- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Basketball foul: touching the hand after the shot is in the air
Posted on 2/5/15 at 11:56 am to LNCHBOX
Posted on 2/5/15 at 11:56 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Not for what we're discussing. We're talking about someone impeding follow through after the ball leaves, not a shooter willfully not following through.
You didn't understand the analogy of the runner. It's the same as the shooter.
I'm out. Y'all don't get it.
Posted on 2/5/15 at 11:56 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
We're talking about someone impeding follow through after the ball leaves.
Which is exactly what walls tend to do. Impede.
Posted on 2/5/15 at 11:56 am to KosmoCramer
quote:
You didn't understand the analogy of the runner.
I get it. It's just not equivalent to what we've been talking about here.
Posted on 2/5/15 at 11:57 am to TheSexecutioner
quote:
Which is exactly what walls tend to do.
Which has what to do with running through the line? Goodness, LE's stupid has apparently rubbed off on yall.
Posted on 2/5/15 at 11:57 am to LNCHBOX
LNCHBOX, the only thing I can think is that you didn't read the part in his post about an invisible wall. An invisible wall is an exact comparable force to a wrecking ball.
That the reason running through the line is effective has nothing to do with what happens after you cross the line. Just like following through being effective has nothing to do with what happens after the ball is no longer touched.
quote:
Which has what to do with running through the line?
That the reason running through the line is effective has nothing to do with what happens after you cross the line. Just like following through being effective has nothing to do with what happens after the ball is no longer touched.
This post was edited on 2/5/15 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 2/5/15 at 11:59 am to TheSexecutioner
I'm not talking about that part. I only took issue with the running through the line part. lsupride got it.
Posted on 2/5/15 at 12:00 pm to LNCHBOX
We're taking about WHY shooters follow through and WHY runners run past the line.
Posted on 2/5/15 at 12:00 pm to LNCHBOX
Right, and "not following through" is what is making Lester's brain implode because he's heard following through is important for x y and z his whole life. But "not following through" is a crime the shooter commits when he does it to himself, which would affect the shot because it affects his application of force to the ball while it's still on his hand. If he's fouled after it's released, he still did everything right relevant to the shot, so it's not that he "didn't follow through" it's that "his follow through pose got interfered with" in a more literal sense.
Posted on 2/5/15 at 12:01 pm to LNCHBOX
LNCHBOX- the guy that is going to teach his kids the knuckleball shot....well, because rotation has no affect on accuracy
Posted on 2/5/15 at 12:01 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
lsupride got it.
Got what? He called you out for being an idiot and saying the exact same thing.
Posted on 2/5/15 at 12:02 pm to Lester Earl
Rotation is imparted after the ball has left your hand.
LE
LE
Posted on 2/5/15 at 12:03 pm to TheSexecutioner
It couldn't be more clear what I took issue with. But please go on.
ETA Him and I ended up saying the same thing. because I didn't read all the way, I was unnecessarily further clarifying what he clearly already said.
ETA Him and I ended up saying the same thing. because I didn't read all the way, I was unnecessarily further clarifying what he clearly already said.
This post was edited on 2/5/15 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 2/5/15 at 12:04 pm to LNCHBOX
Exactly what I figured 
This post was edited on 2/5/15 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 2/5/15 at 12:05 pm to TheSexecutioner
Comprehension isn't really your thing huh?
Posted on 2/5/15 at 12:05 pm to Lester Earl
quote:Speaking of deflection...
he's shooting a wide open 3. I assume he was able to follow through and land without any contact
Posted on 2/5/15 at 12:07 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Comprehension isn't really your thing huh?
What? I gave you the benefit of the doubt and assumed you were not an idiot but just saying illogical shite because you didn't read it fully. How is that on my comprehension when you continue to insist upon your incorrect point being clear and others understanding it?
Posted on 2/5/15 at 12:38 pm to tigeroarz1
I hate the fact that on defense you can't have your hands on them but on offense you can throw your stiff arm out there to shield the defender
Posted on 2/5/15 at 1:22 pm to Lester Earl
The reason you follow through is because you have to release the ball without slowing down. If you don't follow through with your wrist, then you are slowing your hand down. The follow through allows your wrist to maintain the proper speed throughout the motion so that the ball rolls off your fingers nearly the same every time.
But once the ball is gone from your hand, you can be hit by a truck and it won't matter.
But once the ball is gone from your hand, you can be hit by a truck and it won't matter.
Posted on 2/5/15 at 1:27 pm to PrimeTime Money
Yea, it's not like once the ball goes off of your finger tips you can twist your hand a certain way and change the motion of the ball
Posted on 2/5/15 at 1:33 pm to 21JumpStreet
quote:Not true. If you lean to the right or left, it will go that way. Like telling a golf ball to stop. It works.
Yea, it's not like once the ball goes off of your finger tips you can twist your hand a certain way and change the motion of the ball
Popular
Back to top


1



