- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Brady > Brees
Posted on 1/20/19 at 9:24 pm to Nonetheless
Posted on 1/20/19 at 9:24 pm to Nonetheless
Goff>brees
Goff w/o his go to guy, and his rb still not 100%. And he out played Brees.
Goff w/o his go to guy, and his rb still not 100%. And he out played Brees.
0
Posted on 1/20/19 at 9:25 pm to RollTide1987
quote:They went 11-5 without him that year and 3-1 when he was suspended. I don't care about pre-Patriots. He grew. 14-6 without Brady shows it's mostly Bellichik.
That 2008 season was an anomaly as they returned just about every player from a perfect 16-0 the previous year - sans Brady of course. That was also the last time the Patriots didn't make the playoffs.
Posted on 1/20/19 at 9:28 pm to Jake88
quote:
16-0 the previous year
quote:
They went 11-5 without him
A 5-game W/L difference in the NFL is fricking huge.
Posted on 1/20/19 at 9:28 pm to Jake88
They were 5 games worse without Brady
16-0. > 11-5
16-0. > 11-5
Posted on 1/20/19 at 9:31 pm to DBG
Why? Brees 8-7 with 1 Super Bowl and 1 NFC Championship. That ain’t GOAT status.
Posted on 1/20/19 at 9:31 pm to bomber77
quote:It was the next year, all bets are off. It was 11-5 with Matt frickin Cassell. I'm not saying Brady isn't great but I am saying he's not the greatest. In fact, one can't really know the greatest, especially with the rules changes that make it exceedingly easy to pass today compared to 25 years ago.
They were 5 games worse without Brady
16-0. > 11-5
This post was edited on 1/20/19 at 9:33 pm
Posted on 1/20/19 at 9:33 pm to Nonetheless
Brees > Brady
...at making horrible investments
...at making horrible investments
Posted on 1/20/19 at 9:38 pm to Jake88
He and Montana are the 2 best I’ve seen. They seem to have something extra. Some guys have the stats but they aren’t out there throwing 3rd and long darts in 15 degree windy weather at 41 years old with legacy on the line. I don’t care how good BB is, no one can coach that.
Posted on 1/20/19 at 9:38 pm to Jake88
quote:
It was 11-5 with Matt frickin Cassell.
QBing the exact same team that went 16-0 the year before. If you go 16-0 in the NFL you are obviously a very talented team. It's a testament to how good Brady is considering they lost 5 games and failed to make the playoffs after Brady went down with an ACL injury.
If Brady plays all of 2008 they are likely 15-1 or 14-2 and back in the Super Bowl.
This post was edited on 1/20/19 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 1/20/19 at 9:42 pm to RollTide1987
quote:Good Lord, you don't know that. The year Brady came back they went 10-6.
If Brady plays all of 2008 they are likely 15-1 or 14-2 and back in the Super Bowl.
Posted on 1/20/19 at 9:53 pm to Froman
As big a Saints fan I am, after today, you would be retarded to argue Brees>Brady. It is what it is.
Posted on 1/20/19 at 9:54 pm to RollTide1987
Brady is the GOAT period no questions asked
Posted on 1/20/19 at 10:12 pm to Nonetheless
quote:Playoff Brees is better than playoff Brady. No question about it, though today isn't the best day to say that.
Brady > Brees
Brees is better individually across the board. And the Saints offense in Brees's postseason career score more and turn it over less than Brady.
Difference is, defense. That makes the Pats postseason teams wayyyyyyyyyy better than the Saints. But j that difference in success does not mean Brady is better than Brees in the postseason, there is nothing to back that up. Any argument would default to team success, which I already pointed out is because of defense, factually speaking.
Posted on 1/21/19 at 6:25 am to shel311
8-7 in playoffs is better than 29-10?
Cmon Shell this is bordering on Dirk isn't a HoF territory
Cmon Shell this is bordering on Dirk isn't a HoF territory
Posted on 1/21/19 at 6:34 am to Nonetheless
looks like your trolling failed big time
Posted on 1/21/19 at 6:46 am to Nonetheless
I get why people are pissed about the no call on the PI and I would be as well even though there were obvious missed calls on both sides
That being said, Brees did not play well coming down the stretch. He made some very questionable passes and was pretty lucky he got away with a few of them
That being said, Brees did not play well coming down the stretch. He made some very questionable passes and was pretty lucky he got away with a few of them
Posted on 1/21/19 at 8:31 am to Ghazi
quote:No, why would you even ask me that? Weird question from you.
8-7 in playoffs is better than 29-10?
Posted on 1/21/19 at 8:32 am to Nonetheless
Rodgers> brees also.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News