1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/21/26 at 10:13 am to NorthMan
Take this for what it's worth, a substantial amount (80-85%) of my shares were returned from loan and the rate dropped roughly half a point. Feel like they've been on loan since late Feb early March. Looks like the shorts are heading back to the basement.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 11:27 am to Rendevoustavern
This is good right?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 11:57 am to dkreller
Has anybody invested in Sparc (SPTCF)? It's cheap, and if their product with HGRAF is successful, they could be a winner.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:39 pm to dkreller
I think so. That would mean the overall short sentiment is going down. The only thing they could do would be to take the shares on loan again if the trailing EMA continues to show a downward trajectory, which it currently is, but there is a floor that they'd have to risk.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:43 pm to Jax-Tiger
Pink sheets? Now we’re talkin!
Posted on 4/21/26 at 2:45 pm to Jax-Tiger
quote:
Has anybody invested in Sparc (SPTCF)? It's cheap, and if their product with HGRAF is successful, they could be a winner.
I'm unaware of this one. I haven't been following the thread the last week or so but was it discussed?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:24 pm to DoomGuy504
I’m tempted to throw a few hundred at a 0.25 stock
Posted on 4/21/26 at 4:40 pm to dkreller
Foreign Penny Stock
Fidelity charged a fee, but I bought 500 shares.
Vertically aligning may be doubling down on a good bet. Might also be missing an opportunity to own more of the core stock. Might be missing an opportunity to diversify. Pick your poison.
Fidelity charged a fee, but I bought 500 shares.
Vertically aligning may be doubling down on a good bet. Might also be missing an opportunity to own more of the core stock. Might be missing an opportunity to diversify. Pick your poison.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 7:41 pm to Jax-Tiger
I am gonna throw $1k at it and see what happens.
If their coatings/paints are super water resistant based on graphene infusion I don’t see any reason they wouldn’t turn a profit.
4000 shares for a grand is worth a little gamble
If their coatings/paints are super water resistant based on graphene infusion I don’t see any reason they wouldn’t turn a profit.
4000 shares for a grand is worth a little gamble
Posted on 4/21/26 at 9:24 pm to masoncj
quote:
graphene infusion
That’s a f’n sexy term that I hope we hear often in the future.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 7:20 am to supadave3
Posted on 4/22/26 at 7:55 am to Jax-Tiger
DARPA is looking for proof that graphene can be produced at scale and is consistent...
Due date for said proof is June, 1st...
Due date for said proof is June, 1st...
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 7:56 am
Posted on 4/22/26 at 8:03 am to Jax-Tiger
quote:
DARPA is looking for proof that graphene can be produced at scale and is consistent...
Due date for said proof is June, 1st...
NICE!!! The way I read it, is they are asking for submittals of evidence until June 1st, then their review kicks off. I assume someone at HG is aware of this request or has been aware for some time.
I won't sale my stack until it's north of $50/share!!
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:36 am to Dock Holiday
Anyone curious as to why HGRAF has been so quiet, lately?
Other than the HQ opening, they have not said much that is aimed at investors. They have done PR events, but those seem to be more directed at potential clients and are focused on the technical benefits of HGRAF graphene.
Even the grand opening of the HQ has bin delayed until August...
Either they have nothing to announce, or they have a lot to announce, but are letting the announcements pile up in order to have a bigger impact going into NASDAQ listing.
Imagine the impact if they announce that they have 30 Hyperions under contract, a new gas contract, 10 new customer POs totaling 1500 tons to be delivered by year end, and NASDAQ listing.
I like that better than them coming out and telling us there is nothing new, but customers coming later.
Other than the HQ opening, they have not said much that is aimed at investors. They have done PR events, but those seem to be more directed at potential clients and are focused on the technical benefits of HGRAF graphene.
Even the grand opening of the HQ has bin delayed until August...
Either they have nothing to announce, or they have a lot to announce, but are letting the announcements pile up in order to have a bigger impact going into NASDAQ listing.
Imagine the impact if they announce that they have 30 Hyperions under contract, a new gas contract, 10 new customer POs totaling 1500 tons to be delivered by year end, and NASDAQ listing.
I like that better than them coming out and telling us there is nothing new, but customers coming later.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:36 am to masoncj
In for 2500 SPTCF. Hopefully it’s a winner.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 10:48 am to Mockingbird2008
I have to wait till Monday, my E*TRADE account for ETF from my small bank says the funds won’t be available until then
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:41 am to Jax-Tiger
quote:
Anyone curious as to why HGRAF has been so quiet, lately?
Curious, yes, but not concerned since we have seen at least some movement behind the scenes. Would like more progress toward filling the open Austin positions, especially since the HQ move is official now.
On the DARPA news.... I find it interesting they are asking for graphene load bearing data. This is just before the announcement of the DoW requesting to triple the drone budget. Related?
Could they be looking for ways to make drones faster, lighter, stronger and more efficient?
MSN
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 11:44 am
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:30 pm to Dock Holiday
quote:
This is just before the announcement of the DoW requesting to triple the drone budget. Related? Could they be looking for ways to make drones faster, lighter, stronger and more efficient?
Pardon my ignorance, but let’s say you’re correct. Would that be public information? Why give away military equipment secrets?
I guess it could be announced as a DOW procurement without additional details.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 1:17 pm to Jax-Tiger
Maybe this post on X in the Hydrograph Investors area will help.
Grok is asked to compare Hydrograph's Fractal Graphene vs First Graphene's Puregraph by poster Dan Pike, He asks for details in several areas such as cost, specs, applications and scalability. Here is the link:
X
Below is the first segment. There is a lot more detailed comparisons in the body of the Grok response,
Overall: HydroGraph is more cost-effective for high-performance, low-loading applications (polymers, coatings, batteries, lightweight composites). PureGRAPH is more economical for bulk, high-volume uses (construction, elastomers) where larger-platelet geometry provides value at moderate loadings.Bottom line: HydroGraph’s Fractal Graphene excels in efficiency, energy use, dispersion, and net incorporation cost due to its nano-fractal design and high SSA utilization. First Graphene’s PureGRAPH offers scale, lower raw cost, and strong aspect-ratio performance for specific macro-properties. Choice depends on the application—HydroGraph for “less is more” premium reinforcement; PureGRAPH for cost-effective bulk additive use. No head-to-head public studies exist, but independent testing (e.g., GEIC Manchester) and company data support these differentiators. HydroGraph’s Fractal Graphene (primarily FGA-1) and First Graphene’s PureGRAPH are both few-layer graphene nanoplatelet products, but they differ fundamentally in structure, production method, and performance characteristics. LINK (Note: First Graphene’s product line is PureGRAPH nanoplatelets/GNPs; there is no evidence of “graphene nanotubes” in their portfolio—the query likely refers to their large-platelet graphene nanoplatelets.)
Grok is asked to compare Hydrograph's Fractal Graphene vs First Graphene's Puregraph by poster Dan Pike, He asks for details in several areas such as cost, specs, applications and scalability. Here is the link:
X
Below is the first segment. There is a lot more detailed comparisons in the body of the Grok response,
Overall: HydroGraph is more cost-effective for high-performance, low-loading applications (polymers, coatings, batteries, lightweight composites). PureGRAPH is more economical for bulk, high-volume uses (construction, elastomers) where larger-platelet geometry provides value at moderate loadings.Bottom line: HydroGraph’s Fractal Graphene excels in efficiency, energy use, dispersion, and net incorporation cost due to its nano-fractal design and high SSA utilization. First Graphene’s PureGRAPH offers scale, lower raw cost, and strong aspect-ratio performance for specific macro-properties. Choice depends on the application—HydroGraph for “less is more” premium reinforcement; PureGRAPH for cost-effective bulk additive use. No head-to-head public studies exist, but independent testing (e.g., GEIC Manchester) and company data support these differentiators. HydroGraph’s Fractal Graphene (primarily FGA-1) and First Graphene’s PureGRAPH are both few-layer graphene nanoplatelet products, but they differ fundamentally in structure, production method, and performance characteristics. LINK (Note: First Graphene’s product line is PureGRAPH nanoplatelets/GNPs; there is no evidence of “graphene nanotubes” in their portfolio—the query likely refers to their large-platelet graphene nanoplatelets.)
Page 209 of 273
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News