Started By
Message

Baseball Reference now showing Negro League stats as major league stats

Posted on 6/15/21 at 9:54 pm
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 9:54 pm
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
70851 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 9:55 pm to
Manfred recognized them as major leagues.

I just wish he'd gone up to 1952 instead of 1948. Hank Aaron would be in first place again.
Posted by BennyAndTheInkJets
Middle of a layover
Member since Nov 2010
5593 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 9:59 pm to
Long time coming. This issue with not including these stats for years wasn't racism as many would like to believe, just data integrity. Large gaps in games, nonsensical figures, etc..

Last I checked, it had taken them over a decade to clean up all the stats the best they could.
Posted by NotoriousFSU
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2008
10177 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

data integrity. Large gaps in games, nonsensical figures, etc..


Sounds pretty racist.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34581 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 10:09 pm to
Everyone knows Negro League stats are mostly guesswork.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
44874 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 10:12 pm to
Professional baseballs newest WHIP leader according to BR pitched 22 innings during WW2
This post was edited on 6/15/21 at 10:14 pm
Posted by Amadeo
Member since Jan 2004
4808 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

Long time coming. This issue with not including these stats for years wasn't racism as many would like to believe, just data integrity. Large gaps in games, nonsensical figures, etc..

Last I checked, it had taken them over a decade to clean up all the stats the best they could.

Yep! No way to verify those 120 mph fastballs from Satchel Paige.
Posted by blzr
Keeneland
Member since Mar 2011
30084 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 10:18 pm to
Dumb
Posted by Mr. Elvert
Dallas
Member since Oct 2012
14974 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 10:24 pm to
PANDERING PANDERING PANDERING. I wonder how these recipients feel? I’d feel like a BELITTLED BAW
Posted by SportsGuyNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since May 2014
16953 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 10:30 pm to
Anyone with Negro League stats added gets an asterisk*
Posted by Diseasefreeforall
Member since Oct 2012
5482 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

I wonder how these recipients feel?

Almost all of them aren't feeling much these days.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42557 posts
Posted on 6/15/21 at 10:42 pm to
Birmingham had an MLB team
This post was edited on 6/15/21 at 10:43 pm
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17473 posts
Posted on 6/16/21 at 8:22 am to
No women's baseball league stats included?


He's ticked

Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 6/16/21 at 8:25 am to
I'd be curious to know how many are verified stats vs word of mouth type of stuff. In the early days a lot of these players played against townies. They need to be acknowledged as they are important for the history of the game but their stats should be separated like baseball reference does for those coming from overseas.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35437 posts
Posted on 6/16/21 at 8:26 am to
quote:

Everyone knows Negro League stats are mostly guesswork.


More like mythological. Nobody knows what really happened in the League. It's a shame.

There was a concerted effort by the black free press to pump up the Negro Leagues to gain acceptance...

And they outdid their white counterparts in hyperbole which was no small feat in the 1920s...sell, sell, well.
This post was edited on 6/16/21 at 8:28 am
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
25455 posts
Posted on 6/16/21 at 8:48 am to
Dumb in my opinion. The Negro League was a different league. That doesn't mean the players weren't awesome, because they showed they were once in the Major leagues.

Have a separate wing in the Hall and sperate data set highlighting them. Doesn't downplay anything they accomplished, it's just not the same.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47470 posts
Posted on 6/16/21 at 8:48 am to
This… my issue would be the quality of play. If the Negro Leagues can be a major league, why not make the SEC a major league 100 years from now? They’re almost certainly getting paid.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35437 posts
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:07 am to
Ken Burns can research the hell out of anything...

But in his baseball doc, the Negro League stories come across as yarns.

Great ballplayers but there was no rigorous record keeping.

And some of the venues were basically sandlots.

Negro League stats are in the ether. Prejudice made them untrustworthy to fault of their own. The history is just weak.
This post was edited on 6/16/21 at 9:09 am
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51235 posts
Posted on 6/16/21 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Yep! No way to verify those 120 mph fastballs from Satchel Paige.


Not having Satchel Paige in MLB during his prime is one of the great tragedies in baseball history.
Posted by Tigertown in ATL
Georgia foothills
Member since Sep 2009
29146 posts
Posted on 6/16/21 at 11:30 am to
quote:


Dumb in my opinion. The Negro League was a different league. That doesn't mean the players weren't awesome, because they showed they were once in the Major leagues.

Have a separate wing in the Hall and sperate data set highlighting them. Doesn't downplay anything they accomplished, it's just not the same.


Totally agree.
Is it a shame they weren’t in the MLB? Yes!
This is not righting a wrong. It’s changing facts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram