- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:12 pm to TheWalrus
I am not surprised at all that the "refs" didn't even look at it.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:12 pm to KillerNut9
quote:according to the rules yes. That was textbook targeting
What else is the safety supposed to do in that situation? Let a diving WR make the catch?
Helmet to helmet on a defenseless player
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:12 pm to KillerNut9
quote:
What else is the safety supposed to do in that situation?
He led with his head
I don't like the rule but that was 100% targeting...and an easy one to call.
This wasn't close
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No review means the Big10 made a phone call
Out of all people, I thought you were better than this.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:13 pm to Dr RC
The inevitable, flip the game upset-thwarting turnover td. Good job, going away from the unstoppable run Rutgers.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:13 pm to taylork37
quote:
Out of all people, I thought you were better than this
There isn't any rational explanation
I've seen 1/10 of that be targeting WITHOUT the injury
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:13 pm to Saint Alfonzo
You stole my image! I'm the real buttermilk pancakes.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:14 pm to taylork37
Terrible
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:14 pm to Buttermilk Pancakes
Backfoot Max just hangs it up there
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:14 pm to SirWinston
Johnson really threw that ball anyway.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:14 pm to SirWinston
What on Earth is Max Johnson doing
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:14 pm to lsupride87
quote:
according to the rules yes. That was textbook targeting Helmet to helmet on a defenseless player
I’m sure you said the same about the MHJ hit in January
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:15 pm to TheWalrus
Mertz knocked out of the Gator game.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He led with his head I don't like the rule but that was 100% targeting...and an easy one to call.
Of all the ridiculous ticky tack calls that were called targeting, that one seemed like the most obvious to me based on how the rule is written
he lowered, launched up at the head on a player who was clearly defenseless…and it’s not even looked at?
which criteria didn’t that hit meet?
This post was edited on 11/4/23 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:15 pm to KillerNut9
quote:Actually, I did
I’m sure you said the same about the MHJ hit in January
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:15 pm to KillerNut9
This dude giving an explanation on that targeting hit is a gaslighting cocksucker.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:16 pm to KillerNut9
Ohio State fans have spent all offseason bitching about a borderline targeting call and can’t even acknowledge a blatant no call that goes in their favor.
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:16 pm to Eighteen
quote:
Of all the ridiculous ticky tack calls that were called targeting, that one seemed like the most obvious to me based on how the rule is written
he lowered, launched up at the head on a player who was clearly defenseless…and it’s not even looked at?
AND he suffered a head/neck injury from it
Posted on 11/4/23 at 1:16 pm to Eighteen
quote:
he lowered, launched up at the head on a player who was clearly defenseless…and it’s not even looked at?
It's the Big 10's golden goose, man. Not sure why you're surprised.
Page 11 of 47
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News