- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: According to Petey, USC will
Posted on 1/13/09 at 5:28 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Posted on 1/13/09 at 5:28 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Let's see. Most wins. Most major bowls, most major bowl wins. Tied for most NC's. Seems pretty straightforward.
HAHA! BCS BITCH!!
Split my arse!
0
Posted on 1/13/09 at 5:31 pm to Moustache
quote:
Besides, I think they could beat UF. We need a plus one at least!
Why should UF have to beat anyone else after beating 10 bowl teams including Oklahoma? Why should we need to let the 5th place team play for the title?
Posted on 1/13/09 at 5:34 pm to Weaver
I concur
Posted on 1/13/09 at 5:38 pm to Moustache
did anyone point out how stupid moustache's list of lsu players was?
Posted on 1/13/09 at 5:39 pm to BilJ
craig steltz has already not panned out in the NFL
Posted on 1/13/09 at 5:45 pm to PortCityTiger24
I CAN'T BELIEVE CAM VAUGHN DIDN'T BECOME AN ALL PRO!!!
when the broncos signed him as an UDFA they expected big things, but he just never lived up to all that undrafted hype
also flynn a 7th rd pick beats out Brohm (2nd rounder) for a back up job and he belongs on the bust list?
did this dumb frick put any thought into his list or did he just start naming random players?
when the broncos signed him as an UDFA they expected big things, but he just never lived up to all that undrafted hype
also flynn a 7th rd pick beats out Brohm (2nd rounder) for a back up job and he belongs on the bust list?
did this dumb frick put any thought into his list or did he just start naming random players?
This post was edited on 1/13/09 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 1/13/09 at 8:45 pm to Moustache
quote:
Moustache
you sure are sucking USC's balls on this thread...so I went back and scanned your some of your previous posts. its very interesting how many times you came on the MSB and replied to USC threads and sucked them off and how all your posts on the rants about LSU were ripping LSU/being negative.
im not buying you really being an LSU fan.....
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:04 am to The Easter Bunny
quote:USC played 7 bowl winners. USC's loss on the road in Corvallis was arguably less egregious than Florida's failure to hold serve at the Swamp against Ole Miss.
Why should UF have to beat anyone else after beating 10 bowl teams including Oklahoma? Why should we need to let the 5th place team play for the title?
Florida's only argument over USC to even be in the BCSCG was that win over Bama in the SECCG. We know that Bama pretty much dominated Florida for 3/4's of that SECCG, but Utah dispatched Bama with little trouble in the Sugar Bowl.
I'm just not convinced UF was better than USC, so their BCS Championship carries little weight as far as I'm concerned.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:10 am to loweralabamatrojan
From the Saints board. Best quote on Mays I have seen. 
quote:
If there ever was a perfect Saint, Mays is it. He is a big, fast, hard hitting, no tackling, interception dropping machine. He's Haslett's wet dream of wet dreams.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:18 am to 9Fiddy
I'm just glad he's sticking around to graduate and play another season at USC.
He's athletically talented to the point it's not fair, and he's got a mean streak a mile wide that sometimes gets him in trouble.
The man is good, but he's no Saint.
He's athletically talented to the point it's not fair, and he's got a mean streak a mile wide that sometimes gets him in trouble.
The man is good, but he's no Saint.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:25 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
The man is good, but he's no Saint.
They are talking about the football team, not Gabriel (I am not Catholic and don't know shite).
This post was edited on 1/14/09 at 3:44 am
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:39 am to 9Fiddy
quote:I was going for the double entendre there.
They are talking about the football team, not Gabriel.
FWIW, Gabriel might not be the best example, as Angels are not always Saints either (see Lucifer).
This post was edited on 1/14/09 at 3:44 am
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:43 am to loweralabamatrojan
I edited
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:44 am to 9Fiddy
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:46 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
St. Gabriel is the patron of communications workers
That is weird considering that is what my job is.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 3:48 am to 9Fiddy
The MSB is a mystically powerful thing.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 7:08 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
I'm just not convinced UF was better than USC, so their BCS Championship carries little weight as far as I'm concerned.
Well of course not. But SC knows the rules and agreed to them just like every other college team. Again, if you're so fricking good don't lose...ever! then we wouldn't have this problem.
quote:
USC played 7 bowl winners.
So because of this that makes USC better? Florida played 6 bowl winners...so what?! Read this...pay attention to the end
quote:
USC's loss on the road in Corvallis was arguably less egregious than Florida's failure to hold serve at the Swamp against Ole Miss.
Ole Miss > Oregon State...espically at that end of the year. Ole Miss spotted TT 14 pts before pistol whipping them. This was a TT team that beat the #1 team in the country at one point of the year and was a scoring machine.
Speaking of Oregon State didn't they muster an amazing 3 points in the Sun bowl against that powerhouse Big East team PITT?! WTF is that?
So take your rose pedals and shove'em up your arse along with the rest of your USC brothern. Have a conference championship game, get rid of the Pac 10 - Big 10 tie to the Rose bowl which would allow SC to play a more qualified/higer ranked team instead of some "tradition". Oh yea, don't lose to the Stanfords, UCLA, Oregon and Oregon States of the world!
Posted on 1/14/09 at 7:59 am to Mr. Shankly
Its sad that evry year after the NC game that USC has to whine about them not being NC. I didn't hear Utah or Texas crying. By the way, the PAC automatically gets a BCS bid. If you are the only team worth a shite in the conference you are in. No conference title game also. The argument of USC beat Auburn and Arkansas in two seperate years means nothing. Play in the SEC week in and week out and you will quickly see that USC would not be as successful. They are a great team don't get me wrong but they are overhyped regardless what any USC fans say. Without ESPN USC is just another good football team.
Posted on 1/14/09 at 8:09 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
USC played 7 bowl winners
Wait a minute I count only five
Oregon State
Oregon
Arizona
Cal
Notre Dame
Who are the other two?
Virginia NO BOWL
Ohio State LOST to Texas
Oregon State BEAT Pitt
Oregon BEAT Okie State
Arizona State NO BOWL
Washington State NO BOWL
Arizona BEAT BYU
Washington NO BOWL
California BEAT Miami
Stanford NO BOWL
Notre Dame BEAT HAWAII
UCLA NO BOWL
Penn State LOST
Basically you put a little fat in there to inflate your impressive "stat"
And it's not like you were one off...you were off by two! how pathetic
This post was edited on 1/14/09 at 8:25 am
Posted on 1/14/09 at 10:46 am to Mr. Shankly
If Oregon State wouldve thrown Samford and Memphis on the schedule like Ole Miss did, then they would 11-2 instead they went to Penn State and Utah.
Im not quite sure why everyone buys into the Florida losing at home to Ole Miss is a better loss.
Lets face it, Florida lost AT HOME to a team with a very easy schedule, thats all there is to it.
Im not quite sure why everyone buys into the Florida losing at home to Ole Miss is a better loss.
Lets face it, Florida lost AT HOME to a team with a very easy schedule, thats all there is to it.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News