Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Los Angeles, CA
Biography:A rabid LSU fan...........and alumni
Interests:LSU football, LSU Women's Basketball
Occupation:
Number of Posts:3360
Registered on:11/2/2005
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Alicia Tournebize

Posted by lsualum96 on 12/24/25 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

On a fast break she can easily dunk. She’s not driving the lane and throwing it down on someone.


I think we need to not be so enamored with women who can dunk. Nowadays, there are MANY ladies that can dunk. But think about how many times you've acutally seen them do it in games. It's VERY rare. Toby Fournier has a ton of dunking videos from high school, and there were a ton of uninformed "fans" who declared she was going to dominate women's basketball. How many dunks did she have against LSU earlier this month.....................................................? Zero.

Fournier Dunking in HS........

re: Alicia Tournebize

Posted by lsualum96 on 12/24/25 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Did LSU women even recruit her?

Signed with South Carolina from the French pro team, and she's a 6-7 monster who dunks. She starts with SC next semester.

Was LSU after her?


We've more than likely focused more on Sara Okeke, than this young lady. Besides, Okeke worked her over in the FIBA tournament............

Okeke Wins MVP of the FIBA Tournament

:geauxtigers:
quote:

I feel like Sara Okeke would a bigger get than Robinson anyway. Okeke is a big and we need forwards and a center more than guards next season. Fingers crossed for Okeke. ??


For us, Okeke would absolutely be a bigger get than Robinson because she's at a position of need. Even if she came here for only one season, we'd be good because Caroline Bradley will be here the very next season.

:geauxtigers:

re: So Jerzey committed to USC

Posted by lsualum96 on 12/23/25 at 6:28 pm to
Well, I was hoping we might be able to still pull Robinson despite the fact that she would more than likely be coming off the bench her freshman season.................and more than likely the 2nd or 3rd player coming off the bench. Gone are the days when UConn and Tennessee would just stockpile the best players, even if they knew they wouldn't get significant minutes in their firs two seasons. Nowadays, kids want to play right away and that wasn't going to be possible here at LSU OR at UConn for that matter. So, essentially, we only got one recruit in this high school cycle. Normally that would be bad, but with all we have coming back next season, we're still in good shape!

quote:

We’re doing women’s basketball commitment posts now?


Where have YOU been?! :lol:

:geauxtigers:

re: LSU WBB vs UT Arlington

Posted by lsualum96 on 12/22/25 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

Cool. And my philosphy is I'm not going to watch when they play teams they will beat by 60, which is her entire chosen non conference schedule (the SEC/ACC challenge was forced on her). I'll watch the SEC games.


I think you're absolutely entitled to do that. Just stop complaining about it, when you know she's not going to change. :rolleyes:

quote:

Did she do that at Baylor, or did she just start that at LSU? I know in 2019 she played s lot better schedule and won it all.


She probably didn't because, if you remember, that was a veteran team coming back that was expected to compete for the NCAA championship. This season's team at LSU has 8 new players and the team three seasons ago had nine new players. I have a feeling that next year, their non-conference schedule will be tougher, but still will have a lot of lower ranked teams on it.

re: LSU WBB vs UT Arlington

Posted by lsualum96 on 12/22/25 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

Geno, Summitt, Staley… all tards?

23 national titles. They schedule marquee out of conference games. 1) you truly learn which players on your team you can trust. 2) the players learn by playing legit competition. BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY 3) it grows the game., it gets eyeballs on the product. Look at this game thread, 4 posts about the game, about 5 asking about a player injury/suspension, and the rest us arguing over scheduling. Go look up the Duke game thread, it’s 8 pages of game discussion plus multiple threads started about the game.

Kim Mulkey has yet to win a SEC regular season title at LSU, and perhaps the charmin soft non conference schedule leads to that. Schedule a few better games in November or December and you might pick up an extra loss or two, but it might save you a loss or two in SEC play. And the NCAA selection committee might give you credit instead of under seeding the team each year.


Everything you said above may, or may not be true. What I do know is that over the past ten years, Staley has won 3 NCAA titles, Kim has won two, and Geno has won one. So, what she's doing IS working. She has stated again........................and again............and again. She only cares about getting a top four seed for the NCAA tournament and getting two home games, so that they have a favorable road to the final four. Yes, it's possible she could have more SEC titles. But she is willing to use the conference season to prepare her team for the NCAA tournament. We don't have to like it...............but it is her philosophy.

re: LSU WBB vs UT Arlington

Posted by lsualum96 on 12/22/25 at 1:07 am to
quote:

The 8 home games in SEC play include Kentucky, Texas, Alabama, South Carolina, Tennessee. Those games alone are worth the price of season tickets. PMAC is going to be LIT for all of them.


Exactly! The preseason games really don't matter. I'd love for us to schedule some tough games in the preseason, but that's for "entertainment purposes only". Ultimately, all that mattes are conference games for teams in the SEC.

re: LSU WBB vs UT Arlington

Posted by lsualum96 on 12/21/25 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

This. Plus it has been shown over the years that LSU has been penalized majorly for any loss. The committee frowns on it. We have been under seeded every single year minus Kims first year here. IMO Kim would have been to one more final four so far with a better non conference schedule. Unless you go undefeated LSU will not be a 1 seed. There is a huge advangtage making to the final four as a 1 seed.

I know Kim can do no wrong on here but IMO its an old school line of thinking that she needs to change. Obviously, I could be wrong.


I understand what you're trying to say here. However, she has explained her scheduling philosophy ad nauseum in her press conferences. Yes, would we like to see her schedule a FEW more higher ranked teams, but it's really irrelevant because of the conference schedule they play. I know it's not what people want to hear, but she has stated this MANY times. In terms of NCAA seeding, she has also stated all she cares about is getting a top 4 seed so that they get two home games. That's it. So, if you're expecting her to schedule more tough games in November and December, because the "fans" want to see it.......................................it ain't gonna happen.

I think, rather than any of us continuing to question the scheduling, we should just enjoy these preseason games in anticipation for the REAL season to start. Other teams believe in scheduling VERY tough in the preseason, but not many of them.........save for UConn............have had more success than Mulkey's teams.

:geauxtigers:
quote:

Me too, especially give they pack the PMAC almost every time they play, which many on this thread seem to completely ignore.

I mean like it or not there's real interest in women's hoops here, so much so the title of the thread is almost laughable in it's ignorance.

I think one can admit that U-Highs boys team would beat our gals by 20 points and still enjoy our women's hoops for what it is.


I was thinking this exactly^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The question itself is kinda weird considering that our ladies have consistently ranked in the top ten in attendance for the past 3 seasons. So, I'm not sure how they're not "beloved", other than the few morons on Tigerdroppings who hate women. I think the LSU sports community actually does a pretty good job of supporting this team as long as Kim has been the coach. :dunno:

:geauxtigers:

re: Lsu women BB

Posted by lsualum96 on 12/8/25 at 8:40 am to
I would agree. Initially it was Zakiyah Johnson. But I think as the season goes on, Johnson is going to start to struggle more because playing power forward is not her natural position. It IS Knox's natural position.

:geauxtigers:

re: Lsu women BB

Posted by lsualum96 on 12/7/25 at 10:04 pm to
I REALLY love Grace Knox's game. At first when I saw her play in high school I wasn't sure she deserved the high ranking she had. Boy was I wrong!

