- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ACC just rigged the result
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:50 pm to Geauxgurt
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:50 pm to Geauxgurt
ACC didn't rig anything
No one ever had possession of the ball and it was clear on the replay.
1. Calling that a TD was a joke in itself
2. Multiple angles never showed anyone with possession of the ball
For the original call to be correct, a VT receiver had to have possession. They didn't. Call reversed.
No one ever had possession of the ball and it was clear on the replay.
1. Calling that a TD was a joke in itself
2. Multiple angles never showed anyone with possession of the ball
For the original call to be correct, a VT receiver had to have possession. They didn't. Call reversed.
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:51 pm
0
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:51 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Um, his teammates hand is completely on the ball. Same with the Miami player who is out of bounds as well
Again, get your eyes checked because that didn’t happen.
Want to change your explanation again? First it was no control, then landed on his teammate that was out of bound and now it is a teammate magically touched the ball while out of bounds before he caught it.
You are pathetic at this.
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:52 pm
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:52 pm to lsupride87
quote:Cool, Does being in contact with someone who is out of bounds make you out of bounds, or does the out of bounds player have to be touching the ball?
Yes it did. It clearly shows #9 landing on his teammate who is out of bounds
Please quote the rule.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:52 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
So according to you, a defensive player just needs to step out of bounds and touch the receiver before they come down to make it incomplete for sure?
Not touch the receiver but touch the ball yes.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:53 pm to MOT
quote:
Please quote the rule.
He’s magically changed it to now saying the player was touching the ball (he wasn’t) while out of bounds.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:53 pm to Geauxgurt
I don’t think he ever had full possession of the ball. It was moving the whole time and ended up on the ground or in the Miami players’ hand.
I’m not sure they had enough to “overturn” it, but the officials clearly had no clue if it was a catch or not. I’m pretty sure they went into the review knowing they were going to decide if it was a catch or not there.
I’m not sure they had enough to “overturn” it, but the officials clearly had no clue if it was a catch or not. I’m pretty sure they went into the review knowing they were going to decide if it was a catch or not there.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:53 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
Want to change your explanation again? First it was no control, then landed on his teammate that was out of bound and now it is a teammate magically touched the ball while out of bounds before he caught it.
All three happened except it was a defender that touched it not a teammate.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:54 pm to lsupride87
It all comes down to when you believe the VT player had possession. If he had possession before the other players who were also touching the ball were out of bounds, then it is a catch and touchdown. If the other player that were also touching the ball were out of bounds before the VT player had possession, then it is incomplete.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:54 pm to MOT
Please show me a single anything showing the VT player with possession of the ball in bounds It was never close to occurring. The only ridiculous call was a ref saying he saw that
It was never close to occurring. The only ridiculous call was a ref saying he saw that Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:54 pm to RandySavage
quote:
Not touch the receiver but touch the ball yes.
That’s not what he said. He said that he landed on a player that was out of bounds and that made it incomplete.
He’s been hit in the head with too many tennis balls, so this type of poor logic is to be expected.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:55 pm to LSBoosie
The giant still shot from twitter of the ball floating in the air is great
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:55 pm to lsupride87
quote:They can't show you anything. They just wanted VT to win and are butthurt it didn't happen.
Please show me a single anything showing the VT player with possession of the ball in bounds It was never close to occurring. The only ridiculous call was a ref saying he saw that
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:56 pm to Geauxgurt
I wanted it to be complete but I can't say in good conscience they got the call wrong.
The WR didn't maintain control through contact with the ground which wouldve completed the catch, at that point it's loose and catch hasn't been completed when #43 for Miami touches the ball while laying out of bounds. ball is dead at that point and incomplete
The WR didn't maintain control through contact with the ground which wouldve completed the catch, at that point it's loose and catch hasn't been completed when #43 for Miami touches the ball while laying out of bounds. ball is dead at that point and incomplete
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:56 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:Yeah if there’s anything the replay showed it’s that the out of bounds guys started grabbing for the ball after everyone hit the ground. Only one person could have had control when they fell.
He’s magically changed it to now saying the player was touching the ball (he wasn’t) while out of bounds.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:58 pm to lsupride87
It’s clear in the video above. Both he and the Miami defender are in bounds when he hits the ground with the ball in his hands. Then Miami player goes out of bounds and rips ball out.
If you want to claim that doesn’t confirm he had it long enough, fine, but it didn’t clearly show he did not control it long enough either.
The entire point is that with nothing to 100% confirm either way, the call in the field stands even if you think it was a bad call.
There is nothing in that replay that clearly showed it was 100% incomplete.
If you want to claim that doesn’t confirm he had it long enough, fine, but it didn’t clearly show he did not control it long enough either.
The entire point is that with nothing to 100% confirm either way, the call in the field stands even if you think it was a bad call.
There is nothing in that replay that clearly showed it was 100% incomplete.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:59 pm to RB10
quote:
I’m pretty sure they went into the review knowing they were going to decide if it was a catch or not there.
Which is against the rules.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:59 pm to MOT
quote:
Only one person could have had control when they fell.
that doesn't matter because he was going to the ground when he caught the ball he has to maintain control all through going to the ground. we've known that rule forever. he clearly lost control so he wouldve needed to regain control without someone out of bounds touching it for it to be a catch.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:59 pm to MOT
quote:
Yeah if there’s anything the replay showed it’s that the out of bounds guys started grabbing for the ball after everyone hit the ground. Only one person could have had control when they fell.
It’s not like the Miami player was on top of him ripping the ball.
The fact it came out at all with the Miami player laying on his back and having 1 hand on the ball tells me the receiver didn’t have full control of it in the first place.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:59 pm to Marciano1
Yeah, a lot going on but ultimately I feel 99.9% confident that he never caught it to begin with so all the other variables that complicate it are actually irrelevant.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 11:00 pm to RB10
quote:
The fact it came out at all with the Miami player laying on his back and having 1 hand on the ball tells me the receiver didn’t have full control of it in the first place.
The video above clearly shows the Miami player reach with two hands from his back on the ground to rip for the ball because he lost in the air.This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 11:01 pm
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News