- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AT picks, where are they now?
Posted on 3/10/21 at 12:54 pm to AUHighPlainsDrifter
Posted on 3/10/21 at 12:54 pm to AUHighPlainsDrifter
quote:
I don't believe WKHS was an AT pick to begin with
No, it was definitely one of his picks. And it was one of his more confident picks at that. He even doubled down on his support after they missed on the USPS contract.
1
Posted on 3/10/21 at 12:55 pm to playmakers in space
And I think he was on WKHS when it was in the single digits.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:05 pm to playmakers in space
quote:why is that? have you done any DD on WKHS?
The only one I am not particularly high on is WKHS.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:06 pm to truthbetold
That’s not true. Several times AT mentioned that a lot, if not all of his picks were long term holds and not pump and dump.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:12 pm to slackster
quote:
His 90 day moonshots thread was straight up deleted but the picks were MVIS, WKHS, ZOM, and TSNPD. They’re all down substantially from the thread date in February, but there’s still still a couple months to go for the 90 days,
quote:which is it? the only one im not up in is WKHS because i got in later.
They’re all up since he first mentioned them though,
up 115% in zom
up 162% in tsnp
down 50% in WKHS.
I didnt even get it right when he brought up these stock. so they are WAY higher than when he brought them to the board. You need to get over your little hissy fit about him.
and BTW WKHS was 100% getting that contract until politics got involved. Which you see that now with other politicians calling this out. They were the only entry that submitted a products based on the criteria in the RFP. ANY other contract, the submittals that didnt follow criteria would have been thrown out.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:13 pm to iAmBatman
quote:liar.
AT picks, where are they now?
in the red
quote:you and slacker are 100% butthurt.
just butt hurt?
most definitely
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:13 pm to Ancient Astronaut
quote:you know absolutely nothing. read up before you make wild claims like this.
WKHS was a disaster. Not his fault I suppose, but it wasn’t a good pick.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:28 pm to GREENHEAD22
Doubled on SNDL and ZOM twice. Sold rest of SNDL holding my original investment in ZOM long term
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:29 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
why is that? have you done any DD on WKHS?
I have. And I'm not particularly high on it. I'm not really high on any of these North American EV plays to be honest. A lot of over-promising and under-delivering with these companies.
I did tell you I was a n00b, though. What do I know?
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:48 pm to playmakers in space
The only ev play that I like. (non tsla) is Lion Electric as far as been having vehicles. I was in workhorse but had got out just had a bad feeling and didn't like the fact that I couldn't find anything about their assembly line.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 1:54 pm to playmakers in space
quote:
WKHS
Class action incoming. I saw there were articles saying the postmaster said WKHS never had a chance at getting the USPS contract despite what the company was putting out in the press etc
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:11 pm to playmakers in space
quote:no prob. and yea i totally understand the OP-UD. but the play here was a grand slam. EVERYONE in the business knew it was going to WKHS because of the proposals. and politics got involved that fricked everything up. Lawsuits are on the way there.
I have. And I'm not particularly high on it. I'm not really high on any of these North American EV plays to be honest. A lot of over-promising and under-delivering with these companies.
I did tell you I was a n00b, though. What do I know?
But because of legislation EV companies will boom.... we are gambling on who all it is going to be.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:15 pm to GREENHEAD22
Up 112% in ARBKF
Up 102% in TSNPD
Down 56% in WKHS
Up 24% in ZOM and sold.
Up 102% in TSNPD
Down 56% in WKHS
Up 24% in ZOM and sold.
This post was edited on 3/10/21 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:19 pm to tigerpimpbot
quote:the postmaster wasnt choosing the contract and from everything i have read the RFP required an all electric vehicle. Doesnt matter if it is impractical or if the PMG says it is impractical. here is your link on the class action
Class action incoming. I saw there were articles saying the postmaster said WKHS never had a chance at getting the USPS contract despite what the company was putting out in the press etc
LINK
here is the links with legislators trying to halt the selection.
LINK LINK
This post was edited on 3/10/21 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:25 pm to CarRamrod
What criteria in the NGDV RFP did the other proposals, or specifically Oshkosh, not meet and can you link that info?
When I did DD on WKHS over the summer when it was brought up in the watchlist thread, all I saw in the RFP was specs on vehicle size, functionality, maintenance, and emission standards -- EPAct and EISA compliant.
ETA: Basically what I'm saying is I didn't see anything that said it had to be EV or hybrid only.
When I did DD on WKHS over the summer when it was brought up in the watchlist thread, all I saw in the RFP was specs on vehicle size, functionality, maintenance, and emission standards -- EPAct and EISA compliant.
ETA: Basically what I'm saying is I didn't see anything that said it had to be EV or hybrid only.
This post was edited on 3/10/21 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:26 pm to CarRamrod
The firm I saw was a different firm. Nobody will get anything from it but the lawyers anyway
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:30 pm to CajunTiger78
quote:
Doubled on SNDL
As did I. Could have tripled but played it a bit safe.
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:33 pm to CarRamrod
If I only lost about 6k should I even bother? It says if you lost 100k or more you should contact them...or am I too small a fish in this fight?
This post was edited on 3/10/21 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 3/10/21 at 2:34 pm to CajunTiger78
quote:
Doubled on SNDL and ZOM twice. Sold rest of SNDL holding my original investment in ZOM long term
Was SNDL one of his as well? I made a little over 300% and sold on that, forgot if it was one of his. Thanks AT
Posted on 3/10/21 at 3:14 pm to TheChosenOne
i dont remember. but i though it said that there had to be an all Electric option. and workhorse was the only proposal that had that.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News