- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would you have taken Bellichick?
Posted on 12/13/24 at 11:15 pm to LuzianaFootball
Posted on 12/13/24 at 11:15 pm to LuzianaFootball
quote:How'd Bill do before Tom arrived?
How'd Bill do once Tom left?
Minus Brady, ole Bill has a losing record over his career with a grand total of one playoff win...ONE.
Posted on 12/13/24 at 11:35 pm to BMTiger
quote:Brady, with all the "Lunch Pail" OL's and WR's.........
Tom Brady carried him.
Posted on 12/13/24 at 11:44 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
Bills only 4 seasons out of 19 with a winning record
Jets only 8 out of 19 seasons with a winning record
Dolphins only 6 out of 19 seasons with a winning record
Yet the Patriots still had to go through the best of the AFC in the playoffs & beat the best of the NFC in those Super Bowls.
quote:
Brady years in NE, these are what those pathetic teams did
From your post on page 1 in this thread.
quote:
Brady carried Bellichick
So now you have gone from your original narrative that Brady carried Belichick to this new narrative that tries to discredit both Brady's & Belichick's accomplishments. You seem a bit
Posted on 12/14/24 at 3:22 am to Madking
I know what hypocrisy means. Perhaps, it is more that your messages are incoherent and downright stupid and made by an apparent football virgin...a drunken one at that.
This post was edited on 12/14/24 at 3:32 am
Posted on 12/14/24 at 3:29 am to BigBrod81
Wow, you can't keep up with posts can you. The weakness of the Patriots division was in response to the idiot's point about how Belichick won 68% of his games. It is called "strength of schedule", Einstein. Most football fans have heard of it.. That does NOT mean they couldn't win the Super Bowl but the percentages are skewed by playing a bunch of nobody teams 6 times a year. Oh, and what was mentioned by another poster was the cast around Brady. That was made possible by one simple act by Brady...NOT Belichick. Tom Brady gave up salary in order for the Patriots to sign a strong supporting cast for him...in a salary cap environment that makes all the difference in the world. Ask Mahones who has done the same thing with the Chiefs and ask Prescott and Lamb of the Cowboys why they haven't done the same...and it shows. The Cowboys have all their cap money tied up in a few players and get also rans for the rest of the team.
Apparently, you have the logic skills of broccoli. You might want to ask someone to help you understand that your response was utterly stupid and not relevant to my point. Hey man, ask for help to make your posts...nothing shameful about doing that.
Apparently, you have the logic skills of broccoli. You might want to ask someone to help you understand that your response was utterly stupid and not relevant to my point. Hey man, ask for help to make your posts...nothing shameful about doing that.
This post was edited on 12/14/24 at 3:43 am
Posted on 12/14/24 at 11:44 am to SelaTiger
We are stuck with mediocrity for at least 4 more years. LSU has put themselves in a serious bind. Nothing we can do but wait it out.
The team that should sign Bellicheck is Michigan. They have a moron coaching them.
Bellicheck brings a lot to the table, and for all you morons out there that think he wasn't a major reason for all their championships, you just don't understand how winning programs are built.
He took a 6th round draft pick from Michigan....why, because he saw something in Brady that he could develop and his did, and he had a HOF career because of it. Brady wasn't the only player that thrived under Bellicheck to win the titles he has.
The clout he has in living rooms with recruit's parents has to be massive, especialy at the QB position but just overall. LSU needs a program builder that has done it before with great success. Bellicheck over BK is a slam dunk decision. I wish LSU had that opportunity.
I will also so that Baker will never leave NC for LSU or anyone now, and I think NC will be a regular playoff team in no less than 3 years and then unti Bellicheck retires. Coaches wanting to be part of a great coaching tree will flock to him and NC will be the beneficiary. One of them will take over NC when Bellicheck wants to retire and will recommend one of his coaches.
The team that should sign Bellicheck is Michigan. They have a moron coaching them.
Bellicheck brings a lot to the table, and for all you morons out there that think he wasn't a major reason for all their championships, you just don't understand how winning programs are built.
He took a 6th round draft pick from Michigan....why, because he saw something in Brady that he could develop and his did, and he had a HOF career because of it. Brady wasn't the only player that thrived under Bellicheck to win the titles he has.
The clout he has in living rooms with recruit's parents has to be massive, especialy at the QB position but just overall. LSU needs a program builder that has done it before with great success. Bellicheck over BK is a slam dunk decision. I wish LSU had that opportunity.
