- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:35 am to RB10
quote:
For frick sakes man. The only person in this argument trying to say something is certain is you.
I said in that screenshot the ball is past the line. You responded with “No it’s not.”
Does that not sound certain to you?
You are choosing to trust the official that couldn’t see the ball. I am choosing to trust the official that could see the ball.
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 9:36 am
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:40 am to LSBoosie
quote:
Because according to RB10, there is no way to know if what hit the ground is actually a football…
The ball certainly hit the ground. That doesn’t preclude it from being a catch though.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:40 am to LSBoosie
quote:
I said in that screenshot the ball is past the line. You responded with “No it’s not.”
Does that not sound certain to you?
Wrong, again.
You kept saying it was “clear” that he was past the line, which is just not true.
quote:
You are choosing to trust the official that couldn’t see the ball. I am choosing to trust the official that could see the ball.
They
fricking
Reviewed
The
Spot
Do you not understand that? They took all the same shite you keep posting, reviewed whether they think he got the spot, and determined there was no way to tell for sure.
I’m not going by the official that spotted the ball. I’m going by the one who took all of the available angles, reviewed them, and came to the conclusion that there was no way to say for certain that the ball ever crossed the line to gain.
God damn man. It must be exhausting to be so fricking dense.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:47 am to RB10
quote:
Wrong, again.
No I quoted what I said and what you responded with.
quote:
I’m going by the one who took all of the available angles, reviewed them, and came to the conclusion that there was no way to say for certain that the ball ever crossed the line to gain.
And I’m going by the NFL official that also review the exact same stuff and completely disagreed.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:54 am to LSBoosie
quote:
No I quoted what I said and what you responded with.
You tried to claim the screenshot showed the ball past the line, which it does not. Hence my reply.
quote:
And I’m going by the NFL official that also review the exact same stuff and completely disagreed.
Good for you. So, once again, we have differing opinions on the call from people.
I’m glad we can finally put the “it was clear” narrative to bed. It obviously wasn’t.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:56 am to RB10
quote:
You tried to claim the screenshot showed the ball past the line, which it does not. Hence my reply.
Yes. I’m asking you you know that the ball at that exact moment is not past the line. How did you determine that?
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:57 am to LSBoosie
quote:Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
I didn't think he got it then and this doesn't change my mind. But the guy is right, the ref on the Chiefs sideline should not have been the one to spot the ball. The Bills sideline ref obviously had a better view of it.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:57 am to LSBoosie
quote:
Yes. I’m asking you you know that the ball at that exact moment is not past the line. How did you determine that?
Because no visible part of the ball in the screenshot is past the line.
You really need to look up the definition of confirmation bias, because you’re at up with it.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:00 am to gdzgft28
quote:
The ball certainly hit the ground. That doesn’t preclude it from being a catch though.
That ball hit the ground with no one possessing it. How it turned into a Chiefs catch was pure referee magick.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:00 am to RB10
quote:
Because no visible part of the ball in the screenshot is past the line.
I disagree
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:02 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
I didn't think he got it then and this doesn't change my mind.
Careful. You’re going to make poor Boosie’s head explode.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:03 am to LSBoosie
quote:
I disagree
Ok
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:03 am to RB10
quote:
Careful. You’re going to make poor Boosie’s head explode
Just wait until you learn that the brown leather object shaped like a football on a a football field is actually a football…
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:07 am to LSBoosie
quote:
Just wait until you learn that the brown leather object shaped like a football on a a football field is actually a football…
If only we could have gotten a picture that actually showed one.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:09 am to LSBoosie
quote:
I said in that screenshot the ball is past the line. You responded with “No it’s not.”
Does that not sound certain to you?
I know you weren't responding to me but that screenshot is clearly not the right angle to make the call. That's from up above and at a severe angle. There's literally video that is directly inline with the sticks.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:18 am to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
That ball hit the ground with no one possessing it. How it turned into a Chiefs catch was pure referee magic
How do you determine possession?Worthy clearly had the ball in his right hand. The ball isn’t moving. He hand the end of it but he still had it. Then it never moved when it hit the ground. Had it moved or bounced then it’s obviously incomplete. But the ball never moved throughout the catch.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:22 am to gdzgft28
quote:
How do you determine possession?Worthy clearly had the ball in his right hand. The ball isn’t moving. He hand the end of it but he still had it. Then it never moved when it hit the ground. Had it moved or bounced then it’s obviously incomplete. But the ball never moved throughout the catch.
Straight nonsense, neither player fully possessed a ball that touched the ground. It was an incomplete pass.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:24 am to gdzgft28
quote:Dude. The only hands on the ball are two red gloves
How do you determine possession?Worthy clearly had the ball in his right hand.
Either it was incomplete as nobody had possession as it hit the ground, or Bishop had possession which would mean he is down with possession and therefore INT
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 10:26 am
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:26 am to lsupride87
quote:
Either it was incomplete as nobody had possession as it hit the ground, or Bishop had possession which would mean he is down with possession and therefore INT
If it was a catch it should have been an interception. I don’t think it was a catch though.
Either way, bad call for sure. Worst one of the game IMO.
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News