Started By
Message

re: Clayton Kershaws Average Outing in the Playoffs

Posted on 10/24/18 at 3:59 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107796 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

And he is still letting fewer runners on base and striking out more and walking fewer. Ie, things that usually play out over a 162 game sample size but usually dont in three or four starts where the innate randomness of baseball can frick you
The fact Kershaw has a lower WHIP than Maddux, yet an ERA of almost 1.5 more, shows something maybe amiss there


A WHIP of 1.097 just doesnt correlate with an ERA over 4


Lester hates me and playoff Kershaw, so I would like to see his take on that
This post was edited on 10/24/18 at 4:00 pm
Posted by RedHawk
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
9510 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

Do you have a calculator for this?


I don't, found an article. Same article said that Maddux put together the best 120 inning stretch in Postseason history. Kind of a weird sample size though.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149262 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:04 pm to
Neither does his steikepit and walk rates. He literally is the same or slightly worse in every single important statistic that suggests true performance or performance that we can use to predict future performance

The only true legitimate stat that he takes a real hit on is homeruns. But even then, he shouldnt be dealing with the ERA that he has when he still has dome everything else so well
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
85758 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

You forgot the 9-9 W-L record

It's obvious that he dominates inferior teams but when going against good players, he's below average.

Same said about his WS competition, especially in American league parks.

He's basically the most overrated "dominate" pitcher I can remember.

He's also going to play his entire career in the NL (which vastly skews numbers in his favor).

I'll take Curt Schilling in a blink before Kershaw.
why did you have to go full retard after a very concise OP that made a good case using actual data?
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149262 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:06 pm to
Kershaws overall playoff resume when his peripherals are still pretty damn good is the single biggest signal to me that the playoffs are completely and totally random with no real rhyme or reason
This post was edited on 10/24/18 at 4:07 pm
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:07 pm to
quote:


its like the playoffs are totally a crapshoot


I mean 140 plus innings is a decent sample size.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149262 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:09 pm to
I dont have much faith in 140 innings over like 8 years. Those are 8 separate small sample sizes imo, and once again, the majority of the numbers that we think are better indicators of true performance still suggest hes pitching ok over those 140 innings
This post was edited on 10/24/18 at 4:11 pm
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
59227 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

steikepit


Is this an autocorrect? Some kind of weird, German dungeon porn?
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149262 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:24 pm to
Yes to both
This post was edited on 10/24/18 at 4:25 pm
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19189 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:32 pm to
The lengths people will go to make excuses for Kershaw is hilarious. When we rank pitchers all time Bumgarner will rightfully be ranked above Kershaw as the best of this era
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149262 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

When we rank pitchers all time Bumgarner will rightfully be ranked above Kershaw as the best of this era
and yet I'm the one people act like has the crazy opinion
This post was edited on 10/24/18 at 4:39 pm
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
42189 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

The lengths Westcoasag will go to make excuses for Kershaw is hilarious.


Fixed.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149262 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:35 pm to
And here we go. People on here only remember when I dont agree with the idea that Kershaw isnt "clutch" and "bad" in the playoffs but magically forget all the times I call him inconsistent, not as good as he is during the season, or put a whole lot of the blame of last years world series on him
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
26300 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

2.33 ERA (lower than career ERA), 0.97 WHIP (lower than career WHIP), 9.7 SO/9, 4.38 SO/Walk Ratio

Kershaw's career numbers in interleague

17-4, 2.14 ERA, 0.93 WHIP, 9.8 SO/9, 4.91 SO/Walk Ratio (All better numbers than his career stats)


What is this, some kind of commie gobbeldy-asian?


Write something that doesn't try to dispel what everyone's eyes have seen for a decade. He cracks in big spots...
Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8695 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:54 pm to
Your eyes lie. The sooner you realize that, the sooner you’ll stop embarrassing yourself on the internet
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
42189 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

People on here only remember when I dont agree with the idea that Kershaw isnt "clutch" and "bad" in the playoffs but magically forget all the times I call him inconsistent, not as good as he is during the season, or put a whole lot of the blame of last years world series on him




We are well aware of your schizophrenia which is why we are nice to you.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
73865 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

He absolutely is inconsistent,



sounds like you agree he's a choker in the playoffs and it's arguing semantics every playoff season
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
38898 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Secondary stuff lacked location and didn't have a lot of movement


That strike zone last was the size of a nat.
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 5:28 pm to
Kershaw is the Drew Brees of the MLB. Chokes when the pressure is on.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19189 posts
Posted on 10/24/18 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

and yet I'm the one people act like have the crazy opinion


Isn't the goal to win the WS? There are very few scenarios where Kershaws GOAT level RS production over Madbums allstar level production is the difference in making the playoffs especially in the new playoffs system. But Madbums GOAT level playoff production vs Kershaws poor playoff production is going to make an enormous difference
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram