Started By
Message

re: 3 timeouts and you try a 64 yd FG?

Posted on 9/13/22 at 9:05 am to
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Using the kicking stats I posted its almost exactly the same. Roughly 20%.


This is just flat out wrong lol. You’re using a number that looks at 60+ not 64.

quote:

Nfl teams are 2/42 on attempts of 64 yards or more
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108112 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 9:10 am to
Mingo how is the math you freaking idiot

quote:

Aaron Schatz, a pioneer in NFL advanced stats and the creator of Football Outsiders, described Hackett electing to kick a field goal as “a flabbergasting decision.” Schatz’s win-probability model suggests that with 20 seconds to go the Broncos had a 36.1% chance of victory by going for it on 4th-and-5 compared to only 7.4% by attempting the field goal.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40158 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 9:19 am to
Yea I didn't even factor in the fact that seattle would still have about 13-15 seconds and two timeouts even if McManus made the kick.

So kicking there (being the most generous to denver on probabilities) is even worse than I initially thought.


There's really no universe that kicking there makes sense.
This post was edited on 9/13/22 at 9:19 am
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
58405 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 9:20 am to
Coach would rather put it in the kickers hands for 64 yards than in Wilsons hands in crunch time
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
6803 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 9:22 am to
quote:

The facts are, once you don't take the timeout immediately, kicking the field goal and going for it likely have about the same EPA.


No, the fact that he didnt take the timeout says he thought making a 64 yard field goal was better odds than running another play and using his remaining timeouts to gain more yards, which is asinine. Once he decides to let the clock run he literally has no other option other than a hailmary
This post was edited on 9/13/22 at 9:23 am
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
6803 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 9:26 am to
quote:

Schatz’s win-probability model suggests that with 20 seconds to go the Broncos had a 36.1% chance of victory by going for it on 4th-and-5 compared to only 7.4% by attempting the field goal.



lmfao so 5x as likely to win if they go for it but dingo is in here telling us were all retarded
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 6:08 pm to
Lol. Radio just said Russel Wilson has converted 56% of his 4th down conversions between 4-6 yds.

Posted by GoldenGuy
Member since Oct 2015
12729 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

Even if you just think about what play has a higher likelihood for success. I think five yards is easier.


The team has a 47% chance of making the 4th down.

64 yard FG? 4%
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53551 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

go the Broncos had a 36.1% chance of victory by going for it on 4th-and-5 compared to only 7.4% by attempting the field goal.


Coach is probably thinking that all they had to do was kick a field goal, as opposed to make the 5 yards, and then try a slightly easier field goal
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 7:35 pm to
64 is almost impossible if you go off stays.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
61857 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

Nfl teams are 2/42 on attempts of 64 yards or more



I understand.

I also see kicks that are 50+ that would be good from 65 on a weekly basis now.

Kicking isn't what it used to be. Go look at Cade York's FG to win this weekend. It would have been good from 65 no problem.

If you think the current FG% is anywhere near 2 in 42, you simply haven't been paying attention.

Having said that, I'm not saying that the decision was a good one. I would have gone for it.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35751 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

lmfao so 5x as likely to win if they go for it but dingo is in here telling us were all retarded


Keep in mind that win likelihood probably goes up significantly if they don’t let 40 seconds bleed away before attempting their fourth down play.
This post was edited on 9/13/22 at 11:16 pm
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35751 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

If you think the current FG% is anywhere near 2 in 42, you simply haven't been paying attention.


Yeah, it’s now lower by a bit.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

why you don't go for it and get the first down.


if you don't make first down you lose.

if you make the kick you win.

it made the distance.
wide left a couple feet.

I only saw it live.
looked close

Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 1:01 am to
What were they gonna talk about? He wanted to kick

Wilson fricked up all night
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
38365 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 5:01 am to
just checking in to say I understand math and would have deep-fried a football and eaten it before I did what Hackett did on Monday night

Kicking there is damn near inexcusable.

Some of the posts in this thread advocating the FG as a statistical toss-up are eye-crossingly bad
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
78956 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 5:23 am to
quote:

Lol, no clue why you don't go for it and get the first down.


Dumber part was draining the clock. If you think you have a better chance of making the FG than the 4th and 5, kicking is the right call.

But do it right away and use the timeouts to get the ball back.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Kicking there is damn near inexcusable.

Some of the posts in this thread advocating the FG as a statistical toss-up are eye-crossingly bad


watch the video .
ball is long and high enough. wide left. 5 feet.

we saw a wide left from 36 yards this week.


Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
24944 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 10:42 am to
quote:

if you don't make first down you lose.

if you make the kick you win.

it made the distance.
wide left a couple feet.

I only saw it live.
looked close



none of this changes the statistical stupidity of Hackett's decision.


oh, and the kick missed. so it doesn't matter how far it went
Posted by TackySweater
Member since Dec 2020
24650 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 10:44 am to
quote:

is long and high enough. wide left. 5 feet.


Right. It’s damn near impossible to make that. Which is why the odds are so low. Just because it looks like he almost made it doesn’t mean the odds are high.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram