Started By
Message

Ouch! 275k Jobs Added in February

Posted on 3/8/24 at 7:53 am
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51687 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 7:53 am
This will likely get revised downward, but as far as using it as a gauge right now it continues to move the needle away from rate cuts at least until June.

And once again, confusingly, Unemployment ticks UP even though there was strong job creation (moving up from January's 3.7 to 3.9 for February).

Also, Government is again a leader in job creation (52k, which comes in 2nd to the largest which was 85k for Private Education & Healthcare Services). Retail Trade ticked up 18.7k but Manufacturing went down another 4k.

Real Wage Growth slowed to .1%.

January numbers were revised down from 353k to 229k. Revisions to December and January numbers revised down ~167k. These mean there are still larger numbers than you want to see when you're needing the economy to contract.
This post was edited on 3/8/24 at 8:06 am
Posted by LSUcam7
FL
Member since Sep 2016
7906 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 8:00 am to


How many of those jobs are organic, true need for labor? Legitimately asking.

Quality/sustainability of the jobs added > the number
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51687 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 8:05 am to
quote:

How many of those jobs are organic, true need for labor? Legitimately asking.

Quality/sustainability of the jobs added > the number


For Retail and Manufacturing, those are likely very organic because of profit motive. Healthcare services and education can be because of government funding (ie: some organic, some inorganic). From what some of the discussion revolved around, many of the government jobs are likely state and local, funded by federal stimmy/covid programs still in progress (meaning: non-organic).

Those government-funded positions become even more important to note when looking at how much debt the federal government is continuing to accrue while servicing costs are skyrocketing.
This post was edited on 3/8/24 at 8:07 am
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73851 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 8:07 am to
quote:

January numbers were revised down from 353k to 229k


This is the best part of this

Rate cuts are back on the table for May
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21259 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Also, Government is again a leader in job creation


So election year crap.

Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
7749 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 8:18 am to
Dude, dig behind the headline numbers. How many of these are part time or illegal alien jobs? What are the numbers for native born Americans? Do the research. You may learn some things.

ETA: Just saw that in the last year the US has added over 900k part time jobs. And lost almost 300k full time jobs. Woof.
This post was edited on 3/8/24 at 8:29 am
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
10436 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 8:18 am to
Yields are ticking down on the news and stock futures are up
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51687 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Yields are ticking down on the news and stock futures are up


The market sees what the market wants to see.

Next week is CPI, PPI and advanced retail sales. With gasoline ticking up over February due to the rise in oil prices and the shutdown of BP's Whiting refinery, fuel isn't going to be keeping the non-Core number as low so we can expect that to remain above 3%. Core has been stalled at 3.9% thus far this year (staying higher than the 3.8% then 3.7% expectations for Jan then Feb). If it drops at all, that moves the needle closer to a cut in June but by how much will depend on what other data shows (especially revisions that are as large as the jobs revisions we've been seeing).
This post was edited on 3/8/24 at 9:27 am
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40567 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 9:38 am to
I’d understand revising it by a few thousand jobs but how the hell are the initial numbers that far off?
Posted by Pezzo
Member since Aug 2020
1955 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 10:02 am to
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85008 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:19 am to
quote:

I’d understand revising it by a few thousand jobs but how the hell are the initial numbers that far off?


Job market is a mess. The above posts about part time jobs and illegal immigrant jobs has a lot of truth to it.


Household survey is far less volatile. The uptick in unemployment and the lack of labor participation is the story today.
Posted by FLObserver
Jacksonville
Member since Nov 2005
14473 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:34 am to
Clueless Joe having those jobs numbers inflated until election to sugarcoat your buying power has tanked under his administration , prices thru the roof on everything and illegal immigration has skyrocketed but hey look at the part time jobs im supplying. Vote for me.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51687 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:53 am to
quote:

The uptick in unemployment and the lack of labor participation is the story today.


Both initial and continuing claims are holding steady at near-historic lows with the LFPR remaining stuck (3rd month in a row) at 62.5%. When breaking it down by age, nothing is changing (ie: the big movement of Boomers out of the workforce happened with/during COVID and the level is now maintaining), which confuses the issue even more. Where are these workers going? How are they surviving?

Since COVID there's been a marked climb in full-timers getting part-time jobs, but not a big increase overall jobholders holding multiple jobs (something like a .2% increase from Feb 2023).
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162231 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

And once again, confusingly, Unemployment ticks UP even though there was strong job creation (moving up from January's 3.7 to 3.9 for February).

I think you're the only one confused
Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
1292 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

This is the best part of this


I read another article somewhere that indicated “hours scheduled” is at near-recession levels.

That is to say, there are a lot of jobs but hours are being cut. So, I think rate cuts may indeed become more likely.
Posted by Tmcgin
BATON ROUGE
Member since Jun 2010
5007 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 12:48 pm to
A certain segment is pulling against our own economy
We still have a lot of work to do but thats a good number
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
7749 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

We still have a lot of work to do but thats a good number



What is good about it? Seriously asking. I see a bunch of menial and part time jobs being filled by illegal immigrants. Full time jobs and jobs for native Americans are falling. And to top it off the number is likely to be revised downward. I'm searching for something to be excited about, but don't see it. These are not the numbers found in a healthy economy.
Posted by Art Blakey
Member since Aug 2023
91 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 1:45 pm to
quote:


What is good about it? Seriously asking. I see a bunch of menial and part time jobs being filled by illegal immigrants. Full time jobs and jobs for native Americans are falling. And to top it off the number is likely to be revised downward. I'm searching for something to be excited about, but don't see it. These are not the numbers found in a healthy economy.


What? Fluffed up BLS labor data is all foreign born immigrants you say? Can't be.

LINK
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35239 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

What? Fluffed up BLS labor data is all foreign born immigrants you say? Can't be.
These data are highly cyclical/seasonal, particularly without any season adjustments. For example, if you look at the native population employment level in the middle of Trump's term, from July 2018 to January 2019, it shows a drop of 2,479,000, which is actually 32,000 more (just 1.3% though) than the 2,447,000 drop from July 2023 to January 2024. And not only are those numbers extremely close, the month to month chart looks quite, so clearly some sort of pattern that happens during this time period.

So whatever the interpretation of this for the most recent months, one should probably apply a similar interpretation to 2018

Finally though, if you look at the data from 2010-2019, you can a pretty clear upward trend but also a pretty noticeable seasonal/cyclical pattern pretty much every year.



Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11125 posts
Posted on 3/8/24 at 4:05 pm to
It’s only a 31% miss what’s the big deal??
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram