- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:29 pm to Finkle is Einhorn
Posted on 10/12/20 at 11:35 pm to Murph4HOF
FS1 is replaying the game.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 12:04 am to diddlydawg7
No way Culberson starts. Camargo probably takes the roster spot.
Lineup tomorrow is probably
Acuña RF
Freeman 1B
Ozuna DH
TDA C
Albies 2B
Swanson SS
Markakis LF
Riley 3B
Pache CF
Sandoval probably takes any big at bat from Pache and Riley moves to the outfield. Camargo can then come in and play 3B if we have the lead.
Or maybe they just move Riley to LF to start the game and bat Camargo 9th and at 3B. I would prefer starting Pache over Camargo but we’ll see.
Lineup tomorrow is probably
Acuña RF
Freeman 1B
Ozuna DH
TDA C
Albies 2B
Swanson SS
Markakis LF
Riley 3B
Pache CF
Sandoval probably takes any big at bat from Pache and Riley moves to the outfield. Camargo can then come in and play 3B if we have the lead.
Or maybe they just move Riley to LF to start the game and bat Camargo 9th and at 3B. I would prefer starting Pache over Camargo but we’ll see.
This post was edited on 10/13/20 at 12:10 am
Posted on 10/13/20 at 12:13 am to volfan30
All I know is, give Ozuna a blank check this offseason.
He has been so important to this team both on and off the field.
He has been so important to this team both on and off the field.
This post was edited on 10/13/20 at 12:14 am
Posted on 10/13/20 at 12:28 am to Broski
If I was Snit, my lineup tomorrow would be:
Acuna 9
Freeman 3
Ozuna 7
D'Arnaud 2
Albies 4
Swanson 6
Riley 5
Sandoval DH
Pache 8
Markakis has been terrible for awhile now and I don't see him doing anything at all against Kershaw. I know Ozuna is a liability in the outfield, but Pache and Acuna cover a ton of ground and may be able to help mask that a little.
Acuna 9
Freeman 3
Ozuna 7
D'Arnaud 2
Albies 4
Swanson 6
Riley 5
Sandoval DH
Pache 8
Markakis has been terrible for awhile now and I don't see him doing anything at all against Kershaw. I know Ozuna is a liability in the outfield, but Pache and Acuna cover a ton of ground and may be able to help mask that a little.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 12:33 am to VADawg
quote:
Sandoval DH
Lefty DH with Kershaw?
That's gonna be a no from me, Dawg.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 12:37 am to Broski
quote:
All I know is, give Ozuna a blank check this offseason.
Remember when Braves fans bitched about Liberty Media not spending money for players?
I remember.
This post was edited on 10/13/20 at 12:38 am
Posted on 10/13/20 at 6:51 am to Broski
Panda vs. Kershaw all time:
.234 (15-64) 0 HR 7 RBI
That's going to be a hard no from me.
.234 (15-64) 0 HR 7 RBI
That's going to be a hard no from me.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 6:58 am to sorantable
Awesome win last night... the Braves doing what they do and beating up relief pitching.
My guess is, we'll call up Ender. Lost an outfielder, call up an outfielder.
I don't see Ozuna doing anything other than DH.
Acuna - LF
Freddie - 1B
Ozuna - DH
D'arnaud - C
Ozzie - 2B
Dansby - SS
Riley - 3B
Markakis - RF
Pache - CF
Bench
Sandoval
Culbertson
Ender
Flowers
My guess is, we'll call up Ender. Lost an outfielder, call up an outfielder.
I don't see Ozuna doing anything other than DH.
Acuna - LF
Freddie - 1B
Ozuna - DH
D'arnaud - C
Ozzie - 2B
Dansby - SS
Riley - 3B
Markakis - RF
Pache - CF
Bench
Sandoval
Culbertson
Ender
Flowers
Posted on 10/13/20 at 8:24 am to Broski
Panda is a switch hitter but not a very good right handed hitter. The real issue with that lineup is Ozuna playing the field in such a big outfield.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 8:34 am to Broski
quote:
Lefty DH with Kershaw?
That's gonna be a no from me, Dawg.
well he's a switch hitter, so that wouldn't be the reason why.
the numbers Murph posted, however are relevant. I was thinking that he would be a good option as someone who had a lot of at bats against Kershaw over the years, so I was disappointed to see Murphy post the weak arse numbers.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 8:57 am to VinegarStrokes
I would’ve had Pache, Ender for pinch running, Hech and Camargo on the bench
Posted on 10/13/20 at 9:06 am to Finkle is Einhorn
I think you have to go ahead and play Pache at this point. I watched him at AA and it just sounded different when he made good contact. The Braves have made it this far with great pitching. Adding a great outfielder will only help.
.png)
Posted on 10/13/20 at 9:19 am to VinegarStrokes
But does anyone really have great numbers against Kershaw?
Posted on 10/13/20 at 9:40 am to Finkle is Einhorn
I think the Braves will either call Camargo or Ender up. I think they might lean Camargo and play him at 3rd base, Riley in LF, and Pache in center against a lefty. Braves won’t bench Markakis but I would give anyone playing time ahead of him right now. He put up a -0.4 war this year and has a .167 OBP this postseason. I would be surprised if he’s on a major league roster next year.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 10:12 am to Finkle is Einhorn
You need Flowers as well and they would have to remove a pitcher to carry 5 bench players.
They made the decision to carry Culberson over Hech after Hech was so bad offensively and defensively the last couple weeks with regular PT.
Ender’s sprint speed and defense were both way down in the metrics. I don’t know why they went with him over Pache for as long as they did.
They made the decision to carry Culberson over Hech after Hech was so bad offensively and defensively the last couple weeks with regular PT.
Ender’s sprint speed and defense were both way down in the metrics. I don’t know why they went with him over Pache for as long as they did.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 10:28 am to VinegarStrokes
quote:Another thing to keep in mind is that a good chunk of Sandoval's ABs against Kershaw was when Panda was much better player than he is in 2020.
I was thinking that he would be a good option as someone who had a lot of at bats against Kershaw over the years, so I was disappointed to see Murphy post the weak arse numbers.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 10:44 am to sorantable
quote:
But does anyone really have great numbers against Kershaw?
absolutely you are correct. my point was that I was hoping there would be some sort of underlying x-factor in having panda on the team lol. as murph says, those poor numbers were from his prime years as well (then again...they were also during Kershaw's younger/prime years) so there clearly isn't any real added value in starting panda unless absolutely necessary.
Posted on 10/13/20 at 10:46 am to Murph4HOF
Drank? Calling Drank? Where is Drank? Nowhere to be found after the Riley HR last night.
Page 41 of 43
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News