Started By
Message

re: XOM has been trying to kiss March 15 this week.

Posted on 9/30/20 at 3:53 pm to
Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
207 posts
Posted on 9/30/20 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

The oil industry and most industries have always been that way. What industry would you rather work in, automotive? steel? airline? banking? paper? anything that is manufacturing? How often do you read headlines on their layoffs?

Incidentally -
“ Prolonged closures at Disney's California-based theme parks and limited attendance at its open parks has forced the company to lay off 28,000 employees across its parks, experiences and consumer products division.”

Historically oil industry jobs and their support related sectors have some of the highest paying salaries. With only a high school diploma you can make 6 figures working in a plant. Yes there is down sizing every 15 years or so (and those are generally salaried positions), but it always comes back. In the late 1980’s and early 1990’s there were lots of small refineries and companies closing shop. By the end of the 1990’s the majors were picking up the gap and expanding. It’s cyclic. Even with more electric vehicles, it will be back.
Why will it be "back"? Why does it have to be "back"? What does "back" mean?
This post was edited on 9/30/20 at 3:54 pm
Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
207 posts
Posted on 9/30/20 at 4:03 pm to
Up until 2014 XOM made $5-10B/qtr more cash from ops than spent on capex. After 2014, coverage dropped to $0-5B/qtr, until 2019. Since then they have spent almost $0.5B more on capex than generated from operations, per quarter. And that is before dividends.

Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
207 posts
Posted on 9/30/20 at 4:04 pm to
XOM has dogmatically stuck to its history of raising dividends annually despite marked deterioration in underlying fundamentals. Dividends now costing over $3.5B per qtr. After dividends, until 2014, generated $3-$4B excess cash per qtr. Since then, average negative $2B per quarter. Almost negative $4B/qtr since 2019
Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
207 posts
Posted on 9/30/20 at 4:05 pm to
So what have they done? Sell assets and add debt, swinging XOM's balance sheet from essentially no debt (after cash) to over $50B. Production has dropped from almost 5 mmboe/d to 4 mmboe/d. What can they do? The market has clearly sniffed out that the dividend is not sustainable. Yield is now over 10%. It’s reminiscent of $COP in 2016. Dividend was not sustainable & market knew it. COP cut it from 74c to 25c in 1Q16. XOM in a different position though, almost unique in the market; certainly unique within energy. On 2Q20 earnings call, they reported that “something like 70% of our shareholder base is retail investors”

Simplest course of action, keep selling assets where they can and backfill cash flow needs by continuing to add more and more debt at remarkably low rates. Hope commodity prices improve drastically, which is not much of a strategy. Hard to see how they improve their position absent a dramatic increase in commodity prices, for which is an environment in which there are far better stocks to own
Posted by Triple Bogey
19th Green
Member since May 2017
5985 posts
Posted on 9/30/20 at 4:42 pm to
As a shareholder, I wish XOM would get focused on the future. It's hard to want to invest your money in dinosaurs where you know demand won't be in the next decade. Every automaker in the world (not just tesla) is making a conscience switch to electric.

Paying large dividends and not changing/adapting is a bad strategy. Retail investors care about growth and the future.
Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
1754 posts
Posted on 9/30/20 at 7:12 pm to
For a shareholder, you really disagree with some fundamental beliefs they have. Have you read their energy outlooks the last couple of years?
This post was edited on 9/30/20 at 7:14 pm
Posted by Triple Bogey
19th Green
Member since May 2017
5985 posts
Posted on 9/30/20 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

Have you read their energy outlooks the last couple of years?


No, I inherited 100 shares, but liked the dividend so I never tried to sell. You gotta link?
Posted by Ramblin Wreck
Member since Aug 2011
3898 posts
Posted on 9/30/20 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

Why will it be "back"? Why does it have to be "back"? What does "back" mean?


I’m not an expert, but my gut feeling is -

- just like the 80’s and early 90’s, small producers will go under, shut down smaller / older refineries, won’t be able to borrow to drill

- populations in third world will continue to increase along with a demand for energy

- state governments will realize more electric cars mean more of a demand on electrical infrastructures and results in huge reductions in gasoline taxes for road maintenance , thus will reduce regulations and purchase tax incentives for purchase (Note recent article posted on OT about Volvo study showed an electric version of the XC40 needs to surpass 115,000 miles before the CO2 associated with production and usage starts becoming less than the gasoline version)

- the virus impact will go away

- oil companies will tighten their belts and make smarter decisions

- new product slates will be developed

Will oil go back to $100 per barrel? I doubt it. Will they be profitable companies capable of paying good dividends and growth? Yes

Just my opinion.

Posted by jimjackandjose
Member since Jun 2011
6496 posts
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:03 pm to
And plastic isnt going anywhere
Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
1754 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 10:07 am to
Google “ExxonMobil outlook for energy.” There’s a pdf that should come up.
Posted by Lee Chatelain
I love the OT!
Member since Oct 2008
11343 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 10:19 am to
I’ve lost all gains since I bought in in March. Man this is gonna be a long long long hold
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58131 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 10:25 am to
Oil is down pretty big today for some reason
Posted by cmlsu
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Aug 2011
659 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 11:11 am to
I unloaded my XOM at a loss a little while back mainly because of the opportunity cost. Not because I don’t think XOM will bounce back. But it’s not going to rebound soon.

My money can grow elsewhere making up for the loss and then some and I’ll readdress buying back into XOM at that point. I feel this price point for XOM will still be around months from now.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27824 posts
Posted on 10/2/20 at 6:31 am to
Not sure if anyone saw their filing for investors yesterday giving a update on expected impacts to 3Q earnings

LINK

Improvements on the upstream side which shows they're likely breaking even in that segment at current prices. Downstream margins are even worse which I guess is to be expected with supply trailing demand decline. It will be interesting to see if they provide detail on the margins in July vs September to see if they're improving.

So another quarter of negative cash flow. It will be interesting to see if this causes a change in direct with dividends. They need to be earning about $6-7B each quarter to sustain dividends and minimal capital spend. So about half their cash is going to be gone this quarter. You have to assume the refining margins are improving or they would already be signaling a cut in the dividend.
Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
207 posts
Posted on 10/2/20 at 9:05 am to
Refining margins are hardly improving. U.S. refiners are down an average ~25% over the past month. They are sick. The oil market is sick. And the demand recovery has seemingly hit a lull. More pain ahead.
Posted by donRANDOMnumbers
Hub City
Member since Nov 2006
16908 posts
Posted on 10/2/20 at 9:20 am to
i dumped every O&G position i have. not becuase i think it could find success in the future, but because your money is better off somewhere else.
Posted by jimjackandjose
Member since Jun 2011
6496 posts
Posted on 10/2/20 at 9:50 am to
Some chemical margins are up. Mostly based on supply not coming online that was expected
Posted by GoldenGuy
Member since Oct 2015
10880 posts
Posted on 10/2/20 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Specifically their oil sands operations Canada are going to be their downfall. As always, blame Canada.


An oil sands operation anywhere else in the world would have the same problems; shut it off and it's gone forever.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
48543 posts
Posted on 10/2/20 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

i dumped every O&G position i have. not becuase i think it could find success in the future, but because your money is better off somewhere else.

I have too over the past few years other than one small spec play. It's been dead money for too long.
Posted by Jag_Warrior
Virginia
Member since May 2015
4099 posts
Posted on 10/2/20 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

And plastic isnt going anywhere


Possibly a good reason to buy NDSN, but not sure it provides a buy side case for XOM.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram