- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:38 am to RB10
quote:
Either way, bad call for sure. Worst one of the game IMO.
There’s no way to know for certain. You can’t tell if there is possession from the video. You saying this is is for sure a bad call is the same as me saying the 4th down was for sure a bad call.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:40 am to LSBoosie
quote:
There’s no way to know for certain. You can’t tell if there is possession from the video. You saying this is is for sure a bad call is the same as me saying the 4th down was for sure a bad call.
You’re allowed to say it was a bad call. I haven’t once said your opinion that it was a first is wrong or that you have no argument.
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 10:44 am
Posted on 1/27/25 at 10:54 am to AtlantaLSUfan
For those that may know, have they ever looked into a laser of some sort in the ball that can show exactly where the ball got to for plays like this and goal line situations?
Seems like an easy fix to me if the technology exists, which I’m sure it does.
Seems silly and archaic that everyone including refs have to do the impossible and effectively “guess” exactly where the ball got to.
Seems like an easy fix to me if the technology exists, which I’m sure it does.
Seems silly and archaic that everyone including refs have to do the impossible and effectively “guess” exactly where the ball got to.
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 10:58 am
Posted on 1/27/25 at 11:01 am to JPLSU1981
This was something Romo brought up then poof forgotten about
Chiefs were egregiously lining up in the neutral zone
Chiefs were egregiously lining up in the neutral zone
Posted on 1/27/25 at 11:07 am to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
Straight nonsense, neither player fully possessed a ball that touched the ground. It was an incomplete pass.
How did neither player have possession? You don’t have to have two hands on the ball to “possess” the ball.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 11:08 am to LSBoosie
Boosie, your screenshot is at a angle. Its not as definitive as you think it is. Look at the line at the bottom. It clearly can make the ball look further right than it really is at that angle.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 11:20 am to lsupride87
One thing that can't be ignored is how Dalton Kincaid was involved on all of the big plays that went against the Bills.
#1, didn't catch the 4th down pass that was catchable.
#2, didn't reach out on the 3rd down pass that was a borderline first down as is.
#3, got folded up on the 4th down play when he was behind Josh Allen not even engaging with a defender. How do you go down in that situation and not provide any help getting the extra inches needed.
He's in Mark Andrews territory IMO for failing to deliver.
#1, didn't catch the 4th down pass that was catchable.
#2, didn't reach out on the 3rd down pass that was a borderline first down as is.
#3, got folded up on the 4th down play when he was behind Josh Allen not even engaging with a defender. How do you go down in that situation and not provide any help getting the extra inches needed.
He's in Mark Andrews territory IMO for failing to deliver.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 11:41 am to lsupride87
I agree with this…..
Posted on 1/27/25 at 12:02 pm to Rabbs and QStick
Is this better?
Posted on 1/27/25 at 12:26 pm to LSBoosie
If RB10 doesn’t respond to this he is a fraud
Posted on 1/27/25 at 12:31 pm to LSBoosie
The true believers are either going to ignore that or call you a pussy
Posted on 1/27/25 at 12:52 pm to lsupride87
Looks like he’s across the 40 there, but not by much. Picture is also at an angle.
What was the actual line to gain? It’s not just “the 40 yard line”. If it the 39.5, he’s still short.
Once again, you’re posting a picture that doesn’t really show anything.
What was the actual line to gain? It’s not just “the 40 yard line”. If it the 39.5, he’s still short.
Once again, you’re posting a picture that doesn’t really show anything.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 12:56 pm to RB10
quote:
What was the actual line to gain? It’s not just “the 40 yard line”. If it the 39.5, he’s still short.
closer to 40.5 if anything.
play before
Posted on 1/27/25 at 1:00 pm to RB10
quote:
Looks like he’s across the 40 there
quote:
Once again, you’re posting a picture that doesn’t really show anything.
Incredible
Posted on 1/27/25 at 1:02 pm to RB10
quote:
hat picture doesn’t tell me he got it
Is the ball in his right or left arm? You can’t tell? Neither can I.
And as we've been told ad nauseum, the line on t.v. is not necessarily where the actual line to gain is.
Posted on 1/27/25 at 1:03 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Incredible
Not really. It’s actually pretty simple.
Angles skew things. The shot from straight down the LOS shows Allen’s head barely got to the 40. Maybe just barely past it. That shot from above shows his head is almost a half yard past it, because it’s angled from behind.
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 1/27/25 at 1:05 pm to RB10
The other indefensible thing is the nfl has and is allowed to merge two different angles with time stamps
You can see below. At the time Allen is even with the chiefs player head across the line to gain the overhead image shows the ball is past his forearm
It’s clear man, just admit it
Will be interesting for you to try and wiggle out of this. The merged pictures make it DEFINITIVE
You can see below. At the time Allen is even with the chiefs player head across the line to gain the overhead image shows the ball is past his forearm
It’s clear man, just admit it
Will be interesting for you to try and wiggle out of this. The merged pictures make it DEFINITIVE
This post was edited on 1/27/25 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 1/27/25 at 1:07 pm to lsupride87
quote:
It’s clear man, just admit it
Posted on 1/27/25 at 1:08 pm to RB10
Is the ball even with Allen’s helmet on the overhead view? Does the sideline view show his helmet across the line to gain?
Try and be honest
Try and be honest
Page 10 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News