:geauxtigers:

re: These Lady Tigers are Special

Posted by lsualum96 on 12/7/25 at 1:05 pm to
Oh, that goes without saying. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if one of the teams currently in the top four, won't make the NCAA final four.

re: These Lady Tigers are Special

Posted by lsualum96 on 12/6/25 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

We are good, but UCLA is by far and away the best this year

Hopefully not on their side the bracket come Tourney time


Clearly, you haven't been paying attention to the women's game this season. UCLA is "far and away" the best team? The same UCLA that lost to Texas on a neutral court last week, by eleven points? :lol: :lol:
quote:

Great breakdown lsualum96
Was encouraged by our paint players
Mikayla’s mid/long range game is unreal
Fulwiley needs to rein it in a bit. I like that she’s got that extra gear, but she needs to use it more judiciously.
FJ looked mediocre at times, great at times.
This team obviously won’t be a tough as nails D, so I’d like to see them take care of the ball better, much better.
I don’t know much about analytics, but I can’t imagine that was a very efficient 93 pts. That’s fine now, but will need to improve.


I think this team will play good enough defense to beat just about every team. I don't think they'll be the type of defense that will hold teams to 60 ppg consistently, but they don't need to. Also, I thought they were pretty efficient offensively considering they shot 60% from the field and 45% from the three. But they could definitely have cut down on the turnovers tonight.
Also, we have a pretty sizeable alumni chapter in the Triangle. I'm actually not surprised there were a lot of us there.

:geauxtigers:

re: These Lady Tigers are Special

Posted by lsualum96 on 12/4/25 at 11:06 pm to
quote:

This was a good win, but Duke had 5 losses coming in. Almost all against great opponents like South Carolina and UCLA, but losses none the less. They lost to UCLA by 30. They are coming off a loss to South Florida as well. This was our first test against a team with a heartbeat, but still plenty to clean up.


I would agree, but they're still a good defensive team with talent, and this was on THEIR home floor. Last week South Carolina beat them 83-66 and we beat them IN Durham 93-77..................and that's with a slow start!

Things I liked..........................
-Joyner was VERY impressive on the block. THAT is the player I was expecting when she transferred in.

-Koval was doing a very good job protecting the paint. She didn't block a bunch of shots but, she altered a lot and was not very movable when she was down there.

-I LOVE Grace Knox's game! That is all

-Milaysia, looked good but had too many turnovers and too many crazy shots

-Mikaylah was on FIRE in the second half. Her jump shot is a thing of beauty

-Flau'je looked like she was trying too hard in the first half, but then got settled in the second. Then she caugh fire. She also had too many turnover though.

-Jada looks more and more comfortable. She's not spectacular like Milaysia, BUT she does NOT turn the ball over and her shot has come around.

This was the first game where I thought Zakiyah looked lost and a little overwhelmed...............................which you would expect from a freshman in a big game like this. Hopefully, she'll be fine moving forward.

:geauxtigers:
I was wondering that as well. I haven't heard anything about her family situation and was it resolved.................... :dunno:
I'm not so sure Koval and Joyner can match up with Okot and Edwards, but they may not have to with the guard depth and talent we have.
quote:

what guard rotations for Texas are you talking about?

Texas only plays 7 players. Five are Forwards, including Booker. They played two guards the whole game. No 8-13 players had any minutes in their big games this year.
Lee and Harmon played the full 40 as did Booker, against USC. And they almost did the same in the UCLA game. They apparently have no discernable depth. And they two they bring off the bench play like 10 min or so.


Actually, the reason UT played so many players heavy minutes in that last tournament is that they have three players who are hurt right now, who get significant minutes. Their depth is fine..............maybe not AS deep as LSU, but deep enough. Trust me, with the type of defense they play, they will be a tough out for us.
quote:

We actually have those already. They just need correct development and taught a winning scheme


Exactly! There's no need to run out and collect a bunch of 5 star OL, if you don't have the coaches to develop them. We already have a bunch of those kids on this roster. Develop THEM first!
The thing about this offense for me is, I NEVER thought I'd see a worse offense at LSU than that 2009 team. However, I can say without question, this is the worse offense I've ever seen at LSU as a fan of the program for 30 years.
:dope: