- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 30 for 30: Trojan War - anyone else find it pretty terrible?
Posted on 10/14/15 at 12:14 pm to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 10/14/15 at 12:14 pm to RLDSC FAN
SC was the better team in 03 IMO. I am amazed how OU got into that game losing so late, but at the time and formula set up, SC got left out due to a game that was played vs 2 teams they did not even play. It sent them to Pasadena and LSU to New Orleans.
I am glad LSU won the NC, but at the time it was strange.
I am glad LSU won the NC, but at the time it was strange.
1
Posted on 10/14/15 at 12:15 pm to lsutigers1992
quote:
I remember everyone thinking that the Texans were out of their freaking mind because they had the audacity to pick Mario Williams #1 over him.
and VY. There were, however, a small minority that defended the Texans pick at the time.
Posted on 10/14/15 at 12:21 pm to sms151t
quote:
SC was the better team in 03 IMO
I don't agree here... LSU'S "D " could have shut down USC's offense just like they did OU'S......
Posted on 10/14/15 at 12:25 pm to slackster
They tried their best to trash Reggie and hype lendale and leinart.
Posted on 10/14/15 at 12:52 pm to slackster
There should be at least a 20 year period before they start making docs about it. No point in learning about something I remember living through.
Better 30-for-30 would be about the 1966 season, or Penn State only losing 6 games in 6 years and coming away with zero championships (and the Nixon influence in it all)
Better 30-for-30 would be about the 1966 season, or Penn State only losing 6 games in 6 years and coming away with zero championships (and the Nixon influence in it all)
Posted on 10/14/15 at 12:54 pm to slackster
All the 30 for 30 I've been have been pretty bad. Granted I've only seen about a dozen, but they are not entertaining to me. Plus i hate Tom Ranoldi's voice.
Posted on 10/14/15 at 1:02 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:I don't know why they claim 15. It should be 16, damn you 1966.
I do and it was a joke, relax. Bama counts 15, imo it should be 9 or 10, which is still the most which begs the question, why does Bama feel the need to count 15. Though in 1978 you lost to USC in Bham and still split the title with them.
Posted on 10/14/15 at 1:09 pm to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
Plus i hate Tom Ranoldi's voice.
Posted on 10/14/15 at 1:35 pm to HarrisLetsRide
quote:
But they were seldom tested, the Pac 10 was a complete joke then.
I remember it often being called the "PAC-1" due to how far and away So.Cal was above the rest of the conference.
Posted on 10/14/15 at 8:11 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
The Patriots were the best team in 2008
I hate to be "that guy", but it was actually the 2007 Pats that went 16-0. The 2008 Pats went 11-5, lost Brady in the first game and had to start Cassel, and didn't make the playoffs.
Posted on 10/14/15 at 8:18 pm to LooseCannon22282
quote:This was the best I've seen. Trojan War would've been better if Bush would've agreed to be in it.
The Pony Excess...
Posted on 10/14/15 at 8:21 pm to ReauxlTide222
The most ridiculous was 73. Lost to ND in the Sugar Bowl but UPI did their final ranking before the Bowl. Nobody in Crimson left Tulane Stadium feeling like they were the NC that night.
Posted on 10/14/15 at 8:22 pm to dukke v
You're not really comparing OUs offense to USC? OU scored only 7 points against K State.
USC was clearly better than LSU. Mauck and Vincent?
USC was clearly better than LSU. Mauck and Vincent?
This post was edited on 10/14/15 at 8:24 pm
Posted on 10/14/15 at 8:31 pm to Dr Rosenrosen
Marquise Hill, Marcus Spears and Kyle Williams would've broken Leinart in half.
Posted on 10/14/15 at 8:33 pm to AbuTheMonkey
quote:
2008 SC vs. 2008 UF would have been one of those all-time match-ups. That's always the game I think of when I wish a playoff would have been around earlier.
I ran a playoff for that year on Whatifsports. Those were the two teams in the title game. Florida was up by 2 late in the game and Southern Cal was driving down the field. Joe McKnight fumbled with less than 90 seconds to go.
Posted on 10/14/15 at 8:34 pm to Cincinnati Bowtie
Sure they would have. Leinart only won 34 games in a row. He wouldn't have stood a chance.
Posted on 10/14/15 at 8:50 pm to slackster
Yes.
Posted on 10/14/15 at 9:24 pm to Dr Rosenrosen
How exactly were the Trojans clearly better?
Posted on 10/14/15 at 9:27 pm to maringer11
34. Wins. In. A. Row. 34!!!!!!
USC's exclusion from the BCS title game in 2003 is the most ridiculous outcome in the history of college football.
USC's exclusion from the BCS title game in 2003 is the most ridiculous outcome in the history of college football.
This post was edited on 10/14/15 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 10/14/15 at 9:28 pm to Dr Rosenrosen
Good explanation you are really good at this.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News