Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Texas Court Issues Temporary Injunction Nationwide on BOI Reporting Requirements

Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:00 am
Posted by ApisMellifera
SWLA
Member since Apr 2023
767 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 10:00 am
quote:

On December 3, 2024, a Texas-based federal court issued a sweeping order prohibiting the federal government from enforcing the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) anywhere in the country. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, et al., Case No. 4:24-cv-478 (E.D. Tex.). The Court held that the CTA—which would have required an estimated 32.5 million companies in the United States as of January 1, 2024, to submit sensitive information regarding their “beneficial owners” (BOI) to the United States Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) by January 1, 2025—was likely unconstitutional and that its implementation would irreparably harm reporting companies if they were forced to comply. The Court enjoined the CTA’s enforcement nationwide, specifically stating that neither the Act nor its related regulations may be enforced, and that “reporting companies need not comply with the CTA’s January 1, 2025, BOI reporting deadline[.]”


quote:

Unlike other court decisions that have examined the CTA’s constitutionality, Texas Top Cop Shop explicitly enjoined the CTA nationwide, finding that “[a] nationwide injunction is appropriate in this case.” This means that “[existing] reporting companies need not comply with the CTA’s January 1, 2025, BOI reporting deadline,” and that FinCEN cannot enforce any of the CTA’s penalties for willful noncompliance against entities or individuals.


quote:

The Court’s decision will likely not be the final word on the CTA’s enforceability. To begin, the Court entered only a preliminary injunction, which it could theoretically reconsider at some point in the future. The more likely next step, however, is that the government will immediately appeal this decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. A further appeal could be taken to the United States Supreme Court. But unless a court specifically dissolves the Texas Top Cop Shop injunction, companies will not be required to comply with the CTA’s reporting requirements.


The National Law Review
Posted by GeauxTigers123
Member since Feb 2007
3661 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 1:27 pm to
The $500 dollar per day fine seems absurd.
Posted by LEASTBAY
Member since Aug 2007
16553 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 2:17 pm to
Everyone's CPAs sending out emails scaring their clients about fines and offering to do this for their clients for $250-$500. I had a feeling it would be blocked.
Posted by ApisMellifera
SWLA
Member since Apr 2023
767 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Everyone's CPAs sending out emails scaring their clients about fines




So CPAs shouldn't warn their clients about the potential consequences of non-compliance?
Posted by LEASTBAY
Member since Aug 2007
16553 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 2:47 pm to
Maybe but I haven't heard about this elsewhere, only from people asking for money to file it.
Posted by Larry Gooseman
Houston
Member since Mar 2014
2788 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 2:57 pm to
Ours asked for $1,000!

I looked at it and it is maximum 20 minutes to complete the form if you have your partners information handy.
Posted by ApisMellifera
SWLA
Member since Apr 2023
767 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:05 pm to
We sent out emails to all clients earlier in the year letting them know about it. We would be a crappy firm if we didn't. We would also get hell from those clients if they received a notice in the mail about penalties for failure to file and we had never mentioned anything.

I also bring it up to clients while in a meeting or on the phone. I tell them the process is very simple and I can send them a link that takes them to the website to do it themselves. About 90% of the time, I get "Nah, I'll just pay you to fool with that."

We are busy enough without this simple compliance nonsense.
Posted by LEASTBAY
Member since Aug 2007
16553 posts
Posted on 12/4/24 at 3:22 pm to
I agree with firms doing this but did the government ever send a notice of some sort? Maybe I just missed it.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
40997 posts
Posted on 12/5/24 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Everyone's CPAs sending out emails scaring their clients about fines and offering to do this for their clients for $250-$500. I had a feeling it would be blocked.


There is not a single CPA I know that wants to do these filings. Yes they are relatively easy but this is the time of year for planning and taking sone time off. That’s one reason they are charging so much.

Other attempts to shoot this down have failed, so this likely to end up at the USSC.
Posted by ApexHunterNetcode
Member since Aug 2023
601 posts
Posted on 12/5/24 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

this likely to end up at the USSC.


I'm surprised it hasn't made it there already.
Posted by Duzz
Houston
Member since Feb 2008
10219 posts
Posted on 12/5/24 at 8:26 pm to
So what happen in the worst case scenario that the USSC allowed FinCen to indeed make BIOR happen? does that mean everyone that didn't register after the injunction would be automatically hit with a 10 thousand dollar fine AND 591 dollars for every day since the original deadline?

Curious about this, I was going to do it but saw this at the last minute before I did.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37536 posts
Posted on 12/5/24 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

So what happen in the worst case scenario that the USSC allowed FinCen to indeed make BIOR happen? does that mean everyone that didn't register after the injunction would be automatically hit with a 10 thousand dollar fine AND 591 dollars for every day since the original deadline? Curious about this, I was going to do it but saw this at the last minute before I did.


*THIS IS NOT TAX ADVICE*

It is my understanding that the injunction delays the form from being due therefore there will be no fine
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115220 posts
Posted on 12/5/24 at 9:01 pm to
Good.
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
47645 posts
Posted on 12/5/24 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Everyone's CPAs sending out emails scaring their clients about fines and offering to do this for their clients for $250-$500. I had a feeling it would be blocked.

You are severely mistaken if you think any CPA wants to file these.
Posted by Duzz
Houston
Member since Feb 2008
10219 posts
Posted on 12/5/24 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

It is my understanding that the injunction delays the form from being due therefore there will be no fine

'

Cool thank you, yeah i don't think BIOR falls under tax advice. it more like... paperwork advice like they trying to make BIOR like a EIN or something.
Posted by stewie
Member since Jan 2006
4030 posts
Posted on 12/5/24 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

I agree with firms doing this but did the government ever send a notice of some sort? Maybe I just missed it.


No and that’s part of the issue …
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 12/5/24 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

Maybe but I haven't heard about this elsewhere, only from people asking for money to file it.


Your ignorance of the law is irrelevant.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26427 posts
Posted on 12/5/24 at 11:10 pm to
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24187 posts
Posted on 12/6/24 at 9:40 am to
quote:


I agree with firms doing this but did the government ever send a notice of some sort? Maybe I just missed it.


You need to check your emails then, I was getting emails at least weekly for the past 2 months or so to do it.

They look somewhat scammy, like the bullshite sent from the companies that offer to do your LLC refiling for $250. But if you have an EIN I can promise you they were sent.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram