4 every week? Yes, please!
This post was edited on 8/16/16 at 10:25 pm
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:32 pm to LSUAlum2001
quote:
I came up with some mathematical based system in 2007 and it was always bouncing between 56% and 61% year to year ATS.
I'm going back to the original formula because my dumbass thought I could improve on that % and I tweaked it to where it was all over the place. Great one week, in the shitter the next.
6-4 every week? Yes, please!
Share? Friend?
I haven't figured out the ol' excel spreadsheet simulation stuff. I just read stats/articles/thoughts.
Posted on 8/16/16 at 11:01 pm to HailToTheChiz
I ain't sharing shite, but I will post the picks. 
This post was edited on 8/16/16 at 11:02 pm
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:49 am to LSUAlum2001
I'll try to join you guys while I have some free time for a month or two. Hopefully I can contribute something worthwhile, but it will take me at least a few days to catch up.
I used to do well with totals 5-10 years ago, before the rule changes and up-tempo offenses turned the game into basketball on grass. Now I basically only bet Overs unless something really sticks out.
I'm very familiar with this. A friend of mine would play only these plays, and he had crazy (winning and losing) swings. He told me one time he turned $1K into $34K in a month, and lost it all in a week, and I actually believe it. Why? Because I've seen him crush at an 80% clip for a few weeks (with many bets daily), then have the opposite happen for just as long. At first I thought it was just short-term variance, but it happened too consistently, across multiple sports. Unfortunately, after years of tracking, we never could find a "trigger" for the hot and cold streaks.
A week 1 example would be Auburn. My first thought is that I would want at least 10, maybe even 14, to side with them against a powerhouse like Clemson. But, somehow they will probably keep it close, and may even win.
I used to do well with totals 5-10 years ago, before the rule changes and up-tempo offenses turned the game into basketball on grass. Now I basically only bet Overs unless something really sticks out.
quote:
I rode this strategy and this strategy alone to a great 2014. I basically made bets that I was really uncomfortable making, played the opposite of what the "common sense" play was and heavily faded the public. Ended up like +20 units at the end of the year.
I'm very familiar with this. A friend of mine would play only these plays, and he had crazy (winning and losing) swings. He told me one time he turned $1K into $34K in a month, and lost it all in a week, and I actually believe it. Why? Because I've seen him crush at an 80% clip for a few weeks (with many bets daily), then have the opposite happen for just as long. At first I thought it was just short-term variance, but it happened too consistently, across multiple sports. Unfortunately, after years of tracking, we never could find a "trigger" for the hot and cold streaks.
A week 1 example would be Auburn. My first thought is that I would want at least 10, maybe even 14, to side with them against a powerhouse like Clemson. But, somehow they will probably keep it close, and may even win.
This post was edited on 8/17/16 at 2:28 am
Posted on 8/17/16 at 2:07 am to bisonduck
quote:
Rutgers is that level of bad but my problem is it being the first game of the year.
I can agree with you there. Way too many unknowns early in the season. I don't bet for real, but I have a predictive model I developed that I like trying out on Sportsplays starting around week 6. I did really well last year with it. My percentage was actually around 69% if I take out some bets I made just when I was bored and wanted to watch weekday night CFB with a rooting interest.
I'm going to try it starting week 1 this year and just see what week it starts becoming more accurate.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 8:10 am to LSUAlum2001
Anyone use BetDSI.com? Looks like they have a 100% bonus for new members which is intriguing. They do a bunch of advertising on Barstool... Only place I've heard of them though.
Tired of Bovada dragging arse putting lines up.
Tired of Bovada dragging arse putting lines up.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 8:30 am to TDawg1313
quote:
My percentage was actually around 69%
there is always at least one every single year
Posted on 8/17/16 at 8:36 am to JG77056
quote:
Not a fraud. Is he even a tout? He and I used to exchange picks a couple years ago up at Westgate but I haven't seen him since the World Series KC bet last year. The guy literally lives the life everyone on the OT claims to live.
No Vegas Dave isn't a tout like the others. He actually isn't a bad guy. I labelled him as a fraud but that might be a bit too much.
The issue with Vegas Dave is that the sports media thinks that because he A) Lives in Las Vegas and B) Wagers a lot of money on games, that he must be some kind of awesome handicapper that makes a living off of betting on sports.
Does he have good sports knowledge? Yes
Does he bet that much money on games? Yes
Does he have a lot of money? Yes
Is he a long term winner? NO
The sports media treats him like some kind of long term winner deep pockets simply by betting on sports.
No different from Floyd Mayweather. You only hear about his big bets when he wins.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 8:37 am to TDawg1313
quote:
I can agree with you there. Way too many unknowns early in the season. I don't bet for real, but I have a predictive model I developed that I like trying out on Sportsplays starting around week 6. I did really well last year with it. My percentage was actually around 69% if I take out some bets I made just when I was bored and wanted to watch weekday night CFB with a rooting interest.
I would back test this at least 5 seasons.
I'd be careful with sites like Sportsplays, BetLabs, and their "system creator" tools. The stats they use for the variables are elementary and not predicative at all.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 8:57 am to goldennugget
quote:
The stats they use for the variables are elementary and not predicative at all.
I've yet to figure out what is actually "predicative", if anything.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 8:57 am to rocket31
Ohio sports treating you alright this year...
Posted on 8/17/16 at 9:00 am to HailToTheChiz
For NFL I'm hooked on Net YPP differential with a factor and 'true' homefield adjustments... NCAAF is all market-based for me.
I'll delve into the NFL calcs with visuals in those threads.
I'll delve into the NFL calcs with visuals in those threads.
Popular
Back to top


0