I will also so that Baker will never leave NC for LSU or anyone now, and I think NC will be a regular playoff team in no less than 3 years and then unti Bellicheck retires. Coaches wanting to be part of a great coaching tree will flock to him and NC will be the beneficiary. One of them will take over NC when Bellicheck wants to retire and will recommend one of his coaches.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 3:12 pm to QB
quote:
LSU needs a program builder that has done it before with great success. Bellicheck over BK is a slam dunk decision. I wish LSU had that opportunity.
This fanbase can be so retarded
Posted on 12/14/24 at 4:01 pm to LuzianaFootball
quote:
Why do people think we can old coaches stay great forever. How'd Bill do once Tom left?
Bk is old and was never great in the first place.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 4:02 pm to QB
Is anyone excited about BK coming back as coach next season? If Belichick was coming in, the anticipation and buzz would be through the roof. LSU’s program has already gotten stale under Kelly.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 4:05 pm to SelaTiger
Absolutely! Name another coach who has a better résumé
Posted on 12/14/24 at 6:12 pm to SidewalkTiger
So, with your post, you would choose BK over Bellichek if you had the choice for the LSU HC position. That is what i interpret from your childish post, and I can't think of anything much more naive.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 6:36 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
Wow, you can't keep up with posts can you. The weakness of the Patriots division was in response to the idiot's point about how Belichick won 68% of his games. It is called "strength of schedule", Einstein. Most football fans have heard of it.. That does NOT mean they couldn't win the Super Bowl but the percentages are skewed by playing a bunch of nobody teams 6 times a year. Oh, and what was mentioned by another poster was the cast around Brady. That was made possible by one simple act by Brady...NOT Belichick. Tom Brady gave up salary in order for the Patriots to sign a strong supporting cast for him...in a salary cap environment that makes all the difference in the world. Ask Mahones who has done the same thing with the Chiefs and ask Prescott and Lamb of the Cowboys why they haven't done the same...and it shows. The Cowboys have all their cap money tied up in a few players and get also rans for the rest of the team.
quote:
Apparently, you have the logic skills of broccoli. You might want to ask someone to help you understand that your response was utterly stupid and not relevant to my point. Hey man, ask for help to make your posts...nothing shameful about doing that.

Posted on 12/14/24 at 7:04 pm to BigBrod81
This is what happens when you combine a stupid person with a stupid argument. He makes hypocritical statements to support his uneducated and objectively false statements then resorts to attacking you because he either can’t understand the holes in his own argument or can understand them and just throws fits to try and deflect from his obvious failure.
This post was edited on 12/14/24 at 7:05 pm
Posted on 12/14/24 at 7:13 pm to QB
quote:
So, with your post, you would choose BK over Bellichek if you had the choice for the LSU HC position. That is what i interpret from your childish post, and I can't think of anything much more naive.
Belichick is an absolute unknown as a college coach and is a decade older than our already "aged" head coach.
No way I'd take Belichick over BK, what would be the reasoning to do so?
This post was edited on 12/14/24 at 7:16 pm
Posted on 12/14/24 at 7:37 pm to BigBrod81
Whatever time it took you to compose that post....you need to ask for that part of your life back! FAILURE!
Posted on 12/14/24 at 7:39 pm to Madking
The only holes are the ones in your head. I have documented facts about that overrated coach Belichick who rode the coattails of Tom Brady because he was a TOTAL FAILURE as a coach BEFORE and AFTER Brady. All you do is post drivel...I still believe you are posting from a bar over your limit.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 7:43 pm to SidewalkTiger
Prediction: Belichick will be a bust as the N Carolina coach...too old...not a player's coach...can't handle the media....and most of all, I'm pretty sure Tom Brady can't become the QB of the Tarheels (out of eligibility).
And I have already proven that "Beli" isn't even close to attaining .500 as a head coach unless Tom Brady is his QB.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 8:02 pm to Madking
Yes, I have documented his TOTAL FAILURES as a coach at Cleveland and also at New England when Brady was the QB. Not even close to a .500 coach during those years as a HC.
Posted on 12/14/24 at 8:03 pm to NotaStarGazer
No you didn’t, you made hypocritical statements that debunked your own argument and applied double standards you’d never even try to apply to anyone else because they were nonsensical.
Popular
Back to top



0




