
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
All hail LSU.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:20 pm
If y'all have been living under a rock.
LA Techs president was basically forced to retire by ole Jeff.
Now if you care to follow all the time lines it all lines up.
I can post the time lines if someone is interested.
This search committee for the LA Tech president is a blanket.
The next person has already been chosen.
LINK
The story done here shows just how little the state cares about Louisiana tech and it's kicking arse in enrolment numbers.
LA Techs president was basically forced to retire by ole Jeff.
Now if you care to follow all the time lines it all lines up.
I can post the time lines if someone is interested.
This search committee for the LA Tech president is a blanket.
The next person has already been chosen.
LINK
The story done here shows just how little the state cares about Louisiana tech and it's kicking arse in enrolment numbers.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:21 pm to WeareLATech
You really should have capitalized the A in your username.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:23 pm to WeareLATech
This isn't some competition like you think it is. LA Tech is a great university for what it is but LSU is the flagship university of the state and 4x the size of LA Tech.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:33 pm to lsudave1
Yeah but the numbers are telling. And it's going to get even worse with Jeff's yes man.
Go look at the time line of how quick Dr. Henderson went from staying til the end of the year to leaving.
Steve Davidson is leaving the board at the end of the year . Which may have also played into Henderson leaving so quickly. I suspect that's not the reason.
So keep this up Jeff. Go ahead and make an enemy out of the Davidson's.
Go look at the time line of how quick Dr. Henderson went from staying til the end of the year to leaving.
Steve Davidson is leaving the board at the end of the year . Which may have also played into Henderson leaving so quickly. I suspect that's not the reason.
So keep this up Jeff. Go ahead and make an enemy out of the Davidson's.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:35 pm to WeareLATech
quote:
make an enemy out of the Davidson's.
Who?
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:45 pm to WeareLATech
quote:
LA Techs president was basically forced to retire by ole Jeff.
I have not heard this, but Jim Henderson has been great at several stops in his career…. UL System President, NSU President, and Tech President.
He’s made a real difference along the way and is held in high regard.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 2:57 pm to WeareLATech
Timeline is one word.
Also, regarding LA Tech:
Also, regarding LA Tech:
Posted on 10/21/26 at 3:01 pm to WeareLATech
quote:
Now if you care
We don't.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 3:13 pm to RummelTiger
quote:
Timeline is one word.
Beat me to it, and he just keeps using it over and over.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 3:13 pm to WeareLATech
That article is full of bullshite. Trying to argue that Tech, ULM, and ULL would experience a drop in their enrollment if they move down from FBS to FCS. I highly doubt that Sun Belt Conference football is a deciding factor in where many kids choose to go to school.
If they need more athletics funding, then go ask for booster donations, corporate sponsorships, or raise ticket prices. We bitch enough about the high cost of college these days. So how does it make sense to complain about how expensive college is, but then argue that schools like ULM, ULL, and LA Tech should add an athletics fee on top of tuition to fund athletics programs that have no realistic chance at competing at the highest levels.
If they need more athletics funding, then go ask for booster donations, corporate sponsorships, or raise ticket prices. We bitch enough about the high cost of college these days. So how does it make sense to complain about how expensive college is, but then argue that schools like ULM, ULL, and LA Tech should add an athletics fee on top of tuition to fund athletics programs that have no realistic chance at competing at the highest levels.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 3:16 pm to Ghost of Colby
quote:
I have not heard this, but Jim Henderson has been great at several stops in his career…. UL System President, NSU President, and Tech President.
He’s made a real difference along the way and is held in high regard.
I met him. I was impressed. It's clear why he has been successful.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 3:17 pm to WeareLATech
This may be an unpopular opinion especially for fans of the smaller schools but Louisiana has too many division 1 programs and the numbers back it up.
Louisiana currently has 12 division 1 athletic departments. That is tied for tenth most in the country for a state that is currently ranked 25th in population and 29th in annual budget. The other states with 12 D1 athletic departments are South Carolina and Tennessee. Tennessee has a 2.5 mil more people and an annual state budget of around $8 billion more. South Carolina is a bit closer to us with a population of only 900,000 more and a state budget of about $4 billion more.
Here's the biggest difference though: out of the 12 programs in SC, 10 have D1 football programs. Out of those 10, only 5 are public schools. Out of those 5 public schools with football, only 3 are FBS (Clemson, USC, and Coastal Carolina). In Tennessee, 10 of their D1 programs have football, 9 of them are public schools, and three have FBS programs (UT, Memphis, and MTSU)
On the other hand, Louisiana has 11 D1 schools with football programs. 10 of them are public schools, and 4 of them are FBS programs (LSU, ULL, La Tech, and ULM)
Only 10 states operate 4 or more public FBS programs. Out of those 10, Louisiana ranks 9th in state annual budget ahead of only Alabama. The next closest is Georgia who operates around $14 billion more per year.
The reality is football is expensive, and right now Louisiana is trying to operate a lot of public football programs with a shrinking population and a struggling budget. Somethings gotta give and maybe its time for some schools in the state to either up their student fees, drop down to FCS or if they are already in FCS, drop football all together.
Louisiana currently has 12 division 1 athletic departments. That is tied for tenth most in the country for a state that is currently ranked 25th in population and 29th in annual budget. The other states with 12 D1 athletic departments are South Carolina and Tennessee. Tennessee has a 2.5 mil more people and an annual state budget of around $8 billion more. South Carolina is a bit closer to us with a population of only 900,000 more and a state budget of about $4 billion more.
Here's the biggest difference though: out of the 12 programs in SC, 10 have D1 football programs. Out of those 10, only 5 are public schools. Out of those 5 public schools with football, only 3 are FBS (Clemson, USC, and Coastal Carolina). In Tennessee, 10 of their D1 programs have football, 9 of them are public schools, and three have FBS programs (UT, Memphis, and MTSU)
On the other hand, Louisiana has 11 D1 schools with football programs. 10 of them are public schools, and 4 of them are FBS programs (LSU, ULL, La Tech, and ULM)
Only 10 states operate 4 or more public FBS programs. Out of those 10, Louisiana ranks 9th in state annual budget ahead of only Alabama. The next closest is Georgia who operates around $14 billion more per year.
The reality is football is expensive, and right now Louisiana is trying to operate a lot of public football programs with a shrinking population and a struggling budget. Somethings gotta give and maybe its time for some schools in the state to either up their student fees, drop down to FCS or if they are already in FCS, drop football all together.
This post was edited on 10/21/26 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 10/21/26 at 3:20 pm to WeareLATech
How's that medical school coming?
Posted on 10/21/26 at 5:13 pm to WeareLATech
As long as Squire Creek stays open frick the Davidson’s.
Posted on 10/21/26 at 7:56 pm to WeareLATech
I will speak in general terms on what I heard about this.
Landry wants to name Cade Brumley as the new president. The Davidsons are mad because they do not have any input. I was told they are big/run Trumps local PAC.
I was told they are trying to work it out.
Is what I heard correct?
Landry wants to name Cade Brumley as the new president. The Davidsons are mad because they do not have any input. I was told they are big/run Trumps local PAC.
I was told they are trying to work it out.
Is what I heard correct?
Posted on 10/22/26 at 5:46 am to TigerBait2008
quote:
make an enemy out of the Davidson's.
Who?
The Davidsons are the oligarchy of Ruston/Choudrant, everyone bends the knee when they walk by, richest family in town.
They own Squire Creek.
The father made a ton of money in trucking.
Posted on 10/22/26 at 12:38 pm to Old Man and a Porch
I sure hope that's true
Posted on 10/22/26 at 12:46 pm to WeareLATech
quote:
So keep this up Jeff. Go ahead and make an enemy out of the Davidson's.
Jeff Landry is worried about one thing - Jeff Landry. And he proves it time and again. He continually does head scratching things, that he seems oddly oblivious to the fact that they are head scratching.
He got some points here for taking credit for Kiffin, but dude's still done some really mindless things and plenty of them.
I have no skin in this Tech thing and no knowledge of this situation, but it seems that those who do seem to think ole Jeff is bowing up to the wrong folks on this one - and he ain't one to walk things back so this one may come back to bite him....seems short sighted on his part - which also ain't surprising.

Popular
Back to top

10












