- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Women's B Ball Coach - K Mulky?
Posted on 3/16/11 at 3:34 pm to lsualum96
Posted on 3/16/11 at 3:34 pm to lsualum96
By the way, I just watched Alleva's presser. He stated that LSU is going to pay MARKET VALUE to get a great coach an that the search will be national. The next coach will have to have proven they can recruit among the best in the nation, have had past success, and can get the program back to where we're used to. Sounds like they may try to go after a big name which means just like I was saying............................................................
LSU is going to pay at least $500k for their next women's basketball coach. So, I guess some of you guys better start writing your protest letters to Alleva.
LSU is going to pay at least $500k for their next women's basketball coach. So, I guess some of you guys better start writing your protest letters to Alleva.
Posted on 3/16/11 at 3:34 pm to LSUDad
quote:
None of us on this board KNOWS who is turning a profit.
I took Sports Marketing class in 2008, actual test questions were on which sports made a profit. Football and Men's Basketball (inconsistently, depending on success) are the only sports that generate a profit. Baseball is regularly close to breakeven, believe it or not. All other sports feed off of those two. FACT. I got an 'A' in the class and Alleva was a guest speaker who confirmed these stats.
Posted on 3/16/11 at 3:35 pm to lsualum96
quote:
But see that's the thing. None of us on this board KNOWS who is turning a profit. I'd venture to say that the only program on LSU's campus that "turns a profit" is football. So then the actual question becomes, why spend top dollar on ANY sports programs at LSU if they don't make a profit? And then the ASSUMPTION is that LSU only fields sports teams to make a profit......................which is patently false.
Yes we do know. All that stuff is public record. This is from an artcle published a few weeks ago, but I've seen it other places as well. LSU turns a profit from 3 sports: football, men's hoops and baseball. Most schools lose money on baseball as well.
LINK
Posted on 3/16/11 at 3:39 pm to King Joey
quote:
You lose a lot of credibility when you try to ignore the distinction between not paying a 7 figure salary for a women's basketball coach and "eliminating the program." NOBODY is talking about eliminating womens basketball except YOU. Why? What possible motivation could you have for raising the issue of eliminating programs if you have a valid argument to make on the actual topic here? Bottom line is we do know what programs turn a profit. Football obviously does, baseball usually does, and mens basketball usually does. There has never been any evidence to suggest that LSU Womens Basketball has turned a profit, despite several years of outstanding success.
Well, actually it is you who has lost credibility. You are ASSUMING that basketball and baseball turn a profit. Come up with the hard numbers. Otherwise you're gauging profit on how many butts you see in the seats.
But, since it appears that we MUST have a women's basketball program, why would you want it to be mediocre. In 2009 LSU sports generated $110 million. Does it really bring so much psychological discomfort to some of you that LSU migth actually use less than 5% of that to hire a women's basketball coach.............................................really?
LSU Sports Revenues for 2009
Posted on 3/16/11 at 3:40 pm to Rouge
quote:
let me make myself clear for hopefully the last time
i have no problem with fielding teams
i do have a problem with paying coaches a lot of money when their teams lose money every season
i do not believe in throwing money at a program that never has proven to draw fans
i believe in fiscal responsibility, even at the college level. that does
+1
Posted on 3/16/11 at 3:44 pm to lsualum96
quote:
And why should it matter if the entire department is turning a profit
Do you know shite about running a business ?
Posted on 3/16/11 at 3:47 pm to lsualum96
Thanks for the input on the profits guys. I figured somebody would know.
So, now we see out of the $110 million dollars baseball contributed $1.8 million and basketball contributed $2.6 million. Are you serious? This is not even a debate worth having. Football is carrying everybody at LSU obviously. But, like what was said in the article, Title IX makes it so you have to have these other sports. The key quote is this.....................
So, in other words, LSU can still field teams in sports that don't turn a profit and it doesn't hurt them one bit. This is why Alleva's going to get a coach that makes at least $500K.
And there it is.........................THIS is indeed the question.
Yep, I actually do. But since college sports ISN'T A BUSINESS then that question is actually moot
So, now we see out of the $110 million dollars baseball contributed $1.8 million and basketball contributed $2.6 million. Are you serious? This is not even a debate worth having. Football is carrying everybody at LSU obviously. But, like what was said in the article, Title IX makes it so you have to have these other sports. The key quote is this.....................
quote:
But LSU athletic director and vice-chancellor Joe Alleva says the ideals of profitability and opportunities are inseparable. “If you don’t make money, you can’t provide opportunity,” he said.
Fortunately for Alleva, LSU does make money. The athletic department is one of only two in the nation which receives not a dime of federal money or student fees, yet they still manage to give back $8 million a year to the school.
So, in other words, LSU can still field teams in sports that don't turn a profit and it doesn't hurt them one bit. This is why Alleva's going to get a coach that makes at least $500K.
quote:
Do you know shite about running a business ?
And there it is.........................THIS is indeed the question.
Yep, I actually do. But since college sports ISN'T A BUSINESS then that question is actually moot
This post was edited on 3/16/11 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 3/16/11 at 3:49 pm to lsualum96
quote:and it still will be a bad investment
This is why Alleva's going to get a coach that makes at least $500K.
hate to be harsh, but it's true
i'd rather take $250K of that and pay the football assistant coaches
Posted on 3/16/11 at 3:52 pm to Rouge
These ppl can forget about Mulkey
LINK
From the 1990s until her 2006 divorce she was known as Kim Mulkey-Robertson. She spent her childhood in Tickfaw, Louisiana. She has two children: Kramer and Makenzie, a freshman on the 2010-11 team.
I seriously doubt she would leave Baylor when her daughter plays for her.
I know some personal things about Mulkey and I just can't see her being a good fit at LSU.
LINK
From the 1990s until her 2006 divorce she was known as Kim Mulkey-Robertson. She spent her childhood in Tickfaw, Louisiana. She has two children: Kramer and Makenzie, a freshman on the 2010-11 team.
I seriously doubt she would leave Baylor when her daughter plays for her.
I know some personal things about Mulkey and I just can't see her being a good fit at LSU.
Posted on 3/16/11 at 3:53 pm to Rouge
quote:
and it still will be a bad investment hate to be harsh, but it's true
Oh, I don't have a problem with that. In fact, if you're looking at it profit-wise, you're right. I wouldn't even argue that. But, like I said, the AD is not looking at it like that. His job is to make sure LSU athletics are the best they can be while the DEPARTMENT doesn't lose money while doing so.
Paying a coach $500K won't hurt the profitability of his department. If it did, I guarantee he wouldn't do it. But, he will. Just watch..................................................................
Posted on 3/16/11 at 3:55 pm to Michael J
quote:
From the 1990s until her 2006 divorce she was known as Kim Mulkey-Robertson. She spent her childhood in Tickfaw, Louisiana. She has two children: Kramer and Makenzie, a freshman on the 2010-11 team.
I think my mom worked with Kim Mulkey's mom at the AT&T in Hammond.
Posted on 3/16/11 at 3:57 pm to lsualum96
so keep paying top dollar into a program that doesnt draw fans and doesnt play for, much less win, national titles
i was all ok for letting our T&F coach leave for Texas A&M over money, but at least we were winning tons of national titles
i was all ok for letting our T&F coach leave for Texas A&M over money, but at least we were winning tons of national titles
Posted on 3/16/11 at 4:00 pm to lsualum96
*sigh*
I WANT TO SPEND MONEY ON THE WOMENS BASKETBALL COACH!
Did it get through that time?
jeez.

quote:No, I'm not. Whether I bother to do your research for you or not, the reality is that I do have some knowledge regarding what programs turn (or have turned) a profit at LSU, so I'm not assuming anything. If you want to call me a liar -- even though I'M ON YOUR SIDE -- then YOU should come with some numbers -- any numbers whatsoever -- to support such an assertion if you choose to make it.
You are ASSUMING that basketball and baseball turn a profit. Come up with the hard numbers. Otherwise you're gauging profit on how many butts you see in the seats.
quote:Why would you intentionally ignore the entire part of my post that directly supported your position. I WANT to spend money on our next womens basketball coach. Why are you lying and claiming I'm against it? What is you problem? Why do you have to insult and slander people? Are you trying to piss people off? Are you just insistent on lies and ad hominem attacks? Do you want to be reported for lying about other posters in this thread? Why can't you carry on a rational conversation without making false accusations and lying about the position of people WHO ARE ON YOUR SIDE?!?!
why would you want it to be mediocre.
I WANT TO SPEND MONEY ON THE WOMENS BASKETBALL COACH!
Did it get through that time?
jeez.
Posted on 3/16/11 at 4:03 pm to King Joey
How much is Kentucky paying Matthew Mitchell? Any chance we can get him?
Posted on 3/16/11 at 4:03 pm to Rouge
quote:
so keep paying top dollar into a program that doesnt draw fans and doesnt play for, much less win, national titles
So now the standard is national titles? Wow! NOBODY is guaranteed to do that no matter how much you pay. What I'd like is someone who can win the SEC and consistently CONTEND for NCAA championships..........and hopefully win one every once in a while. During their best years, LSU's women drew around 7000 fans per game. That's good enough when you compare to other top ten programs.
So, yes, I think you should pay top dollar. And thankfully, Alleva thinks so too.
Posted on 3/16/11 at 4:05 pm to lsursb
quote:
How much is Kentucky paying Matthew Mitchell? Any chance we can get him?
Google was my friend....got my own answer. $600,000 base.....dang.
LINK
Nikki Caldwell's base salary at UCLA is 1.4 Million. Is our AD really ready to spend that much money on a coach?
This post was edited on 3/16/11 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 3/16/11 at 4:07 pm to lsursb
In other words, Mitchell is being paid MARKET VALUE.....................and he's never even won and SEC championship or SEC tournament championship.
Mark my words guys..............................LSU's next coach is going to make between $500k and $1 million. Bookmark this thread for when it happens.
Mark my words guys..............................LSU's next coach is going to make between $500k and $1 million. Bookmark this thread for when it happens.
Posted on 3/16/11 at 4:13 pm to lsualum96
Thanks for the link LSU Dad. Here's Alleva's direct quote once more............
Hmmmmm. Well. You know.............................
The article also says............
So, if we were to pay a coach market value, this would be somewere in the neighborhood of 0.5% of the athletic budget.
How dare they spend that kind of money on a sport that doesn't turn a profit! I'm gonna call the AD's office right now! Who do they think they are?!!(sarcasm).

quote:
The three sports that make a profit at the University are football, baseball and men's basketball, with football making up the majority of the profit. "Football is the sport that supports all the other sports," Alleva said.
Hmmmmm. Well. You know.............................
The article also says............
quote:
The Athletic Department gives 3 percent — an average of about $3.5 million over the past few years — of its budget to the University for administrative overhead in a normal year. The department will be asked to give back 5 percent — about $6 million — of its budget to the University in the fiscal year from July 2009 to July 2010, Vincent said.
So, if we were to pay a coach market value, this would be somewere in the neighborhood of 0.5% of the athletic budget.
How dare they spend that kind of money on a sport that doesn't turn a profit! I'm gonna call the AD's office right now! Who do they think they are?!!(sarcasm).
Posted on 3/16/11 at 4:13 pm to lsualum96
quote:
During their best years, LSU's women drew around 7000 fans per game
2005-2006 season (Final Four Team)
LINK
page 32 - 6,001 attendance per game
2006-2007 season (Final Four Team)
LINK
ATCLID=661115&SPSID=27832&SPID=2167&DB_LANG=C&DB_OEM_ID=5200
page 8
"LSU’s sits 18th in the nation in home attendance this season with a 5,321 average"
2007-2008 season (Final Four Team)
LINK
page 36
5,468 attendance per game
This post was edited on 3/16/11 at 4:17 pm
Back to top


0



