Started By
Message

Yahoo "people are turning towards ARMs for home loans" highest since 2008

Posted on 5/18/22 at 3:46 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55850 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 3:46 pm
That sounds familiar!




quote:

The share of ARMs made up 10.8% of overall loans last week, according to MBA, the highest point since March 2008 and more than doubling the 4.4% of purchase application activity for the week ending January 27.






LINK
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
41067 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 3:49 pm to
I probably should have done an ARM a couple of times.
Posted by PotatoChip
Member since May 2014
5392 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 3:49 pm to
I’ll be getting a 10 year arm when I close on my loan in a few months.
This post was edited on 5/18/22 at 3:50 pm
Posted by Sterling Archer
Member since Aug 2012
8504 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 3:51 pm to
I think the main difference is lenders have stricter lending requirements now. So theoretically, borrowers should be able to manage those rate changes.

eta: I have a home that should be complete in November. I'm definitely going to consider an ARM
This post was edited on 5/18/22 at 3:52 pm
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
17195 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 4:12 pm to
These things were big in the 80’s and early 90’s

They make sense for a lot of folks . First time home buyers who generally only hold onto a house for a few years could benefit most.

Investment property is another area that it can make sense
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
52236 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

"people are turning towards ARMs for home loans" highest since 2008

Have people not learned a single damn thing?! They're gonna be the first ones to start bitching about wanting help with their mortgage payments when their rates start to skyrocket.
Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21089 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 6:37 pm to
well....technically an ARM can go DOWN depending on the product and of course your long-term projection of interest rates

OR

refinance baby!

same playbook - new era
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6541 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

eta: I have a home that should be complete in November. I'm definitely going to consider an ARM



same boat but a couple months ahead of ya.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
86152 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 6:39 pm to
I did an 10yr in my last home bc I knew I’d refinance or sell before 10yrs.

Been looking for last 2 months and asked the lender about ARM right now and she said she isn’t seeing much lower than normal rate at this point. I haven’t looked.
Posted by AUjim
America
Member since Dec 2012
3835 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 7:09 pm to
And now people chime in with how it makes sense for them

EXCEPT for it absolutely doesnt because they wont be able to refinance or sell their house that they owe 370k on that is only worth 340k.
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6541 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

And now people chime in with how it makes sense for them

EXCEPT for it absolutely doesnt because they wont be able to refinance or sell their house that they owe 370k on that is only worth 340k.



meh blanket advice is trash and is not always correct. it does make sense for some...like those who will be selling before the rates adjust.

or for others like newly minted doctors/dentists with less income now but will have huge income growth in a few years.

ARM = bad
debt = bad
blanket advice that doesn't apply to everyone.
Posted by Billy Blanks
Member since Dec 2021
5232 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 8:17 pm to
I have 5 rentals. 3 on 30 year fixed. 2 on 5 year ARM's
Posted by Jag_Warrior
Virginia
Member since May 2015
4292 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

They make sense for a lot of folks . First time home buyers who generally only hold onto a house for a few years could benefit most.


Yes, especially if the caps work with their projected timeline for being in the home. A 3-5 yr. ARM might be appropriate for a lot of people. With a so-called “forever” home, probably not. But for those who don’t plan on being in the home for 15-30 years… it’s a sensible option (depending on pricing and terms).
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37756 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

The share of ARMs made up 10.8% of overall loans last week,


Still need more information to gauge how risky this is. If these are mostly 10 years that's a different risk than mostly five or fewer years.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35407 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 8:46 pm to
People want to compare it to 2008, but the issues then but a lot of the problematic ARMs were nothing like the current ones with initial short-term teaser rates and/or interest rates, balloon payments, etc. Furthermore, the lending requirements were much more lax and people, and far lower equity and far higher LTV ratios. Finally, they were building a lot more housing, so prices did not reflect the proper supply and demand equilibrium.

Now, there is a housing shortage (4 million homes) so prices are more reflective of the true supply and demand equilibrium, the lending standards are stricter, people have much more equity in their homes with far lower LTV ratios, AND those problematic ARMs are non-existent.

Most ARM nowadays are locked in for 5, 7, or 10 years, with caps on adjustments when they do switch to adjustable rates. So not only are those more in line with typical mortgage duration (even 30-year mortgages since people either refinance or move), it’s unlikely that there won’t be an opportunity to refinance at a similar or lower rate in 5-10 years. People will also have had a pretty significant amount extra in lower payments with a lower rate, built a significant amount of equity even if prices don’t rise (highly unlikely), and incomes typically increase a significant amount in 5-10 years especially since rates are correlated with wage growth, and a lot of first time homeowners are entering that high wage growth stage of their careers.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35407 posts
Posted on 5/18/22 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

Still need more information to gauge how risky this is. If these are mostly 10 years that's a different risk than mostly five or fewer years.
Something interesting to look at are the interest rates and the APR differences. For a fixed mortgage, the APR can never be lower than the interest rate, but is almost always higher because of closing costs are calculated.

On the other hand, from my understanding banks calculate APR under the assumption that the borrower will hold it to maturity (30 years) for ARMs and then make a projection for future rates to determine APR.

So if they project rates to be lower for the remaining 20-25 years, then unlike fixed rate mortgages, the projected APR can be lower than the initial locked in rate. And right now from what I can see, all 5-10 year ARMs have a lower APR so the banks are projecting the rates to decrease after switch to adjustable rates.

Now I don’t know if those projections ever show a higher APR, but I would imagine that is more likely the case when rates can’t go much lower, and the ARM-fixed spread is much lower. That said, since rates are rather high for the post-2008 crash, the projections are assuming they’ll revert closer to that mean. And I think those projections are most reasonable.

In other words, for a number of reasons (most of which I listed in the post above), I don’t think ARMs, are very risky, with lower risks the longer the fixed rate period is. But the banks projected APRs appear to confirm this.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41919 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 9:56 am to
quote:

I think the main difference is lenders have stricter lending requirements now. So theoretically, borrowers should be able to manage those rate changes.


For the moment.

When/if the market freezes up, you are going to see a LOT of pressure on these banks to relax standards.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41919 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Most ARM nowadays are locked in for 5, 7, or 10 years,


Right. If the boom is just starting today... it will be a while before we have any issues with ARMs.

But certainly the trend is concerning. It may work out fine. It may not.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96502 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 10:16 am to
I was in a couple of ARMs and never liked the uncertainty (and what certainty there was ended up being bad.)

I'm happy with my 2.49%, 30-year.
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
17356 posts
Posted on 5/19/22 at 10:19 am to
I did an ARM a few years ago. For a house I knew I'd be selling before the teaser rates expired.

But I don't think most people who are using ARM's are doing that. They are just hoping for the best while they over-extend themselves. On the bright side, there isn't a lot of inventory for them to buy in my area to screw up the market in 3-5 years with a bunch of foreclosures.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram