Started By
Message

re: Who in here follows the "FIRE" mindset when it comes to money?

Posted on 6/20/24 at 3:59 pm to
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
36458 posts
Posted on 6/20/24 at 3:59 pm to
Thought about that. But he makes the point early on that rich people are actually some of the worst at this mindset. They miss out on experiences by working too much for too long for no real reason.
Posted by Lawyers_Guns_Money
Member since Apr 2015
434 posts
Posted on 6/20/24 at 4:09 pm to
I read "Die With Zero" and consider it often.

It sounds great in theory, but it's hard to execute to. Especially when your brain always wants more.

I have more money than I ever expected to have at this point in my life, but I still struggle to actually spend any of it. One of my honest worries is being 80 years old with $15m in the bank, wishing I had enjoyed it more.
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24738 posts
Posted on 6/20/24 at 5:10 pm to
If I die with a bunch of money then so be it. I don’t want to have regrets on missing experiences or helping my kids when the money is actually useful to them.

$50K means way more to a 20 year old than it does to a 65 year old.
Posted by RoyalWe
Prairieville, LA
Member since Mar 2018
3765 posts
Posted on 6/20/24 at 5:14 pm to
quote:


If I die with a bunch of money then so be it.
Yeah, this is where I am too. I'd rather have too much than not enough, and my kids will use the excess. I also plan on giving my kids gifts once I retire to help them along the way. I never had that, and it would have been extremely helpful.

I think I'm pretty much good to go, but my wife is very conservative and wants to pad the figures, so I'll work until 55 unless I get downsized.
Posted by Lawyers_Guns_Money
Member since Apr 2015
434 posts
Posted on 6/20/24 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

If I die with a bunch of money then so be it. I don’t want to have regrets on missing experiences or helping my kids when the money is actually useful to them. $50K means way more to a 20 year old than it does to a 65 year old.


I agree with you a million percent, but my challenge is actually executing and spending the money.
This post was edited on 7/3/24 at 12:38 pm
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
36458 posts
Posted on 6/20/24 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

Yeah, this is where I am too. I'd rather have too much than not enough, and my kids will use the excess. I also plan on giving my kids gifts once I retire to help them along the way. I never had that, and it would have been extremely helpful. I think I'm pretty much good to go, but my wife is very conservative and wants to pad the figures, so I'll work until 55 unless I get downsized.


You think she would read the book and see if it changes her mind? Stop waiting and padding and start stacking experiences before it’s too late. Do extra experiences with your kids now.

You see story the other day about Michael Irvin’s wife having early onset dementia at age 58? Mental health, physical health, random freak accidents all in play. Not worth waiting
This post was edited on 6/20/24 at 5:30 pm
Posted by RT1980
Member since Sep 2020
203 posts
Posted on 6/20/24 at 10:05 pm to
I'm at the point where I can't RE but starting to make larger decisions than I previously was able to. Looking to uproot from my hometown as a SINK at 32 and make a life change. Taking careful considerations but even being on this path has at least given me the opportunity to consider it.

I do travel a decent amount, at least comparatively to people in know, but need to work on not hoarding as much and do more things I want to
Posted by RoyalWe
Prairieville, LA
Member since Mar 2018
3765 posts
Posted on 6/21/24 at 7:58 am to
quote:

You think she would read the book and see if it changes her mind?
No, but I'm trying.

There are good reasons to work until 55. The primary one being I can take advantage of the Rule of 55 with my 401k to avoid paying penalties. There's a part of me that says it would be worth paying it to stop working.

I get that they want to discourage people from withdrawing money from their 401k "early", but seems like they should allow those of us north of 50 on our way to 8 figures to retire without penalty. I think I got it covered, Uncle Sam.

quote:

You see story the other day about Michael Irvin’s wife having early onset dementia at age 58?
No, but I tell her often that there are no guarantees in life. I had an uncle die of cancer six months after he retired. There are plenty of examples to point to, but I think she's just on that treadmill and is working out of habit and due to the American psyche of productivity = moral goodness.
Posted by LSUSports247
Member since Apr 2007
862 posts
Posted on 6/21/24 at 8:23 am to
What rate of return do y’all use when do retirement projections? I’ve been using 7%, is that a good conservative number?

My five year rate of return is 16% in my 401k account. That includes a horrible 2022.

