- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Caitlin Clark makes WNBA history as first rookie to record triple-double
Posted on 7/7/24 at 9:48 pm to TackySweater
Posted on 7/7/24 at 9:48 pm to TackySweater
quote:
You’d think being such a huge draw would at least increase your hometown attendance by more than ~15%
I wouldn't. Maybe you would.
15% attendance boost is a lot for a female basketball player.
I wouldn't buy tickets to watch any of them.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 10:07 pm to TackySweater
quote:
It’s actually about 1/5 of her offensive rebounds lol
How many players from her team are on the court when she is playing?
Posted on 7/7/24 at 10:40 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
wouldn't. Maybe you would.
I’m just going off of what is currently happening in the wnba. You wouldn’t think the supposed second biggest draw in the league could pull at least 5% of the increases that the biggest draw is pulling?
I guess that goes to show you how minuscule what Reese is doing actually is in comparison. 4%? lol
quote:
15% attendance boost is a lot for a female basketball player.
So what’s 400%?
Posted on 7/7/24 at 10:40 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
How many players from her team are on the court when she is playing?
I’m assuming 4
Posted on 7/7/24 at 11:06 pm to TackySweater
quote:
You wouldn’t think the supposed second biggest draw in the league could pull at least 5% of the increases that the biggest draw is pulling?
obviously you aren't very good at math but Fever attendance is up 12,000 per game and Sky attendance is up 1,400 per game.
that is over double more than 5%
Also it's dumb to continuously compare Reese to Clark rather than to every other WNBA player to ever play.
This post was edited on 7/7/24 at 11:18 pm
Posted on 7/7/24 at 11:19 pm to pioneerbasketball
Can't wait for college football to start.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 11:21 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
obviously you aren't very good at math but Fever attendance is up 12,000 per game and Sky attendance is up 1,400 per game.
Does that include games that the Fever played the Sky? I’d like to know the increase in attendance without those games but I’m not expecting anyone to do the work
Posted on 7/7/24 at 11:24 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
Does that include games that the Fever played the Sky? I’d like to know the increase in attendance without those games but I’m not expecting anyone to do the work
yeah but they've only played 1 game in Chicago. attendance was 9800 for that one. it was 9,025 for their last home game against minnesota.
seems like they opened extra seating because 9,025 seems to be the normal "sell-out" and even for Clark they could only get to 9,800.
Depaul's arena is pretty small.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 11:59 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
yeah but they've only played 1 game in Chicago. attendance was 9800 for that one. it was 9,025 for their last home game against minnesota.
seems like they opened extra seating because 9,025 seems to be the normal "sell-out" and even for Clark they could only get to 9,800.
Depaul's arena is pretty small.
.
Clark herself even mentioned how the Sky dropped the ball by not putting the game in the United Center....
LINK
but in fairness to the Sky (who are losing money hand over fist with Reese) likely didn't want to waste anymore money renting out real arenas because Angel can't draw anything more than 700 people over the current league attendance average.
This post was edited on 7/8/24 at 12:04 am
Posted on 7/8/24 at 1:00 am to Corinthians420
You are still here embarrassing yourself, mate.
Posted on 7/8/24 at 5:23 am to ZIGG
quote:
but in fairness to the Sky (who are losing money hand over fist with Reese)
Delusional. Reese contract is 4 years, $350k. They are selling 1,400 more tickets per game this year and the upper deck standard tickets go for $60+ each so she is making them a minimum extra $84,000 in ticket sales per game plus concessions/merch. The real number is a lot higher because most of their tickets cost even more. For Wednesdays game the only non-resale tickets available are $400 and $600 a piece. For Saturdays game the only tickets still available cost $175-$350 each.
She isn't costing them anything.
Chicago tickets are up 3x what they were last year on resale value thanks to Reese.
This post was edited on 7/8/24 at 5:43 am
Posted on 7/8/24 at 5:45 am to Corinthians420
Outside of games that Chicago had played against Indiana (Caitlyn), their attendance is the same as last season.
Caitlyn is the only needle mover in that league’s history and the attendance and tv ratings confirm it. So does merchandise. Her merchandise has outside the entire rest of the league combined.
Caitlyn is the only needle mover in that league’s history and the attendance and tv ratings confirm it. So does merchandise. Her merchandise has outside the entire rest of the league combined.
Posted on 7/8/24 at 5:56 am to Dairy Sanders
quote:
Outside of games that Chicago had played against Indiana (Caitlyn), their attendance is the same as last season.
this is demonstrably false.
the numbers are easily accessed on the internet, but you Clark stans (yet you still spell her name wrong
Sky averaged 7,241 fans per home game last year. If you remove their home game against Clark they have 76,700 attendance this year through 9 home games for an average of 8,522 per game. That's a 17.6% bump this year for the Sky in ticket sales for games without Clark.
This post was edited on 7/8/24 at 6:08 am
Posted on 7/8/24 at 6:55 am to Corinthians420
Through just five home games this year, the Fever already suprassed their home attendance numbers from last year. Insane.
I was at Gainbridge on Saturday, and there was an hourlong wait before, at halftime, and after the game to get into their team store and buy merch.
Caitlin mania is real.
I was at Gainbridge on Saturday, and there was an hourlong wait before, at halftime, and after the game to get into their team store and buy merch.
Caitlin mania is real.
Posted on 7/8/24 at 7:07 am to TackySweater
quote:
I’m assuming 4
So 1/5 offensive rebounds being her own shot seems in proportion
Posted on 7/8/24 at 8:14 am to Corinthians420
quote:
obviously you aren't very good at math but Fever attendance is up 12,000 per game and Sky attendance is up 1,400 per game.
Indiana fever increase from 23-24: 413%
Chicago sky increase from 23-24: 20%
So Reese has been able to do 4.8% of what Clark has been able to do lol
quote:
Also it's dumb to continuously compare Reese to Clark rather than to every other WNBA player to ever play.
Of course it is for you lol. Clarks accomplishments make Reese’s look absolutely minuscule.
Like I said. If Reese is such a huge draw, why is she only able to do less than 5% of what Clark is doing lol
This post was edited on 7/8/24 at 8:18 am
Posted on 7/8/24 at 10:40 am to Corinthians420
This Corinthians clown is a short yellow bus rider.
Go back to the rant
Go back to the rant
Posted on 7/8/24 at 11:23 am to SeeeeK
quote:
This Corinthians clown is a short yellow bus rider. Go back to the rant
He’s got a really inflated idea of what his goddess is bringing to the game when you compare it to what Clark has been able to do.
But of course, he thinks we shouldn’t compare her to Clark lol
Posted on 7/8/24 at 11:28 am to TackySweater
I would be willing to bet that the Chicago team's gate has increased because of CC's exposure to the league - a "rising tide lifts all boats" phenomenon.
Popular
Back to top


1





