- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 4th and inches call decided the game
Posted on 1/27/25 at 8:19 am to AtlantaLSUfan
Posted on 1/27/25 at 8:19 am to AtlantaLSUfan
He turned his back. Ball.never crossed line. Josh allens own fault
1
Posted on 1/27/25 at 8:23 am to AtlantaLSUfan
Man, it smells like bitch in here.
Go Chiefs.
Go Chiefs.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 8:28 am to LSUTigresFan
He got it. If that was Mahomes on the sneak, they'd have marked it 2 yards beyond line to get.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 8:37 am to Cannon
quote:
He got it.
I just saw the video of the third down play. They actually converted the play before. lolo
The best video from the game so far isn't even this play. It is a catch they gave KC near the goal line that was clearly incomplete or an INT.
So glad I quit wasting my life watching that crap.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 8:42 am to RB10
Dude part of your argument is that you don’t know if the brown leather object that the quarterback is holding is actually a football. It’s embarrassing.
You also said that in the picture I posted that the ball, which you can clearly see. Is not past the line. What are you using to make that statement?
You also said that in the picture I posted that the ball, which you can clearly see. Is not past the line. What are you using to make that statement?
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 9:14 am
Posted on 1/27/25 at 8:45 am to AtlantaLSUfan
Kincaid dropped an easy catch. That's what lost it
Posted on 1/27/25 at 8:54 am to AtlantaLSUfan
The NFL has moved away from having to use the chain gang much by using the exact yard lines as first downs. While it definitely makes for a quicker more efficient process in determining first downs, it also gives the spotting referee much more power. As they are going to spot the ball, they know if they are giving a first down or not. Less chance of bias if you are going by the chain where the ref doesn’t know the exact position
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:13 am to LSBoosie
quote:
Dude part of your argument is that you don’t know if the brown leather object that the quarterback is holding is actually a football. It’s embarrassing.
The only person embarrassing themselves is you. Just look at all the people trying to explain the same thing to you that I am. You just don’t seem to understand it.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:14 am to RB10
Why is everyone arguing over this so much and not the blatant ridiculous call/no overturn of the catch earlier in the game?
RB10 surely you can’t support that one?
RB10 surely you can’t support that one?
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:15 am to RB10
In the picture I posted you said that the ball, which you can clearly see, is not past the line. What are you using to make that statement? I’m not talking about it being overturned. You said definitely that the football was not past the line, so what tools did you use to make that judgement?
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 9:18 am
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:15 am to lsupride87
Because according to RB10, there is no way to know if what hit the ground is actually a football…
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:17 am to lsupride87
quote:
Why is everyone arguing over this so much and not the blatant ridiculous call/no overturn of the catch earlier in the game?
RB10 surely you can’t support that one?
I’ve already said that was a much worse call against the Bills. I’ve also said the 3rd down spot was awful and I thought they got the 1st down then.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:18 am to LSBoosie
quote:
Because according to RB10, there is no way to know if what hit the ground is actually a football…
You’re so angry that you can’t wrap your little noggin around a simple concept. I’m starting to actually feel sorry for you.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:18 am to LSBoosie
quote:
In the picture I posted you said that the ball, which you can clearly see, is not past the line. What are you using to make that statement? I’m not talking about it being overturned. You said definitely that the football was not past the line, so what tools did you use to make that judgement?
My eyeballs, just like the official that reviewed the play.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:19 am to RB10
When you start saying stuff like this instead of addressing actual things that you said earlier in the thread it’s a bad look.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:19 am to RB10
quote:
My eyeballs, just like the official that reviewed the play.
Oh really because the official that had same view as that picture marked it as a first down? Again I’m not talking about if it was enough to overturn it on review or whatever. You definitively said that the ball was not across the line. So what did you use to make that statement? Because if you want to say that a ref agreed with you I can say the same thing.
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 9:22 am
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:21 am to LSBoosie
quote:
Oh really because the official that had same view as that picture marked it as a first down?
Again, cool. One official marked it past and one marked it short. Then they reviewed the spot and still came up with it being short.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:22 am to LSBoosie
quote:
When you start saying stuff like this instead of addressing actual things that you said earlier in the thread it’s a bad look.
You’re the one that started throwing out personal attacks.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:23 am to RB10
We know what happened. I’m asking you how you know for 100% certainty that in that picture in which you can see the ball, that it is not past the line.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 9:31 am to LSBoosie
quote:
We know what happened. I’m asking you how you know for 100% certainty that in that picture in which you can see the ball, that it is not past the line.
Holy fricking shite bro.
I’ve said MULTIPLE TIMES that the whole point is no one knows for certain where the ball is. No me, not you, not the refs. NO ONE.
I don’t think he got the line to gain. Other people ITT don’t think he got it. Millions of people around the country don’t think he got it. You do think he got it. Other people ITT think he did get it. Millions of people around believe he got it. This would be why it’s controversial.
My entire fricking argument is that they marked him short and because no one can say with certainty that the ball was past the line to gain, that the call stood.
For frick sakes man. The only person in this argument trying to say something is certain is you.
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News