16% greatly changes the numbers
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
38718 posts
Posted on 6/21/24 at 8:27 am to
I use 7%. It's conservative, but not overly so imo.

7% is right around the historical real rate of return so it's a good number to have as a baseline.

Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
2121 posts
Posted on 6/21/24 at 9:27 am to
SWR assumption has a big impact on the prediction, too.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
30294 posts
Posted on 6/21/24 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Dave is extra retarded 
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
30294 posts
Posted on 6/21/24 at 9:52 am to
SWR is a moving target. FYI the academics that study retirement income planning use 6% for rate of return.
Posted by Lawyers_Guns_Money
Member since Apr 2015
434 posts
Posted on 6/21/24 at 10:20 am to
Here are my dumb questions regarding FIRE:

1) Do I count 401k/Roth IRA as liquid, since technically I can access that if I need to?
2) How do you consider Tax on withdrawals?
3) Is it as simple as multiplying assets (non-RE) by the SWR (4%, 6%, whatever) and if you can survive off of that, you can technically FIRE?
This post was edited on 7/3/24 at 12:39 pm
Posted by RoyalWe
Prairieville, LA
Member since Mar 2018
3765 posts
Posted on 6/21/24 at 10:36 am to
quote:

1) Do I count 401k/Roth IRA as liquid, since technically I can access that if I need to?
Yes. I've never seen this not be counted.

quote:

2) How do you consider Tax on withdrawals?
As you know, taxes can be very complicated or simple. If yours are simple, then you'd do it normally. If you have after-tax withdrawals then no impact. If you're withdrawing from traditional 401k or IRA, then the distribution counts as income. Look up the tax brackets and do the math. It's not hard.

quote:

3) Is it as simple as multiplying assets (non-RE) by the SWR (4%, 6%, whatever) and if you can survive off of that, you can technically FIRE?
There are 1,000 FIRE calculators, but back-of-the-envelope is divide your annual pre-tax needed distribution by 0.04.

EDIT: Compare that with your total amount saved (liquid). If you have that much, then you're "pretty much there." At least that's what I've read...
This post was edited on 6/21/24 at 10:38 am
Posted by Lawyers_Guns_Money
Member since Apr 2015
434 posts
Posted on 6/21/24 at 10:48 am to
Thanks!

Good news - I am basically there.

Bad news - I am not actually gonna retire anytime soon
Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
2297 posts
Posted on 6/22/24 at 6:51 am to
I’m planning for 55 (11 yrs out) and using the Rule of 55 to withdraw before 59.5

I’ll also have taxable account but not considering that in any retirement calculations.

Health insurance will be a wild card when I get to 55.
____________

Why are you excluding taxable? It is a big part of my retirement.

Wife and I are both healthy and not old enough for medicare. We pay about $2k per month in premiums for health insurance. We also have $7k deductible each. You definitely want to plan for insurance costs if retiring early.
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24738 posts
Posted on 6/22/24 at 10:10 am to
7% and and 3% withdrawal rate

ETA: I’m conservative in planning. It also simplifies the planning as sequence of return risk is prominent so these more conservative measures can accommodate SOR nuances without me needing to run more complex models.
This post was edited on 6/22/24 at 12:33 pm
Posted by bigtig
Member since Aug 2005
911 posts
Posted on 6/30/24 at 4:30 am to
People getting out of the game at 40. You must be making a hell of a lot of money. Also what do you plan on doing. I for one can tell you that after one to two years of retirement it can get boring as hell. 40 is way to young to call it in . No matter how much money you have. I got out at 62 and I would go back to work in a heart beat. I do stay active helping my kids and doing things for others. And if you want to know I have more money than I need and give to my kids every year.
Posted by Lawyers_Guns_Money
Member since Apr 2015
434 posts
Posted on 6/30/24 at 7:04 am to
quote:

People getting out of the game at 40. You must be making a hell of a lot of money. Also what do you plan on doing. I for one can tell you that after one to two years of retirement it can get boring as hell. 40 is way to young to call it in . No matter how much money you have. I got out at 62 and I would go back to work in a heart beat. I do stay active helping my kids and doing things for others. And if you want to know I have more money than I need and give to my kids every year.


I don’t plan on retiring at 40, but I do plan on leaving the corporate world. I’ll always have some form of work (start a company, investing, etc), just need to figure out what that looks like.
This post was edited on 7/3/24 at 12:39 